Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dr. No Should Face Consequences

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 07:08 PM
Original message
Dr. No Should Face Consequences
http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2011/5/13/92251/2975

Dr. No Should Face Consequences

by BooMan
Fri May 13th, 2011 at 09:22:51 AM EST


John Ensign should have resigned in disgrace back when his affair was made public. It isn't that he cheated; it's who he cheated with and what he tried to do to keep it a secret. We didn't need an Ethics investigation to know that Ensign is a dirtbag unworthy of high public office. We will now get a demonstration on whether our system of justice is capable of treating the powerful with the same harshness it metes out to ordinary citizens. Fmr. Sen. John Ensign must be prosecuted. A jury can decide his guilt and his punishment (if any), but he must face a jury.

As for Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK), it appears that he has lied about his role both in the press and to the Senate Ethics Committee investigators. I remember way back when this all started to leak out that Sen. Coburn tried to invoke doctor/patient confidentiality to keep his conversations with Ensign secret. Tom Coburn is a gynecologist. Not to be crude, but John Ensign doesn't have a vagina, uterus, ovaries, or fallopian tubes. I knew right then that Coburn had committed some kind of major ethical lapse.

To be fair, Coburn tried to be a good friend by making a strong effort to get Ensign to stop pursuing his staffer and close friend's wife. Coburn tried to help the cuckolded husband, too, as was only fair under the circumstances. There was probably an element of basic decency and friendship that motivated Coburn's actions. I recognize that. But, that doesn't change the fact that he actively negotiated a hush-money package for Doug and Cynthia Hampton and then lied about it to investigators. He should be facing potential perjury changes, and possibly obstruction of justice charges, too. But, even if prosecutors want to cut him some slack, the good people of Oklahoma should be disgusted and hold Coburn accountable the next time he faces reelection. Of course, that won't be until 2016, and Oklahoma is so conservative that they won't lightly consider a Democratic alternative. It's probable that Coburn will never face any consequences for his ethical lapses.

The citizens of this fair country are getting used to that kind of outcome. Petty drug-dealers face decades in prison. Corrupt senators get reelected. Wall Street banksters get a pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. They are making a big assumption that ensign does not have
a uterus.

I would suggest that he be required to drop his pants on the Senate floor to show
the world that he does or does not have a penis.
The world has a right to know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChoppinBroccoli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. That Was My First Reaction To That Line Of The Story As Well--PROVE IT!!!
Why won't John Ensign PROVE he's a man? I DEMAND that he show proof!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. He was reelected in 2010
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Check out the DU GD archives
Some of your comments were prescient.
I'm lovin' it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I cannot stand either of these mofos. I guess it was obvious.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. much as I would love for that to happen, I think the "to be fair" sentence will
probably weigh more heavily with most people. I think most people will look at it as Coburn was put in the middle of a bad situation and his mistake was in lying about trying to work out a financial deal, but they will even be sympathetic about his role in the financial negotiations -- they'll perceive that he was just trying to get the situation resolved and get the parties to move on. They'll perceive him as getting no personal gain from this. They will see this as primarily a personal matter and that he didn't create the mess, so they could understand why he lied to keep it from getting worse, etc., etc.

I am not saying this is right or wrong. I just think that is how most people will react to Coburn's role in this - if they care at all about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC