http://www.zerohedge.com/article/blatant-wsj-revisionism-redlined-0Yesterday, when we posted the full original letter
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/true-finns-timo-soini-releases-statement-why-i-wont-support-more-bailouts submitted by True Finns leader Timo Soini titled "Why I Won't Support More Bailouts" as presented by the Wall Street Journal in verbatim, we were surprised that the WSJ, traditionally the bastion of various Fed interests (a topic previously dissected in "On The New York Fed's Editorial Influence Over The WSJ")
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/new-york-feds-editorial-influence-over-wsj , would allow such a truthy letter to appear on its pages.
Today, courtesy of Karl Denninger who pointed out something glaringly disgusting, we were forced to look again at the letter as it now appears on the website of the WSJ.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703864204576310851503980120.htmlShockingly, as the redline below indicates, the entire letter was scrubbed with blatant deletions from the original text which can still be found on the pages of Zero Hedge. It is high time that the WSJ readers demand to know whether this unprecedented scrubbing was due to an editorial intervention, or if Soini himself was responsible for this blatant revisionism. If the latter is indeed the case, perhaps supporters of the True Finn party in Finland should inquire who it was that forced their leader to adjusted his letter in such a way. And here we are making fun of Jean Claude Junker for openly lying to the media...
Full redline comparing the pre- and post-revision letter versions (pdf)
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/WSJ%20Revisionism.pdfsnip
http://www.scribd.com/doc/55122829/WSJ-Revisionism