Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rules Barred Only Black Firefighter at NY Fire Station Where Obama Visited Because He Was Off-Duty

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 09:10 PM
Original message
Rules Barred Only Black Firefighter at NY Fire Station Where Obama Visited Because He Was Off-Duty
Secret Service Rules Barred Only Black Firefighter at NY Fire Station Where Obama Visited Because He Was Off-Duty

The Secret Service has its rules.

As a result, the lone black firefighter at the Midtown firehouse — Engine 54, Ladder Company 4 — visited by President Obama on Thursday wasn’t allowed to be there, the New York Times reported.

”Secret Service only wanted the people that were working that tour there, and it is unfortunate that some provisions could not be made for the only black firefighter in the firehouse to be there also,” said Michael Marshall, a fire lieutenant in the department and the first vice president of the Vulcan Society, an organization of black firefighters.

The Times reported that the black firefighter, Patrice G. McLeod, and more than 30 other off-duty firefighters were not given permission to attend. The station lost 15 firefighters on 9/11.

The Times reported that McLeod showed up anyway along with other high ranking department members who apparently were not vetted by the Secret Service for the visit. But they were all told they had to leave.

http://www.ticklethewire.com/2011/05/06/secret-service-rules-barred-only-black-firefighter-at-ny-fire-station-from-being-there-when-obama-visited-because-he-was-off-duty/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why weren't they put "on duty" for the visit?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. That seems like such a strange rule. I wonder why they do that. Well, I just
Edited on Sat May-07-11 09:44 PM by RKP5637
answered my own question, I guess it's cause it could increase significantly the number of people they would have to check out. Now it makes sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. I don't think it is the number in this case. More likely, they weren't vetted
because they didn't know they would be there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. You find the most interesting and informative stuff.
I'm seriously conflicted on this though.

Consider this scenario: Had the Secret Service changed its rule to accomodate the "only black firefighter", and something happened, SOMEONE would have said the rules were relaxed BECAUSE President Obama is black.

I'd bet my bad reputation on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Why should they? It just so happened O was visiting when the black firefighter was off duty.
Edited on Sat May-07-11 10:02 PM by FLAprogressive
Why should an exception be made? Isn't that discriminatory?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Well that's kind of my point, sorta.
Had an exception been made, it would have seemed the exception was racially motivated. Had the exception been made, and something happened, someone would have SCREAMED that the exception was racially motivated, but for the opposite reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. So what? 30 other off duty fire fighters also didn't get to meet Obama
I'm sure some of them were very disappointed as well. I know I would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. He was one of 31 that were banned. Race was not a factor at all.
I would assume these rules are in place to avoid too many people and for the safety of the president.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dems_rightnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. And to give
... the Secret Service a chance to background check the people who will be there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
29. Oh please. There would have been 45 people there.
The SS can easily check that number. The president is often in rooms with hundreds of people and more. Very easy to check 45 people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillowTree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. He should have been given preferential treatment because he's black?
Isn't that what's called discrimination?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Are you referring to how he got the job or seeing the prez? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I believe she's referring to seeing the prez. Why should the black firefighter get an exception to
the "on duty" rule? Other off-duty firefighters from that station didn't get to see the President either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillowTree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. I won't dignify that question with a direct response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Rules are rules. Did the black firefighter complain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dems_rightnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I suppose he did
Not sure how else it would have become a story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whoneedstickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. Really, imagine the alternative. He was 'put on duty' or an exception made for him?
because his skin color 'matches' that of the president?

Headlines:

"Duty roster rigged for Black firefighter"

"Off duty firemen complain of preferential treatment for Black co-worker"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. Why should an exception to the "on duty" rule be made because the firefighter is black?
Way to make this a race issue when it isn't -- all off-duty firefighters were banned, not just the black one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
19. 30 couldn't meet Obama due to Secret Service..I wouldn't put it past
Obama to meet with these firefighters together at some point in the near future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOLALady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
22. Interesting.
It seems that New York doesn't have many Black Firefighters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
These Eyes Donating Member (360 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Yes...
That's the first thing I noticed about the story. I guess the more things change, the more they stay the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
23. Not a racial issue. Other off duty members of the station house were
turned away. Would have been wise of the Secret Service to make accommodations, but their job is to protect the Presidency of the United States of America. The number of chances that the Secret Service can take is zero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
25. My question is: why is there only one Black firefighter at this station?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shoutinfreud Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Because, sometimes, things just work out that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Firefighter unions in New York, Boston and Chicago
all worked to keep blacks out of fire fighter positions. Only recently has that relented. I am from Chicago where stories of white fire fighter union officials fighting to keep the stations white were in the paper constantly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. that is what I wonder too
That is something that really stood out on 9/11 - that there were so few black firefighters and police. I think they need to examine their hiring pratices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. So there needs to be a quota system, is what you're saying? Maybe they don't have a lot of black
applicants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. No quotah how about realities, in this day and time if I see few people of color or women in ...
...a workplace it's because the people at the top either want it that way or don't mind it being that way.

...again, reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. I asked a friend
who is black after 9/11 what he thought of that. He thinks that their hiring has a lot to do with being a relative of a firefighter. Don't knopw if that is accurate but it bears some investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOLALady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Or as post 30 said,
maybe the Fire fighters Union worked to keep Black applicants out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Sorry, I don't reply to right-wing anti-union screed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drew Richards Donating Member (507 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
37. They had not been vetted
Stop trying to make it about race...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC