Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Venting failed twice at Fukushima plant, possibly damaging reactor: TEPCO

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 11:20 AM
Original message
Venting failed twice at Fukushima plant, possibly damaging reactor: TEPCO
TOKYO —

The operator of the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant failed twice to vent steam out of the containment vessel of the No. 2 reactor, most likely resulting in damage done to part of it, a plant operator source said Wednesday.

The failure in the immediate aftermath of the March 11 earthquake and tsunami and subsequent trouble at the plant, such as the release of massive amounts of radioactive material into the air and the discharge of contaminated water, call into question Tokyo Electric Power Co’s crisis management, observers say.

The world’s worst nuclear crisis since the 1986 Chernobyl disaster has yet to be contained, with the government and the utility struggling to restart key cooling functions at most of the six reactors there.

The venting is meant to relieve pressure that is building up inside a reactor’s containment vessel by letting steam escape into the air.

MORE
http://www.japantoday.com/category/national/view/venting-failed-twice-at-fukushima-plant-possibly-damaging-reactor-tepco
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. When are we going to acknowledge that it is the worst
Chernobyl notwithstanding?

Seems we have such a long way to go to contain this one that underestimating its dimensions is a mistake.

Not meant to be a criticism of you Asahinakimi. I am just wondering about the use of this qualifier in every article as if there is not a tipping point where the "worst since Chernobyl" phrase is no longer valid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC