Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tea Party-Backed Repeal Of The 17th Amendment Gets Republicans Into Trouble

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 08:55 PM
Original message
Tea Party-Backed Repeal Of The 17th Amendment Gets Republicans Into Trouble

Tea Party-Backed Repeal Of The 17th Amendment Gets Republicans Into Trouble

Evan McMorris-Santoro

There are signs that tea party calls to repeal the 17th Amendment -- taking the selection of U.S. Senators out of the hands of voters and putting it in the hands of state governments -- are proving to be a bridge too far for Republican candidates desperate to steal some of the movement's mojo. In the past couple weeks, at least two mainstream Republican candidates have found themselves walking back from pledges to support repealing the amendment, suggesting there's a limit to how much support the tea parties can provide.

The "Repeal The 17th" movement is a vocal part of the overall tea party structure. Supporters of the plan say that ending the public vote for Senators would give the states more power to protect their own interests in Washington (and of course, give all of us "more liberty" in the process.) As their process of "vetting" candidates, some tea party groups have required candidates to weigh in on the idea of repeal in questionnaires. And that's where the trouble starts.

In Ohio, Steve Stivers -- the Republican attempting to unseat Democratic Rep. Mary Jo Kilroy in the state's 15th District -- came under fire from Democrats when it was revealed he had checked the box saying he would repeal the 17th Amendment on a tea party survey (see question 11 here).

Kilroy's campaign set up a website slamming Stivers for the stance, and attacked him in the press.

Stivers flip-flopped almost immediately, telling the Columbus Dispatch that despite the survey (and a January quote in The Hill), he didn't know what he was saying when he called for an end to Senators elected directly by the people they represent.

"I made a mistake," Stivers told the paper. "I answered that question wrong. It was not intentional."

In Idaho, Republican Vaughn Ward is in a similar pickle. Ward, the NRCC's choice to challenge Rep. Walt Minnick (D), is currently locked in a primary fight with state Rep. Raul Labrador. As happens so often in Republican primaries these days, the candidates are doing their best to appeal to the ultra-conservative vote. (And considering that Minnick is the lone Democrat to be called a Hero by the Tea Party Express, we're talking extra tasty crispy conservative here.)

more

It's alive!

:rofl:





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Those Republicans sure make a lot of "mistakes".
Tell me again why they are so good and should be in charge? :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just weasels..who the fock would ever want to mix it
up with the teabaggers? How damn stupid do you have to be? Oh wait.. http://www.plunderbund.com/2009/12/20/me-bob-brigham-jane-hamshers-staffer/

Tim Russo:thumbsup::thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Makes you wonder
What other Amendments the Tea Baggers want to repeal? Maybe the 13th so that they can get rid of unions and go back to using slaves, and even the 14th to guarantee no more anchor babies, like Michelle Malkin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. oh my word.
they are some whack jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. They are so stupid
Repealing the 17th would in all likely hood increase the number of Democrats in the Senate, as many legislatures in red states are controlled by Democrats. Even though a lot of those Democrats are blue dogs, they wouldn't hesitate to vote in Democrats over Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Seriously, I can't help thinking that this would kill off every Northeastern Republican.
Scott Brown, Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, and Judd Gregg would all be booted out in favor of Democrats--they don't get that, do they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capt. America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm sure they wouldnt mind repealing the 19th as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. Wow, I had no idea that was part of the teabagger platform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. So keep the 10th amendment but repeal the 17th?
And the 1st amendment only applies when they agree with the speaker.

The Constitution according to teabaggers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. Maroons
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
11. This shows the depth of the mental defectiveness of the tea bagger party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC