CCR Attys Who Represented Al Aulaqi Father in Challenge to CIA JSOC Kill List Denounce Strike

May 7, 2011, New York – Today, the Center for Constitutional Rights issued the following statement in response to yesterday’s reports of an attempt by the U.S. to kill Anwar Al-Aulaqi by drone strike in Yemen:

We are deeply concerned about reports of resumed strikes in Yemen aimed at U.S. citizen Anwar Al-Aulaqi, whose addition to secret kill lists maintained by the CIA and the U.S. military’s Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) based on secret criteria was announced last year.

The use of lethal force against Al-Aulaqi in Yemen, a country against which the United States is not at war, is illegal under the U.S. Constitution and international law in all but the narrowest circumstances – as a last resort to protect against a concrete, specific, and imminent threat of death or serious physical injury. U.S. officials are obliged to comply with these standards.

Notwithstanding the government’s allegations against Al-Aulaqi, he has never been given any form of process that would be due a U.S. citizen or any individual before execution by the state. The executive’s policy of targeting suspects based only on its own say-so also poses the real risk that the government, which has clearly made mistakes, as the past decade has shown, will target the wrong people.

It is shameful that at a time when the people of Yemen and the Middle East are struggling for the rule of law, human rights and democracy, and protesting against violence by their governments, the U.S. is resuming strikes for which there is no transparency or accountability, and only escalating violence.

On August 30, 2010, the Center for Constitutional Rights and the ACLU filed suit on behalf of Anwar Al-Aulaqi’s father, Nasser Al-Aulaqi, against President Obama, CIA Director Panetta, and Defense Secretary Gates, challenging their decision to authorize the targeted killing of his son as a violation of the Constitution and international law. In December 2010, the district court dismissed the suit on grounds that Nasser Al-Aulaqi did not have legal standing to challenge the targeting of his son, and that the case raised "political questions" not subject to court review. The court never ruled on the merits of the case, and indeed, noted that it raised “stark and perplexing questions.”

http://ccrjustice.org/newsroom/press-releases/ccr-attys-who-represented-al-aulaqi-father-challenge-cia-jsoc-kill-list-denounce-strike

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

They'll bed down with Republicans and Bushes and anyone else Obama is told to do business with by the people he represents. Or maybe more tragically, maybe he does what he wants.

Maybe we needed four more years of Bush to keep the anti-war movement going, to keep generating anger against things like extra-judicial executions which airc were only theory under Bush and vehemently opposed by the 'left'. Or to keep up the hearings, which seem to have gone away almost unnoticed, into the firing of the AGs for political reasons, and all the other issues.

What happened to Leahy's committee on torture, his committee on restoring Habeas Corpus, Karl Rove's subpoenas? We were at least hopeful back then. But now, it's as if a spell has come over democrats and everything this president does that would have and did cause outrage when Bush even suggested it, is now either greeted with silence or outright support and apologetics. As if you can excuse violating the oath of office.

Or maybe more tragically, maybe he does what he wants. And that is what we will have to figure out over the next year and a half.

"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent."
Thomas Jefferson

PB