Here's an entry from July 2007, in where the "Democratic" short list is discussed,
and what I found about this blog is how indeed prescient the writers happen to be.
Note that Sotomayor was on the shortlist then as the top pick, and Kagen for the 2nd
vacancy. In addition, the writer kept insisting that Souter would be first to go.
This was before Barack Obama even decided to run for President.
Yes, I find the discussion in that 2007 blog quite interesting indeed.
Did I find bias? No much that I could discern at all.
http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/07/follow-up-to-the-democratic-not-so-short-list/and here's an analysis on Diane Wood
http://www.scotusblog.com/2009/05/nominee-analysis-judge-diane-wood/As for Scotusblog.....
Our PoliciesErin Miller | Monday, January 25th, 2010 7:24 pm
Our Guiding Philosophy:
SCOTUSblog aims to comprehensively cover the work of the Supreme Court.
SCOTUSblog is an impartial, journalistic entity. We exist to provide readers with objective information. We always clearly identify the limited commentary we publish.
We also attempt to avoid any appearance of bias or favoritism, including towards the clients of the attorneys who work on the blog. If at all possible, we avoid publishing pieces favoring one side of a case; we will instead have pieces with contrasting views.
With respect to the cases of the firms with relationships with the blog (Akin Gump and Howe & Russell), our roles are uniformly disclosed in any discussion of that case (even when we do not appear on the briefs). If one of the firms works on a case, an attorney from that firm will not write about the case on the blog, except in the rare instance that we cannot find another author. The previous practice of noting new Supreme Court filings by the lawyers who work on the blog and the clinics with which they are affiliated has been eliminated.
The blog never seeks to influence the Court’s decision making. We are aware that the blog is widely read within the Court, however. So we have adopted policies intended to avoid any appearance of impropriety. The decision whether to highlight any petition in a separate post is made exclusively by Lyle Denniston in his own discretion. As noted, we no longer highlight our own briefs, including our own cert. petitions. The Petitions to Watch feature now never comments on our own cases – separately listing them – to avoid any possibility that we would favor them.
Our Staff and Editorial Structure:
The blog is the product of the collective effort of a number of people. Some have principally editorial roles; others are principally involved with content.
Tom Goldstein is the Publisher, with responsibility for blog policies. He spends a lot of time thinking about ways to improve the blog. Tom is a partner at Akin Gump, where he is the Presiding Co-Chair of the firmwide Litigation Management Committee and also Co-Chair of the Supreme Court practice. Tom also is a lecturer at Harvard and Stanford Law Schools.
Amy Howe is the Editor, with responsibility for editing almost all of our posts. Amy is a partner at Howe & Russell (with Kevin Russell, see below) and also a lecturer at Harvard and Stanford.
Erin Miller is the Manager with overall responsibility for implementing the changes to the blog that Tom is constantly suggesting and developing blog content. Erin is employed by the blog.
Anna Christensen and Adam Schlossman are the Assistant Managers and work with Erin, as well as on the daily round-ups and a variety of special projects. Anna is the manager of Howe & Russell. Adam is Tom’s assistant at Akin Gump.
Lyle Denniston is the Reporter. He is the Dean of the Supreme Court press corps. Lyle is employed by the blog.
Adam Chandler (a law school 2L), Jay Willis (bound for law school next year), and Matt Sundquist (an intern for the blog) write the daily round-ups, along with Anna and Adam Schlossman.
David Stras writes the Academic Round-up. David is a Professor at the University of Minnesota School of Law.
Kevin Russell writes about a variety of issues, including civil rights cases. Kevin is the other attorney (with Amy) at Howe & Russell.
Lisa McElroy writes our regular “plain English” posts that summarize and explain our coverage of the Court in language accessible to non-lawyers. She is a Professor at the Earle Mack School of Law at Drexel University.
We occasionally have guest contributors as well.
http://www.scotusblog.com/our-policies/