Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: Senate GOP Proposes Alternate Consumer Financial Protection Plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 12:17 PM
Original message
AP: Senate GOP Proposes Alternate Consumer Financial Protection Plan
Dems must not let the consumer financial protection agency, CFPA, be weakened more than it already is. Elizabeth Warren made this point very clearly this morning on MSNBC's Morning Joe. Yet the Republicans are trying to do just that.
Senate GOP proposes alternate consumer plan

By JIM KUHNHENN
The Associated Press

Wednesday, May 5, 2010; 12:45 PM

WASHINGTON -- Opening a new front in the fight over Wall Street regulations, Senate Republicans want to reduce the power of a proposed consumer protection bureau by making its rules subject to approval by a top banking regulator.

The GOP plan ciruclating Wednesday would create a division of consumer protection within the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. to oversee nonbank mortgage companies and write consumer regulations. The FDIC would have to sign off on those rules.

A Democratic plan backed by the Obama administration would create an independent bureau within the Federal Reserve to police lending and other customer financial service transactions. It would have a freer hand to enforce its regulations.

In another departure from the pending Democratic bill, the Republican plan also would continue the practice of having federal laws override state laws. Under the Democratic proposal, states would be allowed to write and enforce tougher laws, a provision opposed by the financial industry.

Creating a new consumer financial protection entity within the government is a central piece of the Obama administration's regulatory package. Obama has said he would veto legislation that contained consumer protections he deems too weak.

more...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/05/AR2010050500411.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Video link to Elizabeth Warren's appearance on Morning Joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Neither plan will work. I certainly don't want the consumer protection division...
...to be part of the Fed - and it's inexcusable that the White House is blocking an audit of the Fed.

Neither the Republicans nor the administration is on the side of the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It definitely will not work, if it is further weakened.Weak as it is, it's significant step forward.
Remember, the CPFA Senate legislation can be further strengthened in conference with the House. Their CPFA legislation is stronger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm tired of Obama's bogus "steps forward" - why is he fighting a Fed audit? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Good question. I support Sanders' 'Audit the Fed' amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. What do you think a fed audit will reveal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Good question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. KR for more exposure..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. What ever happened to states' rights? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC