Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My sources tell me it was actually Bush/Cheney who got Bin Laden

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Cyrano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 11:49 AM
Original message
My sources tell me it was actually Bush/Cheney who got Bin Laden
Edited on Sat May-07-11 11:59 AM by Cyrano
All the time George Jr. was pretending to clear brush on his “ranch,” and pretending to play golf, he was actually hunkered down with the CIA and military intelligence plotting Bin Laden’s demise.

Cheney talked Bush into invading Iraq as a diversion. The purpose was to give Bin Laden the false impression that he was no longer important.

Condi Rice’s real job at the White House was to track down the evil doer, while pretending to be involved with other issues.

Karl Rove planted stories that Bush was no longer interested in Bin Laden to make him think that he was off the American radar.

Donald Rumsfeld intentionally confused everyone with “There are known knowns and there are unknown knowns.” The point of this was to make Bin Laden think he was dealing with idiots.

Bush and company found out Bin Laden’s location recently and sent an anonymous note to the White House to let them know where he was. They also sent advice to use Navy Seals and send an extra helicopter.

At present, it seems that Barack Obama is the guy who nailed Bin Laden. But Bush and company will hold all of this information secret to use as an "October surprise" just before the 2012 election.

If you’re wondering how I know all this, I have a talkative friend at Fox “news.” And I’ve also run into Rush Limbaugh’s maid occasionally at bars down here in Palm Beach County. Two drinks and she’ll spill everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Listening to the comments
made by Republicans and anti-Obama naysayers, there are probably more than just a few who actually believe this to be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cyrano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Oh, c'mon Mz Pip. Would I lie about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Of course not!
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'll bet she's looking for work next week. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cyrano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Who? Limbaugh's maid. Her job is safe. She still picks up his
oxycontin at secret rendezvous points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. A drug runner, a criminal, criminals are hot!1! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cyrano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. There are no Republican criminals. Those who serve Republicans are not criminals.
Only Democrats are criminals. Especially black Democrats, Hispanic Democrats, and Muslim Democrats. But make no mistake about it. Most white Democrats are also criminals, but they're harder to spot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, if by "got" you mean "hired",
this might be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. But, are they "highly-placed sources, speaking only on
the condition of anonymity?" Otherwise, how can you trust them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC