|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 07:15 PM Original message |
I'm not sure I believe the Bin Laden "porn" story? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. I do not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagAss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
2. Ditto....this one is a reach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
themadstork (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
3. Yeah, obvious propaganda. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
4. It WOULD explain why there was never a second, major attack. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
givemebackmycountry (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 07:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. YOU, are one sick twisted individual. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Serenades (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
5. no surprise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Traveler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
6. I can believe it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 07:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
20. I'm with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Traveler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 08:20 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. Hi, CatWoman! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 08:45 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. Hi T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 09:16 PM Response to Reply #6 |
34. I believe it. I remember during the cold war that they took |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 09:22 PM Response to Reply #6 |
36. How do you explain gay porn? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Traveler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 09:44 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Of course. Off topic a bit, but yes, it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 09:52 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. I think 'objectification' is a meaningless, bs term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Traveler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 10:32 PM Response to Reply #39 |
45. I disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 12:03 AM Response to Reply #45 |
51. "well understood cognitive process." according to whom? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamaforthewin (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 10:34 PM Response to Reply #6 |
46. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 01:57 AM Response to Reply #6 |
57. you have no knowledge of bin laden you didn't get via media, just like anybody else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
F Bastiat (89 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 08:12 AM Response to Reply #6 |
61. It's really not that all that complicated... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
7. Lol, if it's in the US media, it would be insane not to question it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bicoastal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
8. Why is it so hard to believe, though? I mean, your thinking eliminates one possible outcome... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robertpaulsen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
10. It took US military men 13 days to find a stash of porn? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 11:40 PM Response to Reply #10 |
50. They found it immediately. You can see some of it in one of the photos they released. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 02:34 PM Response to Reply #50 |
72. I saw the photos and there was nothing distiguishable as porn... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaurenG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
11. It seems plausible to me. He couldn't easily leave his house |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
12. I don't care about the Bin Laden porn story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 07:33 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. I'd rather see his porn than see a picture of him dead. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 08:03 PM Response to Reply #13 |
22. I have no need to see either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 11:37 PM Response to Reply #22 |
49. Do you know how hard it is to find porn on the internet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrScorpio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
14. Only don't ask about the liquor and hookers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Curmudgeoness (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
15. Yeah, wouldn't you just love to see those pictures! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 07:41 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Drats! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IcyPeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 07:43 PM Response to Original message |
17. call me skeptical too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinboy3niner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
18. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
19. I can believe it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
21. No. I think more disinformation. But I believe little these days. I wait and see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hulka38 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
23. It's so lame. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TK421 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
24. I don't think the guy was capable of having an erection n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
25. Kama Sutra ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LetTimmySmoke (970 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
26. Everyone watches porn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Midway Rebel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
28. Hmm. Let's see... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benld74 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
29. I always thought they took turns in the barrel,,,,, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
30. It would serve a useful purpose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arctic Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
31. So he had porn. Did he have liquor and hookers too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frank Cannon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 08:07 AM Response to Reply #31 |
60. He had fried pork rinds in a bowl next to his Playstation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arctic Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 11:22 AM Response to Reply #60 |
62. No wonder all the kids want to join Al Qaeda. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLPanhandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
33. What do you think the odds are that an oppressive fundamentalist watches porn? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
35. 95% of men look at porn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carni (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
37. The Uncle Rico of terrorism... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
40. Everyone's bullshit meter should be firmly in the red zone on this one, I think. For starters, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HipChick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 10:04 PM Response to Original message |
41. 99.1% of men look at porn... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
42. I do believe it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Narkos (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
43. Whatever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 10:22 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. That's deep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Samantha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
47. I have not believed it from the start |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
48. I believe it. He's just like all the other "family values" types w/their pants around their ankles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 12:04 AM Response to Original message |
52. Yeah, an adult male with a digital porn stash is a huge fucking stretch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 12:24 AM Response to Reply #52 |
53. No shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
54. Believe it , Kentuck...LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 01:28 AM Response to Original message |
55. k*r You're saying what I thought when I heard it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pauldp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 01:54 AM Response to Original message |
56. It was the ISI's porn stash. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 04:39 AM Response to Original message |
58. I think anyone who's not skeptical is a jingoistic fool. When the history books come out with the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 06:12 AM Response to Original message |
59. I thought exactly the same thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
63. IMHO.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roadie70 (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
64. Why couldn't they just shoot the guy and shut the fuck up about it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sibelian (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 12:08 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. They're trying to manipulate narratives. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
66. I haven't believed the official US story for ANYTHING.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stevenmarc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
67. He must have been doing something with his time, he certainly wasn't fixing the place up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zax2me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
68. Why would the Obama admin lie? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 02:05 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. Of course not! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swede (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
70. Of course you don't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 02:28 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. Why should I? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wednesdays (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
73. Okay. This is important...why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 02:42 PM Response to Reply #73 |
74. Pornography is not important... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intheflow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 07:01 PM Response to Reply #74 |
75. That they chose to release this info is telling in itself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zax2me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
76. I can't think of anything easier to believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
77. He (and the hijackers) collected porn because they were not islamic fundamentalists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 12th 2024, 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC