Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate rejects measure to end subsidies for big oil companies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 09:11 AM
Original message
Senate rejects measure to end subsidies for big oil companies


A Democratic measure that would have repealed tax subsidies for the five biggest oil companies failed to clear the Senate on Tuesday, falling short of the 60-vote threshold needed to advance in a near-party-line vote.The Senate rejected S.940, or the “Close Big Oil Tax Loopholes Act,” in a 52-to-48 vote. Three Democrats – Sens. Ben Nelson (Neb.), Mary Landrieu (La.) and Mark Begich (Alaska) – joined nearly all Republican in voting against the measure, while two Republicans – Sens. Susan Collins (Maine) and Olympia Snowe (Maine) – voted “yes.” Democrats had contended that the bill, which would have repealed $21 billion in tax subsidies for the top five oil companies over the next decade, represented a step toward addressing the country’s soaring deficit and rising gas prices. The White House issued an official statement of administration policy earlier Tuesday saying that it strongly backed the bill.

But even as Democratic leaders had been strongly pushing the measure, it was expected that the bill would fall short. That’s the case, too, with a separate energy-related measure that will be on the Senate floor Wednesday – a Republican-sponsored bill aimed at increasing domestic energy production.The end result: the congressional debate over addressing rising gas prices will have little changed by week’s end.Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) maintained Tuesday that the subsidy issue will continue to play a role in the debate over raising the debt ceiling. Asked what he expected to come from the vote on the Democratic measure, Reid told reporters that he expected that a final deal on the debt ceiling would include a repeal of tax subsidies for the top five oil companies.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/2chambers/post/senate-rejects-measure-to-end-subsidies-for-big-oil-companies/2011/05/17/AF6HI35G_blog.html?%3Ftid=sm_twitter_washingtonpost
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not true
52-48 would have ended the subsidt - ReTHUGS and a few Dems filibustered
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. I can't stand Landrieu and the other slimy Dem's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. If the Republicans give us a big stick to beat them with, shouldn't we use it?
They'll attack Medicare, but won't touch the oil subsidies. If there is any doubt who owns them, this vote should help to clear that up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Plutocracy -- once again on ugly display
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. If a tree falls in the forest and no one hears it?
Does it make a sound?

This seems to be a very quite story. It deserves more attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MatthewStLouis Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. Please please please Democrats running for office: Make hay with this!
Even stupid people can understand that a subsidy dollar comes from the same place as a tax dollar!?! Why would this be popular with anyone, besides those beholden to big oil?

Let's hope Dems remember this come election time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. i thought we were going to change the rules this term
to remove this sort of abuse of the filibuster. guess not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. If I could choose a story for the Greatest, this would be it today.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I am depressed over this failure
my contempt for the oily dem's that voted with the repubs:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. The headline is misleading
To say that the Senate "rejects" the measure implies that a majority decided that the bill was a bad idea. That's not what happened. The majority apparently favored the bill.

More accurate would be: "Conservative Senate minority blocks vote on ending subsidies for big oil companies."

For purposes of making hay with this -- which I agree we should do -- the average citizen will probably be even more outraged by our pointing out that the Republicans (and it was largely the Republicans) wouldn't even let this come to a vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC