Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Curious Bush-Bin Laden Symbiosis

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 01:33 PM
Original message
The Curious Bush-Bin Laden Symbiosis
Robert Parry asks: What ties together two people who seemingly have nothing in common?





The Curious Bush/Bin Laden Symbiosis

By Robert Parry (A Special Report)
May 7, 2011
ConsortiumNews

Since Osama bin Laden’s killing on May 1, it has become shockingly clear that the terrorist leader did not spend most of the last decade on the run or hiding in caves. He was holed up in the Pakistani city of Abbottabad enjoying the comforts of family life with his twenty-something-year-old latest wife.

And, while criticism has fallen on Pakistani authorities for being either complicit or incompetent, almost no attention has focused on the curious symbiotic relationship that has existed since 9/11 between Osama bin Laden and George W. Bush – and even longer between the bin Laden family and the Bush family.

At nearly every turn, President George W. Bush acted – presumably with incompetence, not complicity – in ways that enabled bin Laden to remain free, and the terrorist leader repaid the favor by surfacing at key political moments to scare the American people back into Bush’s arms.

Although Bush talked tough about getting bin Laden “dead or alive,” he consistently failed to follow through. In November 2001, when bin Laden and his top lieutenants were cornered at the Tora Bora mountain range in eastern Afghanistan, Bush ordered the U.S. military to prematurely pivot toward planning the next war with Iraq.

CONTINUED...

http://consortiumnews.com/2011/050711.html



Money.

According to George W Bush, it trumps peace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. ".... presumably with incompetence, not complicity ... "
Ahem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Bushes, BinLadens, UAE and Saudi royals have been aligned for decades. COMPLICIT!
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's plain as day to anyone who has stayed on top of BushInc the last 40 years. Bushes and BinLadens
have been on the same page for decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rec's are great...but, still need kicks
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. OK
--imm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Electric Monk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bush closes down CIA unit hunting OBL, just as OBL is settling into Abbotabad
Did some elites know and were they complicit in keeping OBL secret and safe? And if so, who participated? With the Bush and Bin Laden families being so close, (and OBL was also part of the upper echelons of Saudi intelligence, the house of Saud being another friend of the Bush family) is it possible that there was collusion to both shield OBL and keep him on ice/alive for the time being?

"We now know that Bush’s second term meant a continuation of bin Laden’s relative safety. In 2005, Bush closed down a special CIA unit that had been tracking bin Laden’s whereabouts for almost a decade, with its responsibilities merged with a broader counter-terrorism office.

In 2006, more information also surfaced about how Bush’s pivot to Iraq had protected bin Laden. Lt. Gen. John Vines told the Washington Post that his troops were within a half-hour of catching bin Laden but needed three drones to cover the escape routes. The general said only one drone was available because the others had been reassigned for service in Iraq.

According to new evidence that has surfaced since bin Laden’s death, it appears that early in Bush’s second term, bin Laden moved into the compound in Abbottabad, an hour-or-so drive from Pakistan's capital of Islamabad, where he set up house with family members, including his young wife."

Also from the article:

"A little more than a month after the CIA warning, on the morning of Sept. 11, George H.W. Bush and members of the bin Laden family were participating in a Carlyle Group investment meeting in Washington. It was disrupted by the machinations of another branch of the bin Laden family, when Osama’s al-Qaeda operatives hijacked planes and crashed them into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. According to one source, a bin Laden family member at the Carlyle meeting immediately sensed who was behind the terror attacks and removed his name tag."

Conveniently, (cough), while airlines were grounded after the 9/11 attacks, the Bin Laden family was allowed to leave the US without any detention or real interrogation. It's also interesting to note that GHW Bush was the former CIA chief with well known ISI connections which leads me to even more questions Octafish....

Thanks for a great article but I fear Robert Parry is skirting some even larger, darker, relationships and machinations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny2X2X Donating Member (356 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. Forgotten
Edited on Mon May-09-11 05:13 PM by Johnny2X2X
Great point. What is also being overlooked is that because of his failure in Tora Bora, Bush and his administration began a campaign to downplay and marginalize Bin Laden's importance. He was in fact in command and in control of Al Qaeda. He was the bigest and most dangerous threat top America yet these guys lied to make us feel safer. We know he was in control because of the mountain of intelligence he had with him when he died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. I wouldn't want to claim credit for any of this affair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. I wonder what they'll find in all the data they seized in the operation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. Wouldn't surprise me if the Bush family mailed the Bin Ladens a sympathy card.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. You should see their Facebook page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I bet it was hand delivered
By James Bath.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. K&R - many thanks once again for helping keep the dots connected. And thanks to Parry, of course. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. we'll probably....
....never know the truth, but one thing's for certain, it's not the party-line....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
18. ^ n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC