Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Greg Sargent's Plumline: The most consistent 2012 GOP hopeful thus far: Mitt Romney!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 03:32 PM
Original message
Greg Sargent's Plumline: The most consistent 2012 GOP hopeful thus far: Mitt Romney!
The most consistent 2012 GOP hopeful thus far: Mitt Romney!
By Greg Sargent

How did we get to the point where Mitt Romney — who in 2008 was the personification of ideological mallebility and opportunism — is actually turning out to be perhaps the most consistent of the 2012 GOP candidates?

Don’t laugh — it’s true.

Case in point: On Friday, Jon Huntsman, pressed to explain why he thought in 2009 that Obama’s stimulus was too small — a position that would be anathema to the right — insisted that he thought its tax cuts were too small. But now Steve Benen has turned up evidence that in fact Huntsman did say he thought more stimulus spending on the infrastructure was in order.

Indeed, Huntsman in 2009 also said flatly that the stimulus “probably wasn’t big enough.”

Okay, so we have Huntsman doing contortions on the stimulus. But he’s hardly the only 2012 GOP hopeful who is rapidly abandoning once-sensible positions in order to make himself acceptable to 2012 GOP primary voters. We have Newt Gingrich insisting up and down, against all evidence, that he never supported individual mandates, and he’s also twisting himself into knots over Ryancare. And we have Tim Pawlenty reversing himself and apologizing for his previous belief in the potential legitimacy of climate science.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/the-most-consistent-2012-gop-hopeful-thus-far-mitt-romney/2011/03/03/AF7Tvx9G_blog.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think their only hope is to draft Jebby at the convention..
That would certainly create some excitement at least amongst the simple-minded GOPers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. you mean, Willard's been consistently hopeful, right?
Willard may not make any mistakes, or limit himself to small ones, but can anyone actually visualize him winning the nomination? With Mittster care in his luggage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. The circular firing squad should be entertaining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. When did Mitt stop flopping?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marsala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. 2008. He ran out of new positions to take. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. No that's not true
He could have come out and said he hated himself. That would have at least been good for a laugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC