Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Notice how fast the Tea Party was legitimized?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 02:39 PM
Original message
Notice how fast the Tea Party was legitimized?
Looking back over the past about year and a half, I am amazed at how fast the Tea Party was legitimized and integrated into the lexicon of the news cycle.

As far as I know there is not a real Tea Party as a recognized political party; you can’t register as a member of the Tea Party nor will Tea Party candidates appear as such on a ballot.

But, you can turn on the TV and see Tea Party spokespeople; there are Tea Party representatives and Tea Party leaders.

Wonder what the chances might be of the media conferring the same level of blessing on a Worker’s Party...probably about the same as the rapture actually happening tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. And if you ask, they'll say they aren't part of the republican party,
that they're a mixture of both democrats and republicans. It's all bullshit of course, has been since the beginning. What legitimized them was the media....don't expect a worker's party would get the same media coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. "Smirk." - RepubliCons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #23
36. Olig-opoly.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
54. PROPAGANDA WORKS AGAIN..... RUPERT MURDOCK SHOULD BE ARRESTED FOR SEDITION
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. PLUS ONE...............nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
26. Of course
they'll use one old guy who registered as a Democrat in 1947 as an example of it being a bipartisan movement. However, that one old guy has voted Republic since Reagan and has never bothered to change his party affiliation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Populist_Prole Donating Member (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #26
48. Right around then I began to get a lot of RW email forwards
From RW friends/family. Raving rants trying desperately to sound neutral, exhorting me to "vote the bums out" and how "...I don't care if they're Democrat or Republican..." and "...we need to send a message that..." but curiously enough the ones they wanted to replace them with were all corporatist GOP-ers.

As to their supposed non racist stance, who is that black guy in 1770's "patriot" garb they always trot out to add legitimacy to their claim?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #26
50. He registered as a Dem in 1947 b/c he liked what Strom Thurmond
stood for, racism and states' rights. (FWIW, Thurmond ran for President in 1948 as a States Rights Democratic Party candidate, aka 'Dixiecrat').
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. I love it... it splits the vote on the other side
I doubt there are many Democratics who would be swayed by their rhetoric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Yeah, and adding Ron Paul to the mix splits it even more. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakemewhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. Disturbingly, I'm not sure that's what happened in the mid-term elections
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. you're right--because they were hanging their hopes on it
and acting like butter couldn't ever melt in their mouths.

Then, they didn't have ryan's medicare culling bill hanging over their heads and they hadn't taken the vote to pander to the wealthy at the expense of the middle/working class.

This time out, all of that has taken place. This time out, the monkeys are scrambling up the polls on their side with their stupidity, trying to oust Obama and turn back everything he's put into action in the past 3 years. They are most certainly going to split the votes on their side now because there is no leader on their side. Just a bunch of uneducated fools following a bunch of equally ignorant and rapacious fools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadEyeDyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #21
43. "oust Obama and turn back everything he's put into action in the past 3 years."
Guess again. They want to turn back everything since Lincoln. They want to nullify every amendment after the 10th. They want to do away with the income tax, have senators appointed by governors, throw out the equal-protections, dis-band the United Nations, the National Labor Relations Board, NEA, EPA, AFL-CIO, USDA, TSA, etc. They probably want to restore prohibition and make it legal to kill gays on the spot. When they call themselves the party of Lincoln, they mean it. They want to go back to pre-reconstruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #43
57. That's just about perfectly accurate. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-11 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #43
73. that, too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
david_vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yup. And that study a little while back showed that there are only
about 1500 self-identified "Tea Party" members across the country. They are the most overpublicized bunch EVER on a per-capita basis.

Yeah, the fucking mainstream media... then they wonder why people dismiss them. They're nothing but the big megaphone mechanism for lies, lies, and more lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. +1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
60. 1500? Don't believe it.
I think if you are willing to put a Tea Party bumper sticker on your vehicle, it can be safely stated that you are self-identifieing as a Tea Party follower. I live in a pretty Blue area (NE Ohio), and I see plenty of Tea Partiers here. I can only imagine what it's like in a heavy Red area!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. And though they earlier referred to themselves as "teabaggers'
--even adopting teabags as their symbol, the MSM now censors the term (as was done on Letterman earlier last month with Bill Maher). Yet, when do they call conservatives on their silly damned reference to the Democratic Party as the "Democrat" Party.

Virtually no coverage over 8 years for progressive movements, including anti-war protests involving hundreds of thousands of people... I am beyond fed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. thanks for reminding me
i need to send a letter to NPR. i already know what i want to say. if i relied on NPR for my news i wouldn't even know there was a left in this country, or a politician who isn't a republic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #15
41. I had the same feeling, but I thought I was the only one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #41
44. not at all
i have to slam in the CD half the time because i can't stand listening to it. you'd really think there were nothing but republicans throughout the entire political landscape.
i'll cut them a little bit of slack: they ran a good interview with nancy pelosi yesterday. but the subject wasn't politics, it was sexism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
68. Which is why I heard a n interview with
Sherrod Brown Last Night.

http://www.wksu.org/news/story/28402
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
20. So stop supporting the MSM. Stop reading the MSM. Stop watching the MSM.
Stop listening to the MSM.

You have the internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #20
40. ??????????????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #20
61. They can destroy internet free speech
and likely have plans to do just that. Maybe one day soon we will have two allowable social media networks -Twitter and Facebook. I see that day coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #61
70. I am on neither of the above, neither Twittern nor Facebook.
I like to choose what I eat and drink. And I want to choose what I take into my mind, into my thoughts. I do not want to be controlled by the corporate masters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadEyeDyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
45. sadly, there has not been an anti-war movement since 1975
the sheeple let the rulers run rip-shod over and country and barely say a word. In a way, we need to restore the draft. People oppose the act of war when their own skin is on the line. As long as the war is "over there" and people that they do not know are getting killed, no one complains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. Iagree on the issue of the draft...
I don't see any other way to counter the congressional-military-industrial complex's constant lust for more and more war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
58. "I am beyond fed up."
Me too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. our media created them by treating them as a legitimate party
when they are at best a few screwballs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Proof of that famous liberal media bias.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
62. It's proof.....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. The M$M HAD to do that. The movement started out protesting bailouts
Dangerous!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Having the tea party within the GOP gives the GOP twice the influence
The MSM treats them as a separate entity, even though everyone knows they're Republicans, so they can load up their 'balanced' Sunday pro elites political propaganda shows with two conservatives to one moderate.

(Liberals arent allowed.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
63. But they call the moderates liberals.
That's how they roll. Like Juan Williams was the liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. The humor is no one is showing up to these things anymore
it is a name and a bunch of front companies but the people suckered into the movement during the healthcare scare seem to have left. It's a movement with no support outside the radio and TV media, yet to cross them according to the MSM is something the Republicans can't do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. That's cause the evil librul media, uh, wait a moment.
I'll figure a way to make that make sense. Somehow...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. Folks too busy to notice. Blaming Obama/Dems for everything rather than the corporations
that funded the Teabagger Movement and benefitted from Citizens United.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. We who criticize politicians of both stripes always blame the corporations
and their money. They are the ones that pay the lobbyists that work against us on legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. +1,000. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
53. The corporate funders of the Tea Party have also funded
the ConservaDems so the distinction isn't as absolute as you suggest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. yep.
it's that old liberal media hard at work once again. :puke:

for the record the teabaggers do not constitute a legitimate political movement in my eyes. i resist the corporate media's definition of news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
16. But it's a big movement with real issues that we need to pay attention to.



More of a tea gathering than a party
By Vanessa Silverton-Peel
-
Fri May 20, 2011 1:47 PM EDT

. . .
And yes, that's South Carolina Republican Governor Nikki Haley speaking in the picture.

http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/05/20/6684032-more-of-a-tea-gathering-than-a-party

:smoke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
46. This photo destined to become a classic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. They are Republicans, and not a "party" in their own right.
They are the extreme right wing of the Rs and I refer to them by the name they chose, Teabaggers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
18. I thought some Congressional reps actually ran on the Tea Party ticket
With ZERO mention of the Republican Party.

Are you saying that it's all crap?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
22. K & R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jp11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
24. Maybe because it served the PTB's interest and why they bankrolled the
teapparty and 'took over' their 'movement' to push their agenda under the guise of a grass roots movement. That in addition to the fact that mainstream corporate media 'picks' the news, and the narrative they want to push.

If a worker's party got bankrolled and taken over it might stand a chance of getting a media blessing but only if the taking over corrupted it enough to suit big business etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
27. They were on the ballot here in Florida. However, the State party headquarters
(about a mile from my home) is now closed. The "grassroots" of that group were billionaires and the media corporations that they own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Jefferson Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
29. The Tea Party is not a "legitimate" political party. They are not on the list.
Edited on Sat May-21-11 07:29 AM by Mr. Jefferson
US Political Parties

America First Party
American 3rd Party
American Nazi Party
American Party
American Populist Party
American Reform Party
American Third Position Party
America's Independent Party
Boston Tea Party - (Not to be confused with Tea party movement)
Citizens Party of the United States
Constitution Party
Communist Party of the United States of America
Christian Liberty Party
Democratic Party
Florida Whig Party
Freedom Road Socialist Organization (freedomroad.org faction)
Freedom Road Socialist Organization (frso.org faction)
Freedom Socialist Party
Green Party of the United States
Independent American Party
Independence Party of America
Jefferson Republican Party
Labor Party
Libertarian National Socialist Green Party
Libertarian Party
Moderate Party
Modern Whig Party
National Socialist Movement
New Union Party
Objectivist Party
Party for Socialism and Liberation
Peace and Freedom Party
Populist Party of America
Progressive Labor Party
Prohibition Party
Raza Unida Party
Reform Party of the United States of America
Republican Party
Revolutionary Communist Party, USA
Socialist Action
Socialist Alternative
Socialist Equality Party
Socialist Labor Party of America
Socialist Party USA
Socialist Workers Party
U.S. Marxist–Leninist Organization
United States Marijuana Party
United States Pirate Party
Unity Party of America
Workers Party
Workers World Party
Working Families Party
World Socialist Party of the United States

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2banon Donating Member (794 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #29
35. Wow! No idea there were this many .
yet for all that, we're remain a "two party" electoral system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brother Buzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #29
47. The Tea Party of Nevada qualified with the Nevada Secretary of State and was on the ballot


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #47
59. Ironically, that guy wasn't a teabagger.
Though a right winger, he was sued on behalf of various actual teabagger groups. They were afraid he'd steal votes from the actual tea party candidate: Sharron Angle. This state is constantly at the top. Of the "dumbest state" rankings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
30. A lot of RW corporate establishment money went into the creation of that grassroots movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capitalocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
31. They were pre-approved for a big loan of political capital by the MSM.
A Tea Party protest with 10 people gets more coverage than a peace protest with 100,000. There's a reason for this.

But that political capital is on loan. They will have to pay the piper. Don't expect any bailouts to not happen because of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
32. It all seemed rather . . . well rehearsed . . .
. . . starting in the mainstream with this fascist fuck . . .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zp-Jw-5Kx8k

(special note . . . this rant took place on February 19th 2009 . . . a day short of a whopping one month anniversary of Obama's presidency, of course. So naturally, Obama, to right wing toolbox asshats like Kernen and Santelli, now OWNS Bewsh and Slick Deregulation Willie's mortgage messes. Oh yeah, as I was saying . . . look at the painfully LOW stock market averages at the start of the Obama admin, and look at them today. Seems for all their bitching and crybaby whining about what a commie marxist soshulist hander-outer Obama is, people who are making Koch's and even Santelli's level of bank are making out pretty well if you ask me. Things that DON'T make you go HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM)

. . . followed, of course, by lots of Freedumbworks appearances on CNBC and then Glenn Beck's 9-12 Footshooter Parade, promoted on Faux . . . .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3NwZeJ_coU&playnext=1&list=PL4DD3B7A7A93B0352

Curiouser and curiouser . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #32
65. Well rehearsed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
33. This really shows the power of Newscorp to push an agenda. Don't blame the 'MSM'
MSNBC did their best to ridicule and delegitimize the Tea Parties as did many other outlets. Newscorp muscled this into being legitimate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. As did CNN and CNBC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2banon Donating Member (794 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. as did National Pentagon Radio (NPR)
or some might say National Propaganda for Republicans radio
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
38. Legitimized? It was created from whole cloth by the media. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
39. great point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mosaic Donating Member (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
42. We don't have a media
We have mind control, corporate mind control. Poor sheeple!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
51. The tea party is....was a creature of Fox.
Any group could be "legitimized" by an entity as pervasive as Fox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
52. and they are buring out just as fast...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
55. It was clearly a massive
corporate - media operation to convey legitimacy to the Tea Party. How many times have we heard it was a grass roots movement. I'm still hearing it on TV, and I don't mean on Fox News.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
64. Very well put. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErikJ Donating Member (480 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
66. All Sewers lead to the KOCH BROTHERS
THeir Freedom Works and RW think-tanks work closely with the media especially FOx.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
67. about as fast as the anti-war movement was marginalized
Reality is fungible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radhika Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
69. And unions and public employees got transformed...
into useless, archaic and parasitic institutions. Not worthy of an invite onto the esteemed Sunday morning Republican propanganda shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
71. Late +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
72. It's "If it bleeds, it leads."
I don't mean that the tea party literally bleeds, only that the media is drawn to dramatic narratives, and red-faced, sign-waving people fit the bill. Never mind that the ultimate insiders (billionaires, wife of Supreme Court justice, former majority leader of the House) were openly associated with it. Never mind that it's not a grassroots movement. Never mind that it doesn't even represent the majority of the country.

Just call out the cameras, fire up the computers, give it up for the Big Dramatic Story. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC