Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Media Ignores Energy Breakthrough: Worry-Free Nuclear Power

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 07:21 AM
Original message
Media Ignores Energy Breakthrough: Worry-Free Nuclear Power
This "cold fusion" reaction is far less dangerous than the nuclear fission that occurs at existing nuclear plants. If a catastrophe occurs and the reactor chamber breaks and spills its contents, the device would turn off immediately and the reaction would simply cease. Since there are no radioactive materials or radioactive waste, nothing bad would be introduced into the environment and no danger would be posed to humans or the environment by the device's failure.

Another important point is that these units have the potential to decentralize power generation. In other words, instead of tens of thousands of people relying on a single electrical power plant linked by miles of transmission lines, each individual household could potentially be powered by a relatively small E-Cat device which could fit in a space the size of a closet.



Ross-Focardi Energy Catalyzer
At the heart of the reaction is the catalyst (or catalysts), which are key to the whole process. Right now, the catalysts are intellectual property and are being kept secret, at least until a Rossi can obtain a full patent on the system. Only Rossi and a few of his close business partners know the identity of the proprietary catalyst(s).

On January 14, 2011, Rossi and his colleague Sergio Focardi demonstrated a small working version of the Energy Catalyzer at the University of Bologna, Italy, that produced more than 10 kW of heat power for an hour, while only consuming a fraction of that amount of energy to run. The device takes about 400 watts/hour to run, but produces 15,000 watts/hour of energy. In other words, it takes the equivalent energy of about four 100-watt light bulbs to produce 150 100-watt bulbs' worth of power –- 37.5 times more output than input –- a fantastic rate of return. The inventors calculate that one gram of nickel in the E-Cat can produce the equivalent energy of 517 kilograms, or about 1,140 pounds of oil. A gallon of oil weighs roughly 6-8 pounds depending on its density, so one gram of nickel in the table-top sized E-Cat can produce about the amount of energy generated by about 142 gallons of oil.http://www.prwatch.org/news/2011/04/10661/media-ignores-energy-breakthrough-worry-free-nuclear-power
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is a press release, not a news story. And it's "secret."
Sounds awesome if it's real, but lots of red flags. Looks more like a document to help drum up investors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Red flags?
I think so too.

If we made red flags for the rest of our lives, we could not make enough red flags.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. The fact that it's a press release, for starters.
Edited on Sat May-14-11 07:49 AM by Atman
The secrecy, the hoping they get a patent (why wouldn't they already have the patents in place before announcing this. Lots of stuff. These guys are looking for some PR, hoping to interest investors. If this was viable, it would be huge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. They Post and answered questions in 'The Journal of Nuclear Physics'
From the site:

All the articles published on the Journal Of Nuclear Physics are Peer Reviewed. The Peer Review of every paper is made by at least one University Physics Professor.







Link here:

http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=360


I look forward to hearing more about this.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Um, no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. google is your friend here.
The so-called Journal of Nuclear Physics is a blog 'published' by Rossi, who is also by no coincidence the snake-oil salesman pushing this bullshit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Um, no.
EOM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. You sure John Galt isn't behind this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. media ignores, for once, utter bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC