Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Indiana court strips citizens of right to resist unlawful police entry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:12 AM
Original message
Indiana court strips citizens of right to resist unlawful police entry
A little-noticed Indiana Supreme Court decision late last week overturned long-standing precedent and stripped citizens of the right to resist unlawful police entry to their homes, in a move dissenting justices called "breathtaking" and "unnecessarily broad."

The ruling, which came on the appeal of a case in which police subdued a man who refused to allow them entry to an apartment following a report of domestic violence, strikes to the heart of the Constitution's Fourth Amendment, which protects citizens from unlawful search and seizure.

It effectively means that officers may enter any residence without warrant, probable cause or permission of the owner, leaving citizens' only legal recourse against such intrusions in the hands of police review boards or district courts.

" hold that the right to reasonably resist an unlawful police entry into a home is no longer recognized under Indiana law," the court's majority wrote in it's verdict on Richard L. Barnes v. Indiana.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/05/16/indiana-court-strips-citizens-of-right-to-resist-unlawful-police-entry/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bighughdiehl Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. I gotta ask.....
Precisely WHO is behind the persistent and from every angle swipes
at the fourth amendment this past decade?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, since January 20th, 2009 at noon, that would be President Obama's Justice Department...
Edited on Wed May-18-11 06:31 AM by Tesha
...at the Federal level. At lower levels, the various state
Executive branches.

By the way, if the Federales thought anyone's rights had
been trampled upon, even at the state level, they could
intervene on the tramplee's behalf -- 'seen any of that?

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Fuck it's Indiana. Refer to the fourth word in the article...eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GKirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. I don't understand
why it was thought the police didn't have reasonable cause in this case.

"In the case, officers were responding to a report of domestic violence. The suspect was confronted by officers outside his residence and he became belligerant, shouting at the police, who then threatened to arrest him for disorderly conduct.

Reacting to officers, the man returned to his apartment, but when police followed he blocked their path and refused to permit the police entry. When they insisted upon entering, he physically impeded officers and a scuffle ensued."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RegieRocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. How can that be? Isn't that a red state that adores the constitution?
Full of crap regressives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. Now there is this...
(Calif.) lawmakers weigh anti-piracy bill to allow warrantless searches of CD and DVD makers

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4854969


The ball is rolling, picking up speed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. They should take it up to the US Supreme Court
But please wait until we get another appointment or two. It clearly violates the US Constitution.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC