Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congressional leaders sell out the Constitution: Agree to 4 year extension of the Patriot Act

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 08:43 AM
Original message
Congressional leaders sell out the Constitution: Agree to 4 year extension of the Patriot Act

BORDC News Release

May 19, 2011
Congressional leaders sell out the Constitution

Today, the Associated Press reports that "top congressional leaders have agreed to a four-year extension of the USA PATRIOT Act, including... that have been controversial in the past." Decried by voices across the political spectrum, from conservatives Bob Barr, Bruce Fein, and Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), to progressives Russ Feingold and Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL), the PATRIOT Act is being set up—yet again—to force profound abuses on the American people without any meaningful debate.

That is how the PATRIOT Act first came into being 10 years ago—without meaningful debate. Today, despite the prior approval of the Senate Judiciary Committee of a bill introduced by Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) to impose some (albeit inadequate) reforms, the congressional leadership is dictating the result of a long overdue policy debate that has never happened.

Congress has a constitutional responsibility to check and balance the Executive Branch, but has failed that responsibility dramatically. Today's news demonstrates a spectacular bipartisan failure by our nation's political leaders, who have yet again proven their ignorance of the constitutional principles they have sworn to defend.

While grassroots constitutionalists may have ultimately been unable to derail the PATRIOT Act, it has not been for lack of effort. We at the Bill of Rights Defense Committee mobilized more than 1,100 supporters from over 340 congressional districts and all 50 states to raise their voices to members of Congress just last month. And since 2002, we have worked with local communities to pass resolutions opposing the surveillance state in eight states and more than 400 municipalities all over the country.

According to Shahid Buttar, executive director of the Bill of Rights Defense Committee,

This agreement reeks of all the worst things about Washington: secrecy, back-room dealing, institutional co-optation, and bipartisan collusion to undermine constitutional rights. The death of Osama bin Laden offered the hope that our nation's leaders might finally restore sanity to the national security establishment in the wake of mounting documented abuses. Instead, they insulated it from debate and rammed the PATRIOT Act down the throats of hundreds of millions of law-abiding Americans. I am, quite frankly, disgusted.

About the Bill of Rights Defense Committee

Formed in 2001, The Bill of Rights Defense Committee (BORDC) is a national non-profit grassroots organization. We defend the rule of law and rights and liberties challenged by overbroad national security and counter-terrorism policies. BORDC supports an ideologically, ethnically, geographically, and generationally diverse grassroots movement to protect and restore these principles by encouraging widespread civic participation; educating people about the significance of our rights; and cultivating grassroots networks to convert concern, outrage, and fear into debate and action. For more information, visit http://www.bordc.org or call (413) 582-0110.

# # #

http://bordc.org/press/pr-2011-05-19.php

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. the bush/cheney agenda now under new ownership nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. I feel safer . . . .
I really don't need that sarcasm thingie, do I?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
david_vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes, you do
Experience has taught me that you ALWAYS need to state explicitly that you're being sarcastic whenever you are being sarcastic here at DU. There are people here who either have zero sense of humor, even sarcastic humor, or who are completely unable to comprehend different voices in writing. Some, I think, exhibit both characteristics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Are you being sarcastic?

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
david_vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. LOL !! OK, thanks for the chuckle. Good one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. which brings up an interesting point
what does this mean:

:sarcasm:


:sarcasm:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. It's raining sarcasm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. I don't believe it.
Edited on Fri May-20-11 09:09 AM by azul
Maybe a constitutional scholar will give these derelict cowards a stern lecture, on TV, and they will see the light and stop digging the US into a hell hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Better believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. Whose side are they on?

It sure ain't ours but I guess the ruling class feels safer, plenty of tools to keep the rabble in line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. Vote to extend confirms one's agreement with junior that the Constitution is just a piece of paper
and, each who does so, makes a mockery of his/her sacred oath of office imnsho. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC