Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bwaaahahahaha! From the National Review:The GOP Stupids Step Out

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 08:20 AM
Original message
Bwaaahahahaha! From the National Review:The GOP Stupids Step Out
I can’t tell you how excited I am at the news that good ol’ SpongeBob is throwing his and Callista’s Squarepants into the ring for the Stupid Party’s 2012 designated-loser/presidential-candidate sweepstakes, thus joining an already crowded field of unelectables, has-beens, never-wases, never-will-be’s, who’s-he mystery men, libertarians, radical libertarians, pizza guys, former governors of Minnesota, and just plain nut jobs. Way to go, GOP! No wonder we call you the Stupid Party. You’ve earned it.

Not that Mr. Newt isn’t brilliant. He could probably whip us all on Jeopardy, especially if they asked real questions about history and stuff, instead of about Justin Bieber and Lady Gaga. But he was born in 1943, which makes him six years older than my dad, the sainted “Che” Kahane, and there’s no way I’m voting for my old man for president
I mean, here you have His Serene Majesty the Emperor Barack Hussein Obama II, Lord of the Flies, Keeper of the Hoops, Master of the Greens, Bringer of Kinetic Military Action, Vacationer-in-Chief, Slayer of Osama, and Protector of the Holy Cities of Honolulu and Chicago, who — despite his impressive array of titles — is probably the most beatable incumbent since George H. W. Bush, and you won’t even try to beat him? Good Gaia, people, where’s the politically correct fighting spirit that negotiated a peace-process settlement with the West? The government program that subsidized the wagon trains? Libby Custer’s grief counselors after the Little Big Horn? Your intrepid forebears would be ashamed of you. Ours, not so much, since they were in therapy at the time.

Like almost none of you, I was riveted by the first-in-the-Fox-nation Republican debate the other day, and thrilled to make the acquaintance of a bunch of guys I’ll probably never lay eyes on again. While personally I’m glad that you wingnuts now officially favor legalizing heroin and sending women who exercise their semi-divine right to choose to Gitmo for enhanced interrogation, I don’t think this is a winning combo, blue-state-wise. If you’re going to beat Li’l Barry, you’re going to need to take off the gloves and bring out the A-team, not the Expendables.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/266866/gop-stupids-step-out-david-kahane?page=1


My oh my, the GOP desperation is fun to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why do they call him 'Vacationer-in-Chief' when he's taken way less than Bushes or Reagan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Because it The National Review. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's weird how the author calls himself a liberal, but
his language is filled with right-wing issues like Bill Ayers, and sums up the left wing's position as 'we don't care about the deficit, we want our entitlements for free and no questions asked and we don't pay taxes, either'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Where does he call himself a liberal? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. In the footer, he jokingly says he votes for liberals and Democrats alike.
Edited on Wed May-11-11 09:05 AM by Marr
If you don't like the word "liberal", swap in the word "Democrat". It's odd how his language is full of right-wing buzzwords and arguments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. His name is a pseudonym. He writes for many right wing
publications including Breitbart.hERE'S HIS BIO FROM pUBLISHERS wEEKLY:

Publishers Weekly
The pseudonymous columnist for the National Review Online ("a kind of reverse Stephen Colbert), Kahane showcases his conservative philosophies in all their prescient glory. A time-travelling Ginsbergian introduction makes it clear that this is a battle cry, not a think piece: "I was present when the Sodomites came for Lot's sons and rejected his living daughters... I was there at Belshazzar's Feast, when the moving hand writ large upon the wall: mene, mene tekell upharsin... I was there when Pilate washed his hands of the Christ, when the Czar and his family were murdered, when Oswald's bullet went through the back of Jack Kennedy's head." Kahane's fondness for language often lends his rebuttals of liberal thought a beat poet's madness; the whole enterprise, however, reads more like a rant than coherent thought, making it difficult at times to find the needle of argument in his haystack of propaganda. Those who follow Kahane (the name of the screenwriter in The Player who was murdered behind the Rialto theater) will no doubt be delighted; those you don't will of course steer clear, taking the author's lead in making no attempt whatsoever to find common ground. (Sept.)

More Reviews and Recommendations
Biography

David Kahane is the “Hollywood screenwriter” pseudonym for a conservative writer who spoofs insufferable liberals regularly in his column for National Review Online, including his Internet sensatio “I Still Hate You, Sarah Palin.” In real life, he is a New York Times bestselling novelist, a screenwriter, and a former journalist and arts critic spoiling to lead the right side over the top.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. So he's actually a right-winger. Got it.
Edited on Wed May-11-11 09:12 AM by Marr
As I said, his language didn't quite jibe with what I assumed to be his position. I also wondered why the National Review would publish a liberal commentator. Now it makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. john mccain..................!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. "is probably the most beatable incumbent since George H. W. Bush"
Is he serious? I liked this article then read that. Such delusion so early in the game....LOL...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
9. this really sums up the republican party...
best bet for the rethugs is to wait to 2016. by then all the crazies will be neutered or dead. it will give the rethugs more time to actually find a decent candidate that will run against the democrat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. "then all the crazies will be neutered or dead"
My bet is on "even crazier". Democratic administrations tend to do that to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC