Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Robert Kuttner: Financial Reform at a Crossroads

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 11:35 AM
Original message
Robert Kuttner: Financial Reform at a Crossroads
Edited on Fri Apr-23-10 11:42 AM by flpoljunkie
(I totally agree with Kuttner's conclusion if the Dems pass a weak financial reform bill. We cannot continue to be held hostage to a reckless and greedy Wall Street--waiting for the next big crash!)
Robert Kuttner
Co-Founder and Co-Editor of The American Prospect

Posted: April 23, 2010 11:04 AM

Financial Reform at a Crossroads

The financial reform bill now pending in the Senate could be a huge win-- for both restraining the excesses of Wall Street and for Democratic progressives -- or Senator Chris Dodd could snatch defeat out of the jaws of victory. The risk is a replay of the endgame of the healthcare battle, but in reverse: instead of Democrats hanging together and passing a bill with the president belatedly leading, we could see a hollow bipartisanship and a feeble bill.

On Thursday, there was an uncharacteristically fractious meeting of the Senate Democratic Caucus. On one side, leading progressives such as Maria Cantwell, Ted Kauffman, Dick Durbin, Byron Dorgan, and Jeff Merkley, argued that this was a moment to put forward floor amendments that would both strengthen the bill and force Republicans to take difficult votes either backing reforms or identifying themselves with Wall Street.

But the Banking Committee Chairman, Chris Dodd, was more inclined to try and strike deal over the weekend with his Republican counterpart, Richard Shelby, for a bipartisan bill. The price of this would be weaker provisions on derivatives, consumer protection, and on resolving failed large banks. The political price would be that progressives don't get to offer floor amendments. Under Dodd's scheme, which is favored by Obama's legislative and economic advisers, the Senate would immediately vote to take up the bill, and would then vote cloture by a wide bipartisan margin. The bill -- still a shell with details to be filled in later -- would go directly to the House, where the House-passed bill would become the vehicle for the final measure.

This course would be an appalling abdication, and it would be stupid politics. The protestations by the Republican Senate leader, Mitch McConnell, that the Democrats are proposing a pro-Wall Street bill, have been ringing increasingly hollow. It's Republicans who have been working hand in glove with Wall Street lobbyists. The problem is that so have several Democrats, including Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner.


If the bipartisan strategy is adopted, both parties will declare victory and go home. Some of Obama's advisers think this is smart politics because it gets financial reform off the table, and presumably gets it off talk radio because the Republicans will have been enlisted as partners. But think again. Anything that Mitch McConnell can support is not worth having. And if Obama's tactical advisers think that passing a feeble bill will make the anti-Wall Street popular sentiment disappear, they are kidding themselves. Regular Americans will just see both parties as sellouts, and the tea parties will get new recruits.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-kuttner/financial-reform-at-a-cro_b_549424.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Damn, the worst of all outcomes...
Better to fail and let the republicans shoulder the blame than to placate the plutocrats on Wall Street.

What would Teddy do? No Kennedy but Roosevelt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. I used to respect Chris Dodd...
before I came to understand that he has always been a tool of the big banks. It's disheartening that our Democratic Party has sunk this low. I cannot support this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC