Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

One constant with Obama's approval ratings...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 11:20 PM
Original message
One constant with Obama's approval ratings...
Edited on Mon May-09-11 11:22 PM by Drunken Irishman
They've never been awful. At least on average, anyway. I'm sure there were polls out there that had him with a bad approval rating - but overall, Obama has consistently pulled in respectable numbers. Even when he was having an awful summer last year.

Using RealClearPolitics' approval ratings http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_obama_job_approval-1044.html">average, Obama's approval has fallen below 45% roughly three times in his presidency and they never stayed that low for long.

That tells me Obama's floor is probably 45% - which is remarkable with how difficult things have been in his presidency the last two years and few months.

More impressively, though, is that Obama has generally led Republicans wire-to-wire. There have been some instances where the a certain Republican will bump ahead of Obama, but no candidate has been able to hold on to their lead over Obama.

Huckabee hasn't led against Obama since October of 2010 - in a poll done by CNN (he led by 8). Since April of last year, Huckabee has only managed to lead Obama in a poll five times.

Romney does a bit better - but still is way behind. He last led Obama in a poll back in April, and it was a paltry 2 points. Since April of last year, Romney has led Obama a total of seven times. To compare, Obama has led Romney in 37 polls. Yes, 37.

After that, it gets ridiculous. Pawlenty, Trump, Palin, Daniels, Bachmann or Paul have never led Obama in a reputable national poll. Gingrich has done it once. All the way back July 2010.

Folks, you can't dismiss those numbers. No candidate consistently even proves they're capable of being in the same ring as Obama, let alone capable of winning.

So while his approval numbers aren't awesome, his overall position is extremely strong heading into reelection. I'd even wager he's in better position than any candidate since Nixon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Real Risk is that With Control of So Many State Governments, the Repigs Could Steal the Election
The Repigs have complete control of at least 27 states with a total of 270 electoral votes.
They have been doing state takeovers of a number of Democratic strongholds.

They may be able to steal the election, even if it isn't particularly close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avant Guardian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. 20 year minimum for election fraud
...would be a good start
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama vs. TEN republicans - head to head polls
Here's the RCP link for the Obama vs. ten republicans 'head to head' poll page

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/president_obama_vs_republican_candidates.html

Looks to me like there is no one in those ten sections that have any chance of beating President Obama :)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yeah, that's what I was quoting...
Some bump ahead of him every now and then, but no candidate has sustained any type of lead against Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes, I figured that was probaby were you got your info, but....
I wanted to post the head-to-head link for the folks that didn't have it.
It's a good link to bookmark and keep an eye on ;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obama is blessed with staggeringly-awful competition
Edited on Mon May-09-11 11:34 PM by MannyGoldstein
If someone with a bit of gravitas who espouses traditional Democratic ideals runs against him, or a non-insane third party candidate runs against him, things will get interesting. For example, if CandidateObama ran against PresidentObama, the latter would be crushed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Bizarre and Unsupportable Hypothesis
You do realize Seth Myers was making a joke, right?

Just like when he said later "If your hair gets any whiter, the tea party will endorse it"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. There are boards on the net where people would agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. I think Seth Myers put it best on Saturday Night Live this weekend.
After Obama's ratings jumped to 56% after Bin Laden's death, "which means that nothing he can do will ever satisfy the other 46%."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. I tend to believe his ratings are far higher than indicated in the polls
We never get the full truth about anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. k&r....(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC