|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
LeftyAndProud60 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 06:23 PM Original message |
Do u think this bribing scandal is more about Obama or more about Sestak? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
1. Sestak. WH may have made some vague offer re if he didn't want to stay in the House but that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 06:37 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I agree with you Pirate. I think Sestak is a bit of a loose cannon. I can't realy trust him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 07:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
16. If "loose cannon" you mean honest. Then yes, WYSIWYG. How very refreshing. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 07:23 PM Response to Reply #2 |
21. I agree 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFLforever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 06:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. That's how it appears to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 06:50 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. I cant figure out why he played it up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 07:17 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Wait. This news came out months ago, it was FOX who's spinning this as recent. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 07:18 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. He mentioned it during the primary battle and, after he won, he was too proud to own up to his own |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 07:24 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. How do you know it was an exaggeration? Rendell was downright nasty and Rahm was not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
3. It's more about Republican nontroversies, and the suckers who believe them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 06:40 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. You mean those that post about this non-issue all of the time? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 06:40 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. They'd be one or the other, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingofalldems (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 06:52 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. This and Blumenthal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 06:50 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Yeah, it says more about the repus and the corporatemediawhores |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
7. Closer to Bill Clinton's BJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sky Masterson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
8. It isn't anything more than republicans trying to muddy the Obama waters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Tiger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
10. I think this "scandal" only exists in the hopes of the Reich but it's definitely about Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
13. "non-issue" - same thing repubs said about watergate. time will tell all nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DearAbby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
14. According to the GOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
15. It's a made up scandal and the M$M lets FOX set the news agenda. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krawhitham (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
17. The WH has not spoken about it because they do not want to bury Sestak, he was just running ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 07:18 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Yes, it's just Rahm being his typical "polite." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krawhitham (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 07:27 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. YES because Rahm is the root of all EVIL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 07:31 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Yes, I think you have us all figured out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
23. I figure that they have to prove quid pro quo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
26. I think it's less a scandal and more Republicans wanting a Monica |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
27. I am outraged that somebody made a job offer. Totally outraged. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hay rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
28. Neither. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 11th 2024, 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC