|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 09:16 AM Original message |
What Glenn Greenwald Got Wrong about the Constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 09:19 AM Response to Original message |
1. This is an old article. Is this the only piece you could find to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 09:20 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. So you support the Supreme Court ruling that companies are people, just like Greenwald |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 09:22 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I didn't defend a word. I questioned your point in posting an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 09:24 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. His dishonest and hate filled article has been posted Ad nauseam here on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 09:28 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Like I said, the best you can do is a 4 month old article? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 09:30 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Wrong as usual, here is some seriously damning dirt on this creep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fortune (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 09:50 AM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Huh? Greenwald has slammed Goldman Sachs in the past |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 09:52 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. He wasn't slamming them when he worked for them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:04 AM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Elena Kagan also worked for Goldman Sachs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:06 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. link????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:09 AM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Possible Supreme Court pick had ties with Goldman Sachs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:11 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. So she didn't work for Goldman Sachs but was on an advisory panel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:13 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. She took money directly from Goldman Sachs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:14 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. But, not as much as Greenwald!11!!1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:16 AM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Greenwald supports Goldman Sach's personhood, that says it all about him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:18 AM Response to Reply #31 |
36. He supports absolute freedom of speech. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:18 AM Response to Reply #36 |
39. no he doesn't as the average citizen's voice will be drowned out by corporate millions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:20 AM Response to Reply #39 |
44. You want to limit unions and progressive activist organization's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:19 AM Response to Reply #36 |
42. LOL. "Absolute freedom of speech" is probably the best Murdoch style spin I've seen on the CU case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fortune (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 11:59 AM Response to Reply #31 |
97. You falsely state that Greenwald assigns "personhood" to corporations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:18 AM Response to Reply #29 |
37. This is true, Greenwald obviously took so much money from Goldman that he has time to do nothing but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fortune (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 12:07 PM Response to Reply #29 |
100. When, and in what capacity, did Greenwald work for Goldman Sachs? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:16 AM Response to Reply #28 |
32. Kagan doesn't want to make Goldman Sachs a citizen like Greenwald does |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:19 AM Response to Reply #32 |
41. Actually you don't know that she doesn't. She has no judicial record. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:24 AM Response to Reply #41 |
50. She argued against Citizens United in the Supreme Court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 03:20 PM Response to Reply #50 |
108. SHE HAS NO JUDICIAL RECORD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 06:55 PM Response to Reply #108 |
141. Now you are just not making sense. She argued against Citizen United |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:17 AM Response to Reply #28 |
35. She didn't take money from anyone. She EARNED money while LEGALLY employed as an advisor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:19 AM Response to Reply #35 |
40. Including Greenwald. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:20 AM Response to Reply #40 |
45. The OP is just playing the same game you and others play here all the time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:21 AM Response to Reply #45 |
47. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:19 AM Response to Reply #35 |
43. but President Obama may pick her for the Supreme Court so she must be bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:23 AM Response to Reply #43 |
48. but President Obama may pick her for the Supreme Court so she must be good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:25 AM Response to Reply #48 |
52. Logic escapes that one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 11:39 AM Response to Reply #52 |
89. If only you understood the concept of logic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 12:03 PM Response to Reply #89 |
99. Look at your screen name. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:25 AM Response to Reply #48 |
53. Sorry but I don't buy into your concept that there must be knee jerk opposition to President Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:29 AM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Sorry but I don't buy into your concept that there must be knee jerk suport to President Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:30 AM Response to Reply #55 |
60. One doesn't need to have "knee jerk support" for the Presidennt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:34 AM Response to Reply #60 |
68. lol. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:35 AM Response to Reply #68 |
70. Sadly I could see thinking being open minded as funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:36 AM Response to Reply #70 |
71. Keep it coming! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 05:24 PM Response to Reply #71 |
128. well if a poster who think laughing icons are the height of intellect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fortune (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 12:09 PM Response to Reply #43 |
101. Didn't Greenwald support Sotomayor before and after Obama picked her? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 05:23 PM Response to Reply #101 |
127. nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 04:23 PM Response to Reply #127 |
161. link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jefferson23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 07:44 PM Response to Reply #26 |
164. Greenwald's connections? Did you read the wiki link that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 04:01 PM Response to Reply #15 |
111. So when will your acknowledgment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 11:48 AM Response to Reply #4 |
95. How don't care how old the article is.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 10:43 AM Response to Reply #4 |
160. he's a hero because he hates obama. meanwhile in the real word, he's some dipshit blogger no one has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 09:36 AM Response to Reply #2 |
10. Why do people like you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 09:53 AM Response to Reply #10 |
16. because "people like me" care about Americans and want to protect them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:18 AM Response to Reply #16 |
38. LOL. Spare me your neo lib version of "care". nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:38 AM Response to Reply #38 |
74. "caring" is what drives me to hold mostly liberal views |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 12:00 PM Response to Reply #74 |
98. neo-liberal. There is a differnce. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 05:06 PM Response to Reply #98 |
119. "neo liberal"? Stupid labels don't make your case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:30 AM Response to Reply #16 |
59. Care all you want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:39 AM Response to Reply #59 |
75. I suggest you look at the link I provided that clearly shows the flaws in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 11:03 AM Response to Reply #75 |
84. I've read it, thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 04:48 PM Response to Reply #84 |
115. You seemed to have skipped all the main points and heard only what you wanted to hear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 05:28 PM Response to Reply #115 |
130. Answer my question first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 05:30 PM Response to Reply #130 |
131. No, you were given a solid and compelling argument against yours and Greenwald's position and you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 05:37 PM Response to Reply #131 |
134. Gee, what a shock |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 05:40 PM Response to Reply #134 |
135. No I wasn't shocked by your out of hand dismissal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 07:07 PM Response to Reply #135 |
143. Duck, dodge, weave |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 07:11 PM Response to Reply #143 |
144. Your self declarations of victory are laughable at best |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
5. Man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 09:31 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Perhaps that's why he opposes Kagan, she might want to over turn People United |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 05:48 PM Response to Reply #8 |
136. he just dislikes anything Obama does |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 05:07 PM Response to Reply #5 |
120. Now that greenwald defends them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 09:32 AM Response to Original message |
9. One important note, Greenwald has never gotten anything right. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:07 AM Response to Reply #9 |
22. So you disagree with all his many scathing criticisms of BushCo and its MSM enablers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:42 AM Response to Reply #22 |
79. Anyone with half a brain was critical of George Bush, that doesn't buy him any credibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:39 AM Response to Reply #9 |
76. I agree. He's been way off way often. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 11:36 AM Response to Reply #9 |
86. I came to that conclusion a while back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fortune (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
11. The article is dated January, 2010 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 09:51 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. This hate monger's latest venom filled attack article has been posted repeatedly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 01:44 PM Response to Reply #11 |
106. its not the age of the article that is relevent its the degree that it shows Greenwald |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
12. Greenwald shouldn't pick a battle with Stevens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fortune (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 12:13 PM Response to Reply #12 |
102. Greenwald agrees with Stevens almost always |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 12:48 PM Response to Reply #102 |
105. That was not my meaning nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
17. It's obvious that Glenn Greenwald is an intellectually shallow professional shit-stirrer... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 09:59 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Funny that someone so clueless about the Constitution has the arrogance to comment on the Supreme |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:13 AM Response to Reply #18 |
27. What's even funnier: his loyal followers don't care how clueless he is re: the Constitution... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:17 AM Response to Reply #27 |
33. Greenwald is critical of Obama for the same thiings he was critical of Bush for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:31 AM Response to Reply #33 |
61. Um, no. He is siding w/BushCo forces on the Citizens-United decision, as detailed in the OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 11:57 AM Response to Reply #27 |
96. greenwald the human pretzel who used to work for goldman-sachs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 03:26 PM Response to Reply #96 |
109. If GS is so horrible then why did Obama accept GS campaign contributions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 04:11 PM Response to Reply #96 |
112. Can you cite when he was an employee of Goldman Sachs, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 05:03 PM Response to Reply #112 |
118. greenwald is the head baaaa baaaaa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 05:18 PM Response to Reply #118 |
125. Nice job of tearing down the goalposts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 05:25 PM Response to Reply #125 |
129. Why? They have been proven RIGHT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 05:33 PM Response to Reply #129 |
133. Proven right? Where and how? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 07:22 PM Response to Reply #129 |
163. And of course, crickets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 06:12 PM Response to Reply #125 |
138. greenwald doesn't give a shit when he spreads lies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 07:05 PM Response to Reply #138 |
142. Deleted message |
cornermouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
21. Desperation in motion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 05:08 PM Response to Reply #21 |
121. Yes, greenwald is a fucking desperate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
23. Greenwald strikes me as a very bright mind who is crippled by his bias |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:09 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. That's a pretty good take on things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:15 AM Response to Reply #23 |
30. He's as "biased" against Obama as he was againt Bush, for the EXACT SAME THINGS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:17 AM Response to Reply #30 |
34. Nope your assessment is flawed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:21 AM Response to Reply #34 |
46. So it's different when BuchCo eavesdrops without warrants than when ObamaCo does it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:25 AM Response to Reply #46 |
51. ANd, Obama's indefinite detentions are better than bush's too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:29 AM Response to Reply #51 |
58. Yep President Obama supported green energy, stem cell research, the poor, students |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:32 AM Response to Reply #58 |
63. Has Greenwald criticized Obama for any of those things? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:40 AM Response to Reply #63 |
77. He has criticized President Obama for opposing the Citizens United ruling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:55 AM Response to Reply #77 |
83. And yet you are unable to understand the concept that there some things OBAMA says/does that are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 11:44 AM Response to Reply #83 |
92. Oh I have no doubt you don't forgive the President for some perceived slight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 03:30 PM Response to Reply #92 |
110. Obama will make do just fine with the almost million bucks his last campaign got from Goldman Sachs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 04:47 PM Response to Reply #110 |
114. See that's not exactly true. President Obama made his money with small donations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:33 AM Response to Reply #58 |
66. I applaud most of his domestic efforts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:41 AM Response to Reply #66 |
78. Yet there are no posts of you applauding, why is that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:43 AM Response to Reply #78 |
80. Sure there are. You can find some if you search. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:29 AM Response to Reply #46 |
57. Yep President Obama supported green energy, stem cell research, the poor, students |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spiritual_gunfighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 05:12 PM Response to Reply #46 |
123. It is different to some people as you can see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cornermouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:24 AM Response to Reply #34 |
49. Yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:29 AM Response to Reply #49 |
56. Yep President Obama supported green energy, stem cell research, the poor, students |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cornermouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:33 AM Response to Reply #56 |
65. More desperation in motion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:37 AM Response to Reply #65 |
73. You failed to address a single point I raised |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:53 AM Response to Reply #73 |
82. You failed to address what Greenwald had to say about them re Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 11:45 AM Response to Reply #82 |
94. Gleenwald thinks the President was wrong to defend us against corporate domination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 12:38 PM Response to Reply #73 |
103. They addressed three of your points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 04:49 PM Response to Reply #103 |
117. Yet you couldn't list a single one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 05:14 PM Response to Reply #117 |
124. Deleted message |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 05:51 PM Response to Reply #117 |
137. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:33 AM Response to Reply #56 |
67. Please point out where Greenwald has criticized Obama for that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:36 AM Response to Reply #67 |
72. President Obama criticized quite vehemently Citizens United |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:52 AM Response to Reply #72 |
81. I'm not talking about Citizens United. I'm talking about the other things you mentioned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 11:40 AM Response to Reply #81 |
90. We are talking a Supreme Court justice so nothing is more important than the worst ruling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 12:42 PM Response to Reply #90 |
104. It was not the worse ruling in history. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 04:49 PM Response to Reply #104 |
116. This one has the potential to END OUR DEMOCRACY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 06:28 PM Response to Reply #116 |
162. Are you familiar with those cases? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:34 AM Response to Reply #30 |
69. Greenwald has been consistent in his rabid bias. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:28 AM Response to Reply #23 |
54. Critical thinking = "bias" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:31 AM Response to Reply #54 |
62. Glenn Greenwald has not shown any 'thinking" much less any of a critical nature |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:32 AM Response to Reply #54 |
64. Relax, brentspeak. The next thing I say is as unpredictable as a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 11:38 AM Response to Reply #23 |
88. As I've said above, I unsubscribed to his crap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 11:44 AM Response to Reply #88 |
93. Hi, HughMoran. Good for you. And I have no qualms about the guy's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
85. Deleted message |
Phoebe Loosinhouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
87. I think Glenn Greenwald is more consistant than most |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 11:43 AM Response to Reply #87 |
91. Greenwald's support for the Citizen United ruling shows he is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
107. The smear machine appears to be running on all cylinders. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 04:45 PM Response to Reply #107 |
113. You are of course referring to Greenwald, who clearly is a master at smearing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 05:09 PM Response to Reply #113 |
122. But, he's a coward..he can smear his ass off.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 05:23 PM Response to Reply #122 |
126. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 05:30 PM Response to Reply #122 |
132. Deleted sub-thread |
freddie mertz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 07:42 AM Response to Reply #113 |
148. No, I wasn't. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CBR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 06:38 PM Response to Reply #107 |
139. Kagan is a witch? Thanks to Glenn for letting me know! The |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 06:53 PM Response to Reply #139 |
140. She turned me into a newt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 07:44 AM Response to Reply #140 |
150. That explains it, then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 09:44 PM Response to Reply #139 |
147. Deleted message |
freddie mertz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 07:42 AM Response to Reply #139 |
149. Silly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CBR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 08:51 AM Response to Reply #149 |
154. What is silly is decrying the "smear machine" while engaging in it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
145. Greenwald's wrong on this one- but he's right about Holder and Kagan's abandonment of principles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 07:56 PM Response to Reply #145 |
146. Deleted sub-thread |
freddie mertz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 07:58 AM Response to Original message |
151. Greenwald is this week's Emmanuel Goldstein. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 08:47 AM Response to Reply #151 |
153. Greenwald is getting what he deserved, he was dishonest in his attacks on the President's supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 09:39 AM Response to Reply #153 |
155. Forgive me if I am unmoved. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 09:41 AM Response to Reply #155 |
156. Principled and Greenwald should not be used in the same sentence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 09:47 AM Response to Reply #156 |
157. I expected too much I guess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 09:50 AM Response to Reply #157 |
158. What hurts OUR cause is your efforts to undermine our DEMOCRATIC President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 10:23 AM Response to Reply #158 |
159. Nonsense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 08:49 PM Response to Reply #153 |
166. You showed him a thing or two, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 08:38 AM Response to Original message |
152. Deleted message |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
165. He's clueless about Kagan's legal briefs, too. SCOTUSBlog has refuted his bullshit attacks on her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flaneur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:59 AM Response to Original message |
167. Slimy hack tactics by the OP. This is really embarrassing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 02:34 PM Response to Reply #167 |
168. "slimey hack tactics"? look at yourself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 11th 2024, 03:23 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC