Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WSJ lies with statistics to make the rich look poor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:20 PM
Original message
WSJ lies with statistics to make the rich look poor
Source: Mother Jones

Jon Chait takes a closer look at a Wall Street Journal chart intended to suggest that the middle class has all the money:

... Democrats have been arguing that their tax increases should solely affect income over $250,000 a year. The Journal makes that pot of income appear small by divvying it up into seven different lines. See, the $100,000-$200,000 line is tall, and all the other lines to the right of it are short. That tall line must be where the money is!

As a public service, I've redrawn the chart for the Journal. On the left is the original. On the right is the chart that shows the actual amount of money earned by the tiny handful of people making over $200,000. It's a lot.



Read more: http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2011/05/fun-charts-making-rich-look-poor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Do most people file as singles?
You would think the WSJ would be more precise as they must have access to better numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. those 7 bars on the right = about 2% of the population. lol.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Cheap trick.Divided up all those making more than $250 by separating them into millions columns
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. Great catch by Jon Chait.
The original article is hilarious and gives the WSJ a well deserved skewering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wow thats some serious propaganda
You rarely see rags like the WSJ being so obvious in how they present their misinformation. That is a great catch by this guy and I would be curious to see what the WSJ's excuse for doing this would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkyDaddy7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 05:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I think the WSJ will do what all of Murdoch's Propaganda...
Media Companies do as we get closer to the election...IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC