Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Conyers: Our involvement in Libya should be limited

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 04:46 PM
Original message
John Conyers: Our involvement in Libya should be limited

Our involvement in Libya should be limited

By Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.)

Today, I will propose an amendment that would prevent funds authorized in the National Defense Authorization Act from being used to fund any type of ground combat operations in Libyan territory.

My amendment would simply codify the policy endorsed by President Obama and the international community, and thereby ensure that our involvement in Libya remains limited in scope. I am proud to report that my amendment enjoys bipartisan support, including the endorsement of my colleagues Ms. Clarke, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Jones, Mr. Farr, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Honda, Mr. Kucinich, Mr. Johnson of Illinois, Ms. Lee, Mr. McClintock, Mr. George Miller, Mr. Stark, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Welch, and Ms. Woolsey.

Specifically, my amendment would prevent funds from being used to deploy, establish, or maintain a presence of members of the Armed Services or private security contractors on the ground in Libya. My amendment also contains an exception that would allow for the rescue of members of the Armed Forces participating in the NATO no fly zone operation.

<...>

In short, my amendment does not oppose the president’s policy; it would simply enact his promise into law. If at some point the president believes that our national security interests require a ground presence in Libya, he could come to the Congress and request an authorization for force, which if passed by both the House and Senate, would overrule this provision.

more



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. It should be limited to watching it on TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Northerner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC