but if the question is which is generally the worst it would be C? One might conceivably save lives in some situations with A even though often there would be death and destruction from panic as well as encumbrances to life saving measures or even event exploitation. B straddles the middle and could be beneficial in avoiding panic results and allowing at least tougher measures behind the scenes In actuality though B usually suppresses the needed measures as part of the consistent denial. It often has to do with the money motive and accountability avoidance.
C however seals the deal most often with simply defying panic(until people DO lose faith) while definitely suppressing appropriate action, expense and accountability. This hardcore puts the disaster second to the status quo even if the status quo has vanished completely.
The logic is open to dispute and documentation. Sadly we have a lot of the latter to analyze if anyone would like to.
Example?:In climate change the "sky is falling" end of the spectrum seems closest to reality and the most unlikely to move the population to action much less panic. Disappearing islands for example will go down without a ripple on the world scene. The B character on this issue would generally be the Dem party stance on moderate measures moderately "fought" for. C is the GOP and their murderously simple-minded corporate overlords.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.