Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SAY NO to the Reid plan that includes a Super Congress.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 03:49 PM
Original message
SAY NO to the Reid plan that includes a Super Congress.
They are announcing that the Reid plan does not affect Social Security and Medicare.

Maybe it doesn't right now. However, if a Super Congress is part of the plan, SS and Medicare cuts will be more easily passed in the near future, along with god knows what other legislation to transfer wealth from the poor and working class to the rich.

Once you give extra powers to the twelve most powerful and corporate-connected members of Congress, you have eliminated representative government. The Congress must represent all the states and all the people, not pick and choose the members who will pass legislation favorable to the banks and corporations...which will be the result if the Super Congress is permitted to take hold.

This sounds to me like holding back on the theft for now, in favor of implementing a STRUCTURE that will make the theft much easier in the near future.

I don't like the sound of this at all.

They will reap accolades for protecting Medicare and SS now, while removing our ability to protect ourselves in the future.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vroomvroom Donating Member (496 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Agreed..Super Congress is a BAD IDEA! So its inclusion == NO
Lets hope its not included
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtbymark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. the 'super majority' vote takes a constitutional amendment
in order to get that, you need a super majority in the house and senate, Prez's signature, and 3/4 of the states have to ratify it. Any constitutional amendment will never pass in this century (just like the last one)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. I also agree... K but R didnt work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Does the Reid plan include a Super Congress?
Has someone said it does or do you have a link to what the Reid plan includes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yes, it appears to.
Edited on Mon Jul-25-11 04:01 PM by woo me with science
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/25/super-congress-debt_n_909018.html


"Nevertheless, separate proposals put forward by Boehner and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) on Monday each included versions of a Super Congress -- referred to on the Hill as a Super Committee -- that would write laws that could not be amended by the regular Congress, only voted up or down. In Boehner's version, the debt ceiling would be raised a second time if Congress approved the cuts decided on by the Super Congress."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine1967 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Here are 2 TwitPics of the Reid plan:
http://twitpic.com/5vrb4u

And part 2, which I believe includes to verbiage being talked about: http://twitpic.com/5vrbn3

Hope that helps, Reid's plan is 2 pages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'll try to woo you with facts
Reid's plan does NOT include any "super congress" (the reaction to which is overblown in any case, IMHO).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Oops! Me bad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Seriously, this "super congress" bullshit is laughable.
It's twelve people who come out with some deficit reduction recommendations that then get voted on by the full Congress without any additional amendments. And people make it sound like these twelve would have the power to make law all on their own. It's horseshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Agree
not that much different from what happens all the time with committees and rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
great white snark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. It's the new cat food commission.
Recycled outrage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I still laugh at people who use the phrase "cat food commission."
Apparently it's not okay for the Republicans to try to groundlessly fearmonger to seniors about "death panels," but "cat food commission" isn't at ALL dishonest or inflammatory. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. It is still a bad idea IMHO
Enough with "gangs", commissions with a bunch of unelected members, etc. Congress just needs to do its job. They have committees to explore issues like the deficit and produce legislation to be debated and voted on by the full Congress. Solutions can be found if everybody in Congress is willing to take their jobs and commitment to the American people seriously. The current dysfunction seems to be the Republicans- the Tea Party in particular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. Nonsense.
It absolutely increases the ability to shove legislation through while bypassing the people. It restricts crafting of the legislation to a selected group, and it makes the legislation easier to push through. If it didn't they would not resort to this.

When we have already had Medicare and SS cuts on the table, creating a Super Congress for this particular purpose is extremely dangerous. These issues affect ALL the people, and the input of any state or group of people should not be watered down by any means, nor extraordinary powers given to a selected few. Sometimes it is just a few principled representatives who stand between us and the moneyed interests, and the moneyed interests know that.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=4933385
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. I don't think the super congress is in the Reid plan. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. It does appear to be in the plan.
Read upthread, two places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dana_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. yes it is
— Establishes Joint Congressional Committee to Find Future Savings. In addition to $2.7 trillion in concrete savings, the Senate package will establish a joint, bipartisan committee, made up of 12 members, to present options for future deficit reduction. The committee’s recommendations will be guaranteed an up-or-down Senate vote, without amendments, by the end of 2011.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/reids-plan/2011/07/11/gIQAHOl8YI_blog.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Sounds like an attempt to remove the GOP filibuster solution
And make the House GOPs actually cast a vote for or against particular cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Yes, it doesn't sound too terrible. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC