Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gov’t Official: It is a fact that nuclear fuel melted a hole through Reactor No. 1

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 08:55 AM
Original message
Gov’t Official: It is a fact that nuclear fuel melted a hole through Reactor No. 1
Tokyo Electric Power Company is being forced to review its strategy for stabilizing the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant after announcing that one of its reactors is in a state of “meltdown.” <...>

Economy, Trade and Industry Minister Banri Kaieda said it is a fact that the water injected into the No.1 reactor leaked away because of a hole or holes created by the meltdown.

He said this is the main reason why TEPCO’s plan needs to be reviewed.
***********************************************************************************

Most likely ‘solution’ to fuel melting through reactor is a concrete wall around Unit No. 1 — “Could now take years” to encapsulate because of high radiation

U.S. nuclear experts said that the company may have to build a concrete wall around the unit because of the breach, and that this could now take years.

“If it is assumed the fuel did melt through the reactor, then the most likely solution is to encapsulate the entire unit. This may include constructing a concrete wall around the unit and building a protective cover over it,” W. Gene Corley, senior vice president of CTL Group in Skokie, Illinois, said on Thursday.

“Because of the high radiation that would be present if this has happened, the construction will take many months and may stretch into years,” Corley said.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/12/japan-nuclear-reactor-idUSL3E7GC2JQ20110512
*************************************************************************************

NYT: TEPCO had hoped that Reactor No. 1 was the “easiest to bring under control” as No. 2 and 3 are believed to be breached and leaking...

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/13/world/asia/13japan.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss
*************************************************************************************

The flow of bad news (and radiation) out of Fukushima’s reactors has diminished to a trickle over the past several weeks, as rescue work has proceeded. Not today. TEPCO’s admitted for the first time that Fukushima experienced a grave meltdown. <...>

TEPCO workers and the Japanese government have desperately struggled to keep the nuclear fuel rods inside the reactors cool—if they don’t, the scorching material will melt into a pool of radioactive lava, further damaging the facility. That’s the scenario everyone’s been aiming to avoid—and that’s the scenario we now know had actually occurred all along. Underneath all that dumped seawater has been lying a blob of melted fuel. And it could be melting its way out.

This admittance goes against every assurance TEPCO has handed the world in the midst of Japan’s nuclear crisis <...>

http://enenews.com/its-official-fukushima-was-hit-with-a-full-blown-nuclear-meltdown
**************************************************************************************

I am having a hard time keeping all the reactors straight. Is there only one meltdown or three?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Whatever we do lets not let this stop us from building more reactors, full steam ahead
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. There are seven meltdowns - 3 reactors and 4 spent fuel pools
There isn't a precise technical definition of "meltdown",
so it can be used with different connotations.
"Core damage" is the closest technical term, but isn't very descriptive.
Three Mile Island is called a "partial meltdown" because only some of the fuel melted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. SEVEN...worse than I thought...
It is hard to keep it all straight. I suspect it is so highly technical that some people can't even process it all.

Thanks so much for taking the time to explain. Yikes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC