|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
bigdarryl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-07-10 02:09 PM Original message |
WTF!!! jobs created in April and the rates goes from 9.7% to 9.9%vwhat's up with that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-07-10 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
1. To be unemployed, you have to be looking, more people are now looking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richardo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-07-10 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
2. More long-term people who stopped looking are back in the job pool looking for work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-07-10 02:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Its definately a good sign. More people are now in fact employed than before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stopbush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-07-10 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
3. It's because more people who had "given up looking" have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dchill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-07-10 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
5. Simple math... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-07-10 02:18 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Simple math. 195,000 people re-entered the labor market. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quiller4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-07-10 02:29 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. No. People who had quit looking for work relaunch job searches as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-07-10 02:32 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dchill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-07-10 02:43 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Of course, you're correct... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrToast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-07-10 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
7. Hey Debbie Downer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-07-10 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
9. Actually what it means as Krugman explained earlier today is that people who had given |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhiteTara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-07-10 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
12. schools are graduating students and they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-07-10 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
13. Most likely, the job creation gave people greater hope, drawing more back into the job market. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aramchek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-07-10 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
14. you have to be smart enough to know what the number means in order to interpret it properly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-07-10 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
15. How many people need to properly explain this before the OP says "okay, I understand now" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-07-10 09:22 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. I think his point is that the ignorant masses, who just scan headlines, will be confused.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-07-10 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
16. Discouraged workers are starting to look for work again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madam Mossfern (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-07-10 04:31 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Ah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-07-10 04:57 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Total unemployment's still high... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madam Mossfern (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-07-10 05:05 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. The"WorkPays" program |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChimpersMcSmirkers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-07-10 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
20. Meh, it a mixed bag since until that numbers goes down, I don't think the dems will get credit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 13th 2024, 04:14 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC