|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
AlanCranston (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:15 PM Original message |
with hindsight do you wish Bush 41 won in 92 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
1. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Morning Dew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
2. Not just no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
I Have A Dream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. +1! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
3. ummm... WTF? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlanCranston (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. the so called "Gingrich Revolution" of 1994 was probably |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:21 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. You think it would not have been worse if bush had a second term? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndiMer (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:57 PM Response to Reply #10 |
29. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:44 PM Response to Reply #5 |
21. Every once in a while the public needs to see exactly what level of flaming fucktards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Davis_X_Machina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
6. Clinton would not have gotten the nomination... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlanCranston (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:20 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. what's so bad about sam nunn? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:43 PM Response to Reply #9 |
19. Sam Nunn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
7. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
8. nope, politics just isn't like that , the it needs to get worse so we can get a payoff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PCIntern (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
11. "Interesting..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
12. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
13. Why would any Democrat wish for a Republican win in hindsight? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
14. Hell NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
av8rdave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
15. Good God...why would ANYONE have wanted to see another term of that waste of gravity? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Journeyman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
16. I wish Clinton had swept in solid Democratic majorities in both chambers in '92. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
17. No - do you wish we had rescinded the 22nd Amendment in 2003 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lpbk2713 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
18. You're quite mad, aren't you Alan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
20. I'm still mad about Dewey losing to Truman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
22. No. Not even slightly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
23. no n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
24. Wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KeyserSoze87 (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
25. 16 years of repuke presidents? No thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
26. Hahahahahahaha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
27. Let's use hindsight and prevent Bush 41 and Barbra from having Bush 43. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
road2000 (995 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
28. Not only no, but hell, no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
30. Never |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
31. No thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underseasurveyor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
32. Are you nutz? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PufPuf23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
33. Hell no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
34. No, I don't. Because things don't happen in the sort of simple, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlanCranston (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 06:13 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. when you said that Bush's thinking was not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rurallib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
35. only in nightmares. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
37. Maybe HW would have got Bin Laden. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cameozalaznick (624 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
38. Hell no... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 07:23 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. didn't Nixon Lose one time? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Motown_Johnny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
39. That would move W back four years, and he would be in his second term now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-22-11 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
41. Wayback machine says no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 13th 2024, 02:47 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC