|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Robb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 12:15 PM Original message |
The £12m question: how WikiLeaks gags its own staff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guruoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
1. Story smells like a RW hit piece. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 12:40 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Now That WSJ Has Their Own Wiki-Style Leaks Site, We'll See A Lot Of That |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 12:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. In the New Statesman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guruoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 01:12 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Author descrediting wikileaks for penalizing those that release info before it's properly vetted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 01:15 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. "...All newsworthy information relating to the workings of WikiLeaks" is subject as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 01:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Karl Rove style hit piece. He's apparently very involved in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 01:38 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. It's written by a well-known liberal blogging lawyer, Jack of Kent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 02:00 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. First, any organization that is operating as Wikileaks is, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 02:27 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. It explicitly says it's to protect its revenue, not to protect sources |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 02:59 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. No, it doesn't say that. That is the interpretation of this blogger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 04:26 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. No, it's the obvious message of the document |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 04:40 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Of course he signed it. That does not mean he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 04:56 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Saying 'he got someone else to write it for him' is not much of an excuse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 05:02 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Editors and publishers of News Organizations do not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
5. Kill the messenger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelvin Mace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 01:35 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Amen, brother |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 02:00 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Oh, sorry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelvin Mace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 04:54 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. True |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-12-11 01:08 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. But it doesn't change the information. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelvin Mace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-12-11 08:26 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. What it changes is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelvin Mace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-12-11 08:29 AM Response to Reply #14 |
28. The ambiguity in your post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MattBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-12-11 08:24 AM Response to Reply #9 |
26. Congratulations: That was the intent of this piece |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelvin Mace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
8. I am still waiting on the bank documents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
10. Correct me if I'm wrong, but DU's moderators sign a non-disclosure form don't they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 01:49 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. It doesn't claim it's because the information is worth £12 million, though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 01:58 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Of course not, but a contract is a contract, and breaching them has consequences. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-12-11 08:20 AM Response to Reply #13 |
25. BINGO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-12-11 08:06 AM Response to Original message |
24. The penalty portion of this contract would be unenforceable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-12-11 08:38 AM Response to Original message |
29. K&R... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 09th 2024, 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC