Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Labrador, Ward say end votes for U.S. senators

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 11:59 PM
Original message
Labrador, Ward say end votes for U.S. senators
TREASURE VALLEY — Frontrunner Republican congressional candidates who want to take election of U.S. senators away from a public vote have surprised some political observers.

First Congressional District candidates Raul Labrador and Vaughn Ward both said they want to repeal the 17th Amendment of 1913. The amendment to the Constitution took elections of U.S. senators away from state legislatures and put them in the hands of the public.

Idaho Democratic Party Executive Director Jim Hansen calls Ward’s and Labrador’s position on the issue “bizarre” and “odd.”

But Ward and Labrador say it’s a state’s rights issue. The 17th Amendment has contributed to an erosion of state’s rights and to a too-powerful federal government, Ward said.

http://www.idahopress.com/news/article_bc420668-58d1-11df-beb8-001cc4c002e0.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sorry, but the 17th Amendment was put in place so the Senate
wasn't TOTALLY a House of Lords.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. lol -- I don't see that movement building a groundswell
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. Those "populists" who want to take away ordinary citizens' votes for Senators
thereby giving the right of senatorial selection to other politicians in state capitals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. This is such a strange new controversy.
It seems to have come from the same place as the teabagger phenomenon.

There are currently slightly more Democratic than republican governors. According to Wikipedia, there are 26 Democrats, 23 republicans and 1 Independent governor nationwide.

If the governors chose the senators, we would dominate the Senate. I don't understand why they are pushing this thing. I hope this idea fades quickly. It makes no sense at all to mix state and federal politics this way, with a misguided notion of states' rights. Of course, the republicans usually do a lot of yelling about states' rights when the Democrats are in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC