Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I just got back from a business trip and had to go through Security 3 times and I want to say

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 10:47 PM
Original message
I just got back from a business trip and had to go through Security 3 times and I want to say
that the TSA employees were courteous, alert and professional. The new guy at La Guardia was concerned because the boarding pass I had been given at the first leg of the trip was printed on a US Airways form and I was at the Delta terminal. He didn't think I was a threat, just wanted to make sure I wasn't lost. His supervisor was right there to explain things. (Also - way to perpetuate the stereotype of the uncaring New Yorker!).

So, I am certain we'll here now about how TSA is all Kabuki theater, and there will be horror stories. I jsut wanted to add some balance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. I travel frequently and have had the same experience as...
you. I have been singled out for the full body scanner, as well as the enhanced patdown, and have not experienced anything remotely like what many here are alleging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. They were scanning everyone at Spokane this morning. Did I mention the
guard at Philadelphia who pointed me in the right direction when I changed planes?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. TSA agents are down right nice unlike
guards at the Daley center here in Chicago. Granted the guards at the Daley center deal with people who are angry because they have to go to court or jury duty every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Philly? What finger did he use to point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. k&r, glad your TSA experiences were ok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CelticThunder Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. How nice that they are polite while they are treating you like a criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Going through a security checkpoint is not....
being treated like a criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supply Side Jesus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. That is not being treated like a criminal
if so, I'd want to be arrested there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Hmmm.... are you saying that overweight white women of a certain
age can't be terrorists? Isn't that reverse profiling?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Fascist societies are unbearably polite societies.
Check it out. Rules rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
75. Give me a break. I would rather face a patdown than have to fight for my life at 35,000 feet. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueamy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #75
120. How often have you had to fight for your life
at 35000 feet?

Just asking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #75
124.  How does your being subjected to a
patdown by some TSA flunkie make you safer? You aren't a terrorist. And it's a pretty safe bet that someone out to create havoc on a plane is going to be smart enough to figure out how to get past TSA in the first place.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #124
125. Two questions...
How would the TSA know the poster was a terrorist? Because the poster told them? Secondly, with 2M people flying daily, if anyone determined to create havoc can just get part the TSA, why aren't there lots more of these incidents?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
116. +1000% -- exactly!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. You mean you didn't get raped over and over by horrible monsters just out of prison?
I'm shocked!:sarcasm: Sorry for the really really dark sarcasm but it seems like thats what some people here believe thats all TSA agents do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I know...
it's really ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
U4ikLefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. No, genuflecting to authority is what is really ridiculous.
dud
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #15
78. Living in a society requires that we not do whatever we want to do.
Obeying laws is not genuflecting. Now, come up with some other absurd claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
U4ikLefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #78
105. We decried the security-state of the Soviets, but here we are.
And you seem to be loving it.

I guess we are in decline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #105
108. LOL!
Airport security makes us the Soviet Union?

LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #108
117. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #117
118. "Creeping authoritatarion (sic) mindset"
When you can't win the debate on the merits, just accuse your opponent of some variation of authoritarianism.

Too funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:44 AM
Original message
why SDuderstadt, mad cap. where you going with that suitcase and boarding pass?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
88. Tombstone, AZ...
Now...are you going to do something or just stand there and bleed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #88
91. Tombstone? very cosmipolitan. i will not be pawed at, thank you very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #91
92. Why, dionysus!
Are we cross?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. You mean the horrible monster who came over to the bench to pick up
the bin so I wouldn't have to haul it back to the counter?


I'm not totally wishy-washy - it used to really drive me around the bend when I had to sign in at the door, sign in at the office, sign out at the office and then sign out at the door when I picked up one of the kids at school for a regular doctor's appointment and not once did anyone ask for ID! But I understand that airplanes are an attractive target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. Millions of people own guns too - and only a very few use them to shoot others
but no one reports on the guy/gal who had a gun today and did not use it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. at least not on DU. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. My experience has been the same as yours
on my many flights.

I'm sorry if others have had a bad experience, but I have not seen any bad behavior, only courtesy, on my flights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riftaxe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. It is entireably possible to appreciate the hard job the
TSA employees do and still be against full body scanners...if i wanted nude images of me on the internet, i would start a web site :)

Of course if i started such a website, i would fully expect a visit from homeland security...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. I've also been impressed with the TSA employees I've dealth with...I appreciate security
and am willing to tolerate small discomforts to get there alive. Apparently not everyone feels the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #19
82. During the early days of the TSA, when they were taking massive heat
for being lazy and unprofessional, I left a valuable personal item at an airport screening. I found out later that the item was turned in to a supervisor and was taken to lost and found. When I figured out where I may have left it and called, I was asked to give a description of the item, which I did. The agent that talked to me then got the address to mail the item to and mailed it back to me, safely packed and insured. And I did not pay a cent for my own screwup. My experience before the event described and since has been nothing but positive with TSA agents and their conduct while doing their jobs. I don't understand where the complaints are coming from, but given the attitude displayed by some on DU that their small piece of the world is so precious, I have an idea of why the complaints exist to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
21. You didn't mention what type of security. Scanner, or pat down. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #21
34. because those are not a problem for her, and she accepts the invasions she can say
there was no problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
96. Scanner . I thought about requesting a pat down just out of residual
fear of radiation exposure, but then figured, screw it - I've had so much exposure in my lifetime, accidental and medical that it wouldn't make any difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
22. Same experience here, in a recent international trip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
23. The walmart greeters of fascism.
Welcome to fascism, torture on aisle 5. Unwarranted spying on all aisles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #23
132. Comparing TSA employees to Walmart Greeters is
an insult to Walmart greeters.

Hard to believe the apologists here who are so scared of phantom boogeymen that they would gladly bend over to the government, surrendering both freedom and dignity in order to have the illusion of safety.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PotatoChip Donating Member (481 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
24. And nobody touched your junk?
or did you pull a hedgehog on them? ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
25. Thank you for your inspirational story. Why have you missed the point?
Edited on Sat May-14-11 06:28 AM by Pholus
It's nice the TSA is working to improve their PR image. They have to -- their revenue stream comes from it. And absolutely no doubt most TSA employees are really great people.
Even the most monsterous organizations in history were full of charming or sympathetic individuals and the TSA is FAR from that category.

However, they are also FAR from harmless to our ideals and your testimonial doesn't delve into THAT too deeply.

For some reason you have bottom lined this, oversimplifying concerns about policy and administration into some kind of simpleminded hatred of the TSA rank and file.

Why?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #25
104. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueamy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #25
121. +2
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #25
122. Excellent post. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
26. I'm certain most TSA employees are nice enough people
Thanks for the anecdote.

The issue is the very existence of TSA, not the workers who carry out its policy as best as they're able.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #26
32. You could always design a better...
airport security system, dude.

Can't wait to see your design.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. The point WAS that better ones were available yet were ignored.
Four years to RAM through what should have been designed in from the start:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/01/AR2011020105305.html

Wow, the privacy concerns GO AWAY because it is no worse than a metal detector.

Can't wait to see your justification for TSA ineptitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. "Can't wait to see your justification for TSA ineptitude"
You don't appear to want principled debate. Go fight by yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. Ohhhh, so "Can't wait to see your design" wasn't? What high principles you have!
Edited on Sat May-14-11 09:49 AM by Pholus
I will have to fight by myself.

Edit. Removed a jab. I figure my responder CAN'T defend the TSA. This was a boondoggle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. You don't see the difference between...
"can't wait to see your design" and "can't wait to see your justification for TSA ineptitude"?

Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. Actually, both are snarky comments. Only one of us got indignant though.

So yes, "really."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. How does "can't wait to see your design"...
poison the debate?

Can you see how "can't wait to see your justification for TSA ineptitude" does?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. On the off chance you're being serious here, I will be too.

Your original comment went along
the lines of "If you can do better,
do it." with the "Can't wait to see
your design" a seeming indicator that
you are not expecting a result. Now
perhaps you were sincere, but the use
of the word "dude" at least by me
is an indicator that the intent of
the comment may be a bit demeaning.
YMMV of course.

My point was that most of the privacy
problems with the system were easily
rectified, the exact solution being
proposed by an engineer four years ago.
The TSA ignored his suggestions, though
they were more than reasonable and he
had a relatively credible background.

The flap that so many DU'ers think was
some right wing conspiracy last November
got this engineer some press time and
as a result the TSA felt some pressure
to consider his changes (which as admitted
by all were pretty painless) which led to the
story I linked to.

Now the radiation issues are something
else entirely, yet the TSA doesn't want
their people wearing radiation badges
for some reason. Even though my work
deals with much lower dosages, we have
radiation safety people AND we wear
badges.

Why should I trust a safety organization
that does not care for the safety of their
workers?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #42
47. "yet the TSA does not want their people wearing radiation badges for some reason"
So, you don't know the TSA's reasoning, but you already know they "don't care for the safety of their workers"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. You REALLY don't want to discuss that WP story, do you?

I am saying that there is a history of unresponsiveness and secrecy in an area where openness is a plus, so no, I do not "trust" this organization. They have to earn that trust. Sucks to be them I suppose.

Actually the February story shows that when faced with sufficient pressure they will eventually do the right thing. In that way, they're not irredeemable and that's a start.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #48
50. "secrecy in an area where openness is a plus"
Edited on Sat May-14-11 10:23 AM by SDuderstadt
Really? On the spectrum between secrecy and openness, you can't see why the TSA wouldn't tilt more to the secrecy side?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #50
52. In general, the best security systems do not depend on secrets so openness implies good design.

Again, YMMV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #52
53. Please prove that n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #53
54. Why don't you prove the opposite. You can't and here is the example.

You can fly while being on the "no fly list"

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/17/business/yourmoney/17digi.html

Bonus points if you notice how secrecy surrounding a poorly designed system didn't enhance passenger safety, but it did cover quite nicely the people responsible for the screwup as they tried to PUNISH the person pointing out the security hole.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #54
60. It's YOUR claim, dude...
I don't have to prove the opposite. The maker of the claim bears the burden of proof. Look up the logical fallacy known as "trying to shift the burden of proof".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #60
61. You can't prove the opposite. You're good at weaving. So what about the article.
Why did it take four years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #61
64. I don't HAVE to prove the opposite...
YOU'RE the one who made the claim. Duh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #64
66. So define your standard of "proof" before I start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #66
68. Nevermind...
dude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #68
70. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #70
74. Apparently the word "nevermind"...
confuses you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #74
76. Yes. Much like the article apparently confuses you. Look, I'm just wasting time between laundry

loads. I am finding this an amusing debate and not much more. I'm hoping you're not taking it much more seriously than that either.

Dude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #53
55. Example 2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #53
57. Define proof.
Do I need to write a dissertation, or merely cite authorities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #57
67. Nevermind n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #50
58. Furthermore, you STILL didn't discuss the article. :) This is getting fun!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #47
56. I know I WEAR a badge because the govt regulations say it's for my safety. Why then not TSA? nt
Edited on Sat May-14-11 10:53 AM by Pholus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #56
62. Since you don't identify WHERE you work...
the relevance of your statement remains to be determined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #62
63. Bummer for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #63
69. And for any reader...
nevermind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #69
77. My actual identity? Less important than the OSHA regs I reference.

At least as a standard of proof. After all, your next post would be asking me to mail you my birth certificate or something.

Dude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #77
79. Show me where I asked your identity...
dude.

I asked you where you worked. A generic answer would have been fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #79
81. Where I work is less important than the OSHA regs themselves. Unless you're TSA of course.
Edited on Sat May-14-11 11:31 AM by Pholus
Then you get to ignore them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #81
93. Last worditis?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #93
94. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #94
97. last worditis. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #62
65. But let me toss you a bone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #36
72. All that wasted thread because you didn't want to answer one question. Amusing. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
27. Coming thru customs on my way back to the U.S. at JFK last month,
I had a different experience. The guy asked me about what "food" I listed as bringing back from France. I started to show him a little box of macaroons I had bought in Paris and he barked "I don't want to see them, just tell me what they are!" He was NOT smiling. And this was before OBL was killed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. The screening leaving Mexico was much more thorough.
First of all, I generally agree that, as people, they're mostly quite courteous and helpful, even when I've been pulled aside for the "random" secondary screening. However, on a recent trip to Cancun I was really surprised at their version of the TSA; nearly every person had their carry-on bags manually searched. Me too, and my wife. In my case, the questioned me about my box of chargers and cables for the various cameras and electronics we were carrying. A woman in front of me had all her knitting stuff taken away (except the yarn). In the states, even when I've been pulled aside, it always seems to be for a "mistake." Like, one guy thought the eyelets on my snowboard boots were suspicious. Huh? At least being suspicious of a box of wires makes sense. What did this guy think I was going to do with snowboard boots? As nice as they may be, they tend to lack common sense in that regard.

The question about our freedoms (or lack thereof) is valid, but a different discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #29
51. maybe a snowboard boot bomb?
Yukkety yuk...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #29
100. Who was doing the screening - Mexican security or TSA?
When I was leaving Brazil, we all went through security, then got pulled aside again halfway down the jetway and had all our carry-ons hand searched.

If TSA is so screwed up, why do so many other countries follow pretty much the same procedures?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #27
83. The agent was right and you were wrong. Any international traveler
know that hangups are going to happen when food, wooden and ceramic items are brought in on international flights. You are lucky the agent did not take the food item to customs, you would have gotten it back it weeks later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #83
90. Oh, the agent was right but wasn't interested in searching it, just in knowing what it was.
I travel to Europe every year and simply forgot to put that item (bought it last minute at CDG but not in the duty free shop) in my checked bag. So even an experienced international traveler can make a goof.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #27
99. Actually - he had a point. It's like being at a traffic stop - you
don't make a move unless the cop tells you to. If he pulls you over and sees you reaching into the glove box, he has no idea if you're being helpful and grabbing your registration and license or reaching for a gun. In this case - you could have been reaching in to pullout a packet of powder or whatever.

It's natural for innocent people to try to be helpful and provide information. It's hard for us to understand that our actions could be misconstrued.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #99
112. I was negligent in not packing the little box of macaroons in my checked bag.
It was in a lovely bag (from Laduree, a Paris tea room!)that I got at the store's CDG airport store cart. I should have known better, since I go to Europe every year. I think he knew it was just an oversight and not a big deal. Actually, I'm glad he was so gruff. I would rather have him be that way!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
28. I fly almost every week of the year for business
I probably go through security over 150 times each year.

I've never had an issue with TSA. Of course, I know what I'm doing and don't sit and argue about removing my shoes for 5 minutes like some passengers.

I don't think the nude-o-scopes are worthwhile but I've been through them. I understand they can't be seen profiling which to me is stupid if you really want to make flying more secure, but that's not their fault.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
30. That pretty much describes by last 10 flights.
In fact, I do not remember a flight where TSA workers were anything but professional. At MSP, they even smile a lot, and are especially helpful to older travelers and families..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
31. The problem with American has NEVER been how we treat business men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #31
86. Oh oh. The class warfare bomb. Anyone making more than $80,000 per
year better duck now. Even if you are middle class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #31
101. I travel on business, but I travel in blue jeans and a polo shirt,
sneakers or steel toe shoes. I am an overweight white woman of a certain age from a small town. My picture is in the dictionary under "person with no authority whatsoever".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
33. well see, as i read first subthread, you ACCEPT the porn scans and groping. some peole feel it is
an infringement on our rights. so for you accepting these intrusive actions you feel not violation or unrest. the person that feels these are intrusions and wrong will feel a wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #33
46. Our democratic president could stop it today if he wanted to.
The workers are not at fault for doing what they are told to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #46
49. they are in that there are those that walk it with less than integrity which is what happens to some
allowed a power and control over people and embracing it. absolutely. you have some that understand their responsiblity in the position, and those that abuse it because it makes them feel better about themselves.

but i also know it is in the position of policy that is the real issue. which enables the individual worker to be in that position.

i know obama could do something. and i am disappointed that he has chosens bush's path
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
40. My personal experience is that is depends on the airport or the people working at the moment you go
thru security.

I travel with someone in a wheelchair.
Departing Phoenix was a nitemare. Departing Chicago O'Hare was a breeze.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #40
45. Right, it is very airport dependent
San Diego always used to see my umbrella as a security threat -- no one else did. A corkscrew that had gone through three previous screenings unscathed became a weapon of mass destruction in Chicago. ("He's got a blade!!! He's got a blade!!!) A very nice man in Key West showed me how to get my metal belt buckle through without taking my belt off. (Turn it sideways) A guy in Hartford at 5 a.m. on a snowy morning informed me that the plastic bag with my liquids was 1/2-inch too big and I would have to get a smaller bag to get through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #40
102. Wild ass guess here - there are a lot of people in wheel chairs
Edited on Sat May-14-11 02:45 PM by hedgehog
departing from Phoenix. If you were a terrorist trying to smuggle something on board using a wheel chair, you go where the wheel chairs are. It makes sense Phoenix would be more scrupulous.

On the other hand, maybe people in Chicago are just more helpful than people in Phoenix!
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
43. As an *in*frequent consumer, I say it's not the intrusion but rather the abuse of power
* In Boston, it was unnerving in the empty sky bridge to see 4 maximally armed dudes approaching. Just their complaisant smiles at my small startlement were unsettling.

* As I say, I'm an INfrequent, so much has to do with my not knowing what to expect or do. So the dude at a gate snarled at me to do something and I didn't understand what. The passenger in front of me turned and said my windbreaker needed to come off. O.K.

* So I had the week's subway pass in my shirt pocket and another guard flipped out about my emptying the pocket and was deflated to see it was a subway pass. At least he caught something.

* In line I watched the dude doing pat downs being particular about who he patted more extensively. It appeared to be dudes in their 20s in good shape. The kid in front of me thought the pat down was over and started to walk but the guard said, "Wait a minute, let me get your back..." And proceeded to smooth his hands over the dude's back. REALLY, it wasn't that *I* wanted the same massage, but as I prepared to lift my arms and such, the dude just waved me past. I felt short and fat for some reason...

* Went through a scanner. The female guard looked conscientious and overworked and didn't tell me where to go. There was a door with a glass box, so I went in there. I thought that was the passage out and went to the other end and reached for the other door. A supervisor LEAPT to berate the guard, telling her that I was trying to leave the box without permission. She said, "He went in there on his own. *I* didn't tell him to go in there." So, they let me out the entrance door and told me to go around the box.


I realize these comments show my own lack of savoir faire. It's Saturday morning. But there's a nugget of validity to the "abuse" I'm alleging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
44. These people are low-wage workers earning a living. We shouldn't blame them
for policies we don't like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #44
128. What's wrong with TSA is in your post: "Low-wage workers"
The government entrusts the security of airline passengers to poorly trained, unqualified people who aren't paid much.

I suspect those interested in causing trouble aboard an aircraft are somewhat more savvy than those feeling up babies at airports because someone told them to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
59. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
71. You were in one of the states that is planning on banning
the Rapiscans and patdowns. Both NY and NJ are opposed to the Constitutional abuses of these policies.

So, it's not surprising you would not have been molested as so many others have. Thank the legislature there for their outspoken opposition to the destruction of our rights. And for your better experience as a traveler as a result. At least eight states now are moving to ban the TSA abusive patdowns. See here, Texas just did http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=1100077&mesg_id=1100077
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
73. I never have problems with airport screening when I travel. I was picked
twice during my many travels for the wand check. The agent did his job and I moved on. Nothing that was done was offensive and the agents were professional. If people don't want pat-downs, maybe they should listen the fuck up when agents are telling them what they must remove before walking through detectors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
80. I'd expect the travesties to be a small percentage. But, as with teachers and under-age sex stories,
or police and brutality stories, we publicize the miscreant behavior to KEEP it in the small percentage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueamy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
84. The TSA employees are morons.
I was singled out cause I had a one way ticket to Vegas...cause my guy travels for a living and was in Vegas and we were driving back together.

Anyway, they pulled me outta line and double searched me. The couple behind me had to open their luggage, which was full of grass clippings or marijuana or SOMETHING....the TSA looked at their luggage and sent them thru. Me, they pulled everything outta my carry on, searched it all, touched it all and then sent me thru.

WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #84
87. You had a one way ticket. What do you expect them to do?
They did the right thing. You used the term "moron" in your post and likely used some other terms when the TSA agents were trying to get you to cooperate. A lesson for next time. If you have something going on that stand out and cause you to get flagged, try calmly explaining your situation instead of feeling set upon. Most likely, all you would have had to do was produce a drivers license with the address that you were driving back to. The couple with the green stuff in their luggage likely go through because they were cooperative when asked questions that needed to be asked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #87
89. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #84
126. It's pathetic that the US entrusts airport security to
a bunch of idiots whose only other job option is asking "Do you want to supersize that?" It's even more pathetic that some of the American public believes these morons are capable of keeping them safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #84
127. Governor Kasich...
is that you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
85. Our last trip to LaGuardia hubby was felt up 3 times--wanted to comment he was Major, USAF, retired
and was the TSA guy getting a boner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueamy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #85
119. Amen.
You took the words rightouttamymouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marblehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
95. Ben Franklin said
" Those willing to give up liberty for security deserve neither and will lose both "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #95
98. They didn't have terrorists trying to...
blow-up airplanes in Franklin's day either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #98
106. Police State security is awesome, Chomsky is a moron...
:wtf: DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #106
107. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Zax2me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #98
115. Someone didn't tell good ole Ben about Islamic terrorists
Who want to blow up as many Americans as possible.
I think he might have a different opinion today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gravel Democrat Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #98
123. The Revolutionary war was a walk in the park
that little thing in 1812 was a fire drill too



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #98
129. Or twinkies...
Or twinkies... :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #95
111. Does that mean no security checks for air travel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
103. no surprise there
I've had plenty of interactions with TSA personnel who have their act together. But anecdotes in no way invalidate the opposition to TSA tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philippine expat Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
109. I travel frequently
and for the most part have found TSA employees to be OK. Just like everything
and everywhere else they have their 10%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
110. Last TSA badge-wearer I had the misfortune of coming into
contact with was a mean, nasty individual with a giant chip on her shoulder who inexplicably emptied the entire contents of my wallet into a plastic tray and dropped it to the ground.

Happy for you that you had better luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #110
113. Omigod! Really?
Have you contacted Amnesty International yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
114. The last time I went through security (at SFO), one of the TSA agents was drawing a map
of the terminal and writing out instructions for a passenger in line who was apparently deaf and a bit nervous about the process. I've noticed that the people at some airports seem consistently pleasant and others less so - it really seems that there is a local leadership variability that plays a big role. The map-drawing officer told me that (although it looks the same) some airports are TSA and others are private companies, which could be part of it... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
130. I've begun using the train and buses more often.
I've begun using the train and buses a lot more often in the past ten years. Less headaches for me all the way around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
131. i flew last thanksgiving when all folks were up in the air....
Edited on Mon May-16-11 10:41 AM by spanone
and i experienced the same as you......

friendly, kind and courteous
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC