Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kagan likes "real Democrats -- not closet Republicans...committed to liberal principles..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 06:59 AM
Original message
Kagan likes "real Democrats -- not closet Republicans...committed to liberal principles..."
Yet as a young writer for The Princetonian, the student newspaper at Princeton, Ms. Kagan offered clear insight into her worldview. She had spent the summer of 1980 working to elect a liberal Democrat, Liz Holtzman, to the Senate. On Election Night, she drowned her sorrow in vodka and tonic as Ronald Reagan took the White House and Ms. Holtzman lost to "an ultraconservative machine politician," she wrote, named Alfonse D'Amato.

"Where I grew up -- on Manhattan's Upper West Side -- nobody ever admitted to voting for Republicans," Ms. Kagan wrote, in a kind of Democrat's lament. She described the Manhattan of her childhood, where those who won office were "real Democrats -- not the closet Republicans that one sees so often these days but men and women committed to liberal principles and motivated by the ideal of an affirmative and compassionate government."

It was perhaps the last time Ms. Kagan wrote so openly of her own political beliefs. Last year, at her confirmation hearing to become solicitor general, senators focused less on her politics, but on whether she was too much in the ivory tower, with too little lawyerly experience to argue cases before the nation's highest court. That question will almost certainly come up again, given that Ms. Kagan has never been a judge.

"One of the things I would hope to bring to the job is not just book learning, not just the study that I've made of constitutional and public law, but of a kind of wisdom and judgment, a kind of understanding of how to separate the truly important from the spurious," Ms. Kagan said. "I like to think that one of the good things about me is that I know what I don't know and that I figure out how to learn it when I need to learn it."

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10130/1057069-84.stm?cmpid=news.xml#ixzz0nWj7ai1E

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Rec
Edited on Mon May-10-10 07:03 AM by rpannier
If for no other reason than the people opposed to her nomination are out in force

I learned that the hard way

There needs to be some solid balance in this 'discussion'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'll second rpannier's rec.
I like Elena Kagan's instinct for wishing to learn. A lot of U.S. citizens abandon that instinct very early in their lives, many at their high school graduation ceremonies. With Kagan it sounds like a lifelong commitment.

As for her scholarship in and of itself, I respect that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. ok, I am starting to feel pretty good about her as a justice. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lillypaddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. me, too.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. Justices often seem to grow (or show they are) more progressive once appointed.
I hope for the same with Ms. Kagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeJG Donating Member (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. you're nuts! it's more of Bush tyranny!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. you forgot the "1" in your "!!!"
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. She seems to be quite passionate about this--I think the Greenwald wing
is running out of things to dislike her for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. That's a New York liberal for ya.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC