Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. to limit Afghan forces' growth

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 07:34 AM
Original message
U.S. to limit Afghan forces' growth
U.S. to limit Afghan forces' growth
By David S. Cloud
Los Angeles Times
Posted: 05/12/2011 08:53:57 PM PDT
Updated: 05/12/2011 10:43:57 PM PDT

WASHINGTON -- After months of internal deliberations, the Obama administration has decided to limit the expansion of Afghanistan's army and police forces over the next 18 months, largely to hold down the costs of training, equipping and paying them.

The White House decision, which has not been announced, also appears to signal that President Barack Obama may approve only a modest reduction of U.S. troops in Afghanistan this summer, U.S. officials said Thursday.

With fewer Afghan troops to bolster security, Army Gen. David Petraeus, commander of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, is expected to argue against a major drawdown of the nearly 100,000 U.S. troops deployed in the country, several military officials said.

They said Petraeus and other senior officers in the Pentagon favor limiting the scale and slowing the pace of any U.S. pullout in order to preserve fragile security gains, especially in the south and east, where the Taliban presence remains strong.

Petraeus and senior Pentagon officials had pushed to add as many as 73,000 troops to the Afghan force, officials said. Instead, the administration has limited the addition to 47,000, which would bring the authorized Afghan force to 352,000. The U.S. government provides most of the money to recruit, train and pay the troops.



unhappycamper comment: Anything to to keep this occupation going on. And on. And on. And ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. afghanistan is a clusterfuck. it's never gonna get any better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. I am confused by the numbers.
Might just be my pre-coffee brain.

The above says "the nearly 100,000 U.S. troops deployed in the country"
then says
adding 47,00 "would bring the authorized Afghan force to 352,000."

So we have "nearly" 100,000 troops there
we add 47,000
and that creates an "authorized" force of 352,000?????

I am not missing the key part of the story, which is the US is showing signs of being unable to continue wars of imperialism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. authorized Afghan force = afghan troops
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. They are talking about the 352,000 Afghan troops We The People pay.
The way out usta be 'Once the Afghan Security forces are in place and trained, we can start withdrawing US forces.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. We're doing more for their economy than our own...
I blame Congress for this as much as anyone else.

We could be free of these conflicts in just under a year...as long as armament cash flows through congressional districts, there will be a delay in extracting our troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 05:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC