Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Systemically Important' Label (For Nonbank Financial Firms) Divides U.S. Regulators - WSJ

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 12:24 PM
Original message
'Systemically Important' Label (For Nonbank Financial Firms) Divides U.S. Regulators - WSJ
'Systemically Important' Label Divides U.S. Regulators
By VICTORIA MCGRANE - WSJ
May 6, 2011

<snip>

CHICAGO — Federal regulators appeared divided Thursday over what to reveal about how they would decide which nonbank financial firms should get the "systemically important" label for being big enough to threaten the financial system. Firms with such a designation would be subject to stricter capital standards and regulations.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chairman Sheila Bair said in a speech at a conference here that regulators needed to "move forward and develop some hard metrics to guide" the designation process. She told reporters that "the more public information we can provide on this, the better."

However, Mark Van Der Weide, a senior associate director at the Federal Reserve, stressed the need for regulators to retain discretion in the process and warned: "Don't expect perfectly clear numerical guidelines from us."

The Financial Stability Oversight Council, set up by Congress last year in revamping financial-oversight laws, is deciding which nonbank financial firms will get the label. The Fed and the FDIC are both members of the council.

It is in dispute whether a financial firm labeled systemically important would be less or more likely to be bailed out by the government if it ran into trouble. The Dodd-Frank law aims to prevent future government bailouts by imposing stricter rules on such firms and giving regulators tools to dismantle them in an orderly way in a crisis.

<snip>

More: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704810504576305523089555728.html

:wtf:

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC