Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens: Snuffing Osama von Douchebag's ass was LEGAL. USA!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 02:38 PM
Original message
Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens: Snuffing Osama von Douchebag's ass was LEGAL. USA!
Justice Stevens says bin Laden killing legally justified
By Bill Mears, CNN Supreme Court Producer
May 13, 2011 6:14 p.m. EDT

http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/05/13/scotus.stevens.bin.laden/index.html?hpt=T2



Washington (CNN) -- Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens has voiced support for the killing of al Qaeda terrorist leader Osama bin Laden by U.S. forces, saying it was legally justified.

In remarks Thursday evening at his alma mater, Northwestern University, the 91-year-old former justice said the order by President Barack Obama for the covert mission by U.S. Navy SEALs was "to remove an enemy who had been trying every day to attack the United States," according to two people who attended a symposium and dinner that was closed to the media.

Stevens said he was pleased the president took the risky decision to launch the May 2 commando assault on bin Laden's compound in Pakistan. The justice added, "I must say I was very proud of the SEALs."

No sitting member of the Supreme Court has commented on the bin Laden killing and is not likely to, since current or related executive branch issues may someday come before them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Self defense
I posted this in another thread about this same subject.
bin Laden was planning and plotting to kill Obama, therefore: self defense.
( I'm kind of joking, but kind of not - lol )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. The purists will throw him under the bus too
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. yes it was legal.
However it would have been better to capture him, bring him to trial, convict him for crimes committed,, and punish him according to the law. That would have been more legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. and had he surrendured I would be all for that
If not, though, he is a legitimate military target and ZAPPO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC