Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Michael Hayden's *WHOOPSIE*

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 05:35 AM
Original message
Michael Hayden's *WHOOPSIE*
Aired May 8, 2011 - 10:00 ET



ZAKARIA: So you took news of this courier in to President Bush many years ago, right?

HAYDEN: We did. I think it was about four years ago, in 2007. We - we had built up sufficient lead information on the name of the courier that we thought it was ready for presidential primetime. So we briefed it to the president, not as something eminent but as our most promising lead to track down Bin Laden because, frankly, Fareed, the trail had been quite cold for a - a long period of time.

ZAKARIA: And why had it been cold, General? Because you had these huge bounties out on his head, and one of the things that people used to always say to me in the region was, gosh, this guy must inspire fanatical devotion and loyalty. The Americans are willing to pay $25 million and nobody turns up to - to claim the reward.

HAYDEN: Yes. Well, a - a couple of thoughts on that.
.
.
.

HAYDEN: It is. But it also came out of detainee interrogations..
.
.
.
.
I can't go into detail, but, I can assure you, .... :eyes:

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1105/08/fzgps.01.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Smirk." - xCommander AWOL (R)
Edited on Tue May-10-11 06:21 AM by SpiralHawk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. "Americans are willing to pay $25 million and nobody turns up to - to claim the reward."
I think we could have offered $1 billion and no one would have claimed it. BUT - offer a decent reward, complete protection, and U.S. citizenship for yourself and your extended family - I wonder how many takers we might have gotten. Who wants to take the $25 million and be marked for vengeance? You'd be dead within a week, and probably your family too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. Senate subpoena could shed light on this issue.
Bush repeatedly failed -- due to incompetence, of course.

Thanks for the heads-up, Underpants!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. On another show check out Candy Crowley with the question never dared ask of the W crowd.
STATE OF THE UNION WITH CANDY CROWLEY

CROWLEY: And let me say I'm in no way questioning the bravery of guys who would drop into another nation against a guy who is the biggest terrorist in the world, but as you know, there has been a big brouhaha, because originally it was reported that Osama bin Laden was armed that he shielded himself with one of his wives.

Now he didn't do that. He didn't have weaponry. What do we know about what happened in those final moments In that room that you can tell me?

DONILON: Yeah. Let me review the circumstances though. We are at war with al Qaeda. Osama bin Laden is the leader of the entity that we're -- a group that we're at war with. Our forces went basically to their commander's headquarters here in Abbottabad, Pakistan. They entered the compound and were fired upon. They had to breach several walls and doors to get to where Osama bin Laden was. At no point during the course of this operation did Osama bin Laden indicate that he was prepared to surrender.

This is an organization known obviously for suicide bombing, IEDs, booby-trapping buildings. And our forces, no signal from him that he was prepared to surrender, acted completely appropriately. And I don't think anybody is going to second guess their judgment.

CROWLEY: Right. Well, I mean, I must say I think certainly in this country you're right, but I'm sure you've seen the web site that in other countries, for those who might be sympathetic with what they believed bin Laden to be, that the fact that he was unarmed and which I'm going to assume that your non-answer is that he was unarmed in the sense that he wasn't holding a weapon, and obviously he could have had all kinds of things nearby in all of that.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1105/08/sotu.01.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. Gee, that's a little earlier than August, 2010, isn't it? Condi has this to add:
Edited on Tue May-10-11 04:30 PM by leveymg
CONDOLEEZZA RICE, FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE: Pleasure to be with you.

ZAKARIA: When you first heard the news about Bin Laden's assassination, what - what did you think?

RICE: Well, I was incredibly gratified and, frankly, relieved. It been a long hunt for him. I was proud that over two presidencies we were persistent enough and patient enough to put together the picture that ultimately led to him. You don't just stumble upon Osama Bin Laden. It takes a lot of work to get there.

And I think it really closes a chapter in the book on al Qaeda, but not the whole book. But certainly a chapter. And President Obama and his team ought to be congratulated for doing that.

ZAKARIA: President Obama did say that he felt that the capture or killing of Bin Laden was not a top priority when he took office and he moved it to a top priority. What's your reaction?

RICE: Oh, it was a top priority. We wanted to get Osama Bin Laden every single day. And there was a unit at the - the agency that worked on nothing else.

And I remember actually when Mike Hayden told President Bush that they have discovered this courier, and that he had a brother. And we began to hear some of the details about it, and they went on his trail. It took this long. But, in fact, these - these leads developed quite a long time ago.
The agency and the military then acted on them.

And there's one other thing. The capacity of our military and our intelligence agencies to fight in this integrated fashion is something that developed over a long period of time, starting in Afghanistan in 2001.


Sure, Condi - finding UBL was a top priority - which is why the Bush White House closed the CIA UBL Issues Unit ("Alec Station"), when was that? Oh yes, in late 2005. Wasn't Bin Laden moved into the Abbottabad compound in mid-2005, or thereabouts? Interesting.


Not only moves the time-line back, kinda gives one cause to question the whole "we located UBL by watching his courier" cover-story, but the White House wasn't fully briefed until 2010, doesn't it?

Maybe, we had eyes-on UBL for a good long time during the Bush years, but for some reason, that fact never got acted upon.

Great catch - haven't seen these particular statements by Hayden and Rice repeated anywhere else.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Of course the RW and the rest of the media used his appearance to support their nonsense
I just happened to have the TV when this was on and literally stopped in my tracks when I heard this. "He didn't really just say that! He couldn't have" I think I muttered out loud. Backed up the DVR and yep he said it.

Zakaria lead with that (see the link) and though he didn't smirk he had to mean as a leading question. And Elmer Fudd walked right into the trap....oooooh that wascly wabbit!!! Foiweyadle again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC