|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-01-11 04:12 PM Original message |
The Republic of Great Britain - think it will ever happen? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-01-11 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
1. The Royals are not a head of state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-01-11 04:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Yeah yeah yeah I know, but in all Commonwealth Nations(including the UK) monarch is head of state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shagbark Hickory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 10:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
19. Not unlike much of congress when you think about it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-01-11 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
3. Not in the near future anyway, people in the UK like the way it is now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David__77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-01-11 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
4. More likely Republic of England, Republic of Scotland, Republic of Wales. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-01-11 04:24 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. The further confederation of the British Empire... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-01-11 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
6. Sure, kid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-01-11 05:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Everyone judges each other's culture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-01-11 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
8. Of course we have royalty here, but they just aren't recognized with all of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DavidDvorkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-01-11 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
9. Most republics have a figurehead president as head of state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-01-11 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
10. England was a Republic, from 1649 till 1660 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasProgresive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-01-11 06:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. I'll take Liz II over Oliver (murderous bastard) Cromwell any day. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 10:08 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. Anyone who allied with a Cardinal of the Catholic Church can't be all that bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-01-11 06:24 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. As it turned out, it was an Inter-Regnum. HA! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 09:23 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. So was the First and Second French Republic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-01-11 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
11. Why? Honestly... Why? And how many Brits have you asked your question of? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-01-11 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
13. Do you have a problem also with Belgium, Spain, Monaco, et al.? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-01-11 06:40 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. I think that Sweden guy lives down the block from me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 09:43 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. We have our own variation of monarchy in the USA... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shagbark Hickory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 10:11 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. I dunno bout that one but some would say the kennedys were like royalty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 10:54 PM Response to Reply #13 |
26. Yes, but they don't get pushed at me as often. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brooklynite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
20. Bad for tourism... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 10:27 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Wrong. Turning Buckingham Palace into a park and museum would be GREAT for tourism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brooklynite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 10:51 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. You';d have to hire a cast to walk around wearing the gowns and jewelry... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
22. The Royals are nothing more than a fancy name ALREADY. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
24. YEAH they need a PRESIDENT, SENATE, and HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES just like the US of A |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dairydog91 (520 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
27. No: The weaker the royals, the more popular they get. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 10th 2024, 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC