Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

You Don't Own Your Twitpic Photos

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
WillParkinson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 08:57 AM
Original message
You Don't Own Your Twitpic Photos
Edited on Mon May-23-11 08:57 AM by WillParkinson
You Don't Own Your Twitpic Photos

If you use the popular service Twitpic to post photos to Twitter, here's some interesting news.

World Entertainment News Network, a news and photo agency, announced this month that it had become the “exclusive photo agency partner” of Twitpic, a service with over 20 million registered users that allows people to upload images and link to them on Twitter. The deal allows the agency to sell images posted on Twitpic for publication, and to pursue legal action against those who use such images commercially without its permission, according to the agency. “There has been much unauthorized use of Twitpic images which we shall be addressing without delay,” said Lloyd Beiny, the agency’s chief executive.

http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2011/05/you-dont-own-your-twitpic-photos.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/23/technology/23terms.html?_r=3&adxnnl=1&ref=business&adxnnlx=1306155614-5vjZwYiYT21s34CP8ZN3kw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. I like this bit in the NYT link
The extent of that control is typically laid out in the terms of service that users agree to when they sign up for Internet services and smartphone applications. But the more such services people use, the harder it becomes to keep track of the things to which they are agreeing. And of course many terms of service, which are heavy on legal language, include clauses that assert the company’s right to change them without notice.

In a recent episode, the television show “South Park” poked fun at the tendency to consent to such agreements without reading them, when one character discovered that he had inadvertently given Apple the right to surgically transform him into a “product that is part human and part centipede, and part Web browser and part e-mailing device.” In the real world, there has been more discussion of what users could be risking than concrete examples of problems. Much attention has been centered on privacy concerns and the confusing aspects of companies’ privacy policies.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. If a all services have the same 'legal agreements'
Creating a monopoly of service, then by the damage to systems caused by monopolies, none of the terms of service are valid.

I follow some out of courtesy, but also know none can be applied legally to any situation. They are part of a broken system and have no legal or lawful enforcement. Sure they can by edict try to impose something, or by other monopoly followship of other groups get someone to censor or distort something, but they also are doing such things illegally regardless of terms of service.

In a free society, if a service has a social purpose for the advancement of that society, any rule imposed without citizen consent in monopoly fashion is not a legal law.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Copyright honeypot. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HappyMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. No twitter, no problem. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. They're "authorized" to sell your pics, but don't have to split the profits with you?
Edited on Mon May-23-11 09:24 AM by rocktivity
Well then, no twitpic for me -- I'll just keep linking them the "old-fashioned" way.

:mad:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. The righthaven of Twitter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zephie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
7. Just deleted all my photos on twitpics
I'll stick with photobucket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC