Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Billionaire-funded "advocacy" groups are changing public education forever. Naming them matters.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 10:29 AM
Original message
Billionaire-funded "advocacy" groups are changing public education forever. Naming them matters.
These advocacy groups often claim to be grassroots groups, and they advocate for reforming public schools. They push for parental choice, vouchers, charter schools, ending the power teachers have through collective bargaining, ending teacher job security by getting rid of tenure.

They have myriad tasks, but their goals are usually set by the foundations that fund them.

The New York Times has a revealing article about how Bill Gates and his foundation are spending huge amounts to get education done his way. It's working because money talks loudly.

Behind Grass-Roots School Advocacy, Bill Gates

A handful of outspoken teachers helped persuade state lawmakers this spring to eliminate seniority-based layoff policies. They testified before the legislature, wrote briefing papers and published an op-ed article in The Indianapolis Star.


That means they persuaded them to get rid of tenure and begin to layoff teachers with seniority.

They described themselves simply as local teachers who favored school reform — one sympathetic state representative, Mary Ann Sullivan, said, “They seemed like genuine, real people versus the teachers’ union lobbyists.” They were, but they were also recruits in a national organization, Teach Plus, financed significantly by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.


Rather a strange statement from a state rep who appears to have preset views. "genuine, real people versus the teachers’ union lobbyists." What an odd thing to say.

...The foundation spent $373 million on education in 2009, the latest year for which its tax returns are available, and devoted $78 million to advocacy — quadruple the amount spent on advocacy in 2005. Over the next five or six years, Mr. Golston said, the foundation expects to pour $3.5 billion more into education, up to 15 percent of it on advocacy.

Given the scale and scope of the largess, some worry that the foundation’s assertive philanthropy is squelching independent thought, while others express concerns about transparency. Few policy makers, reporters or members of the public who encounter advocates like Teach Plus or pundits like Frederick M. Hess of the American Enterprise Institute realize they are underwritten by the foundation.


There is a very revealing statement from Hess. He says "“As researchers, we have a reasonable self-preservation instinct...there can be an exquisite carefulness about how we’re going to say anything that could reflect badly on a foundation. Everybody’s implicated,” he added.

Not surprisingly two unions, the AFT and the NEA are listed among the groups receiving funding. They received 6.3 million from Gates over 3 years. Lot of money. The Perdido Street blog made a list of all the groups listed in the NYT article who are receiving Gates money.

Nothing grassroots about these groups

Let's list the groups, organizations, institutions, notable education reform individuals and media companies that are named in the Times article as on the Gates Foundation payroll:

1. Teach Plus
2. The Education Trust
3. Education Week
4. Education Equality Project
5. Harvard University (which got a $3.5 million grant to place “strategic data fellows” who could act as “entrepreneurial change agents” in school districts in Boston, Los Angeles and elsewhere)


I just realized that may be why Chris Christie was given such a warm welcome at Harvard's School of Education. He embodies the reforms the billionaires want.

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — Conservatives may see Harvard as the heart of liberal darkness, but on Friday it gave a warm, even enthusiastic reception to Gov. Chris Christie and his ideas on education overhaul.

Speaking to almost 200 students and staff members at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, the New Jersey governor drew rounds of applause with his talk of sharply limiting teacher tenure, rigorously evaluating teachers and administrators, curbing the power of teachers’ unions and pledging to appoint more-conservative justices to the State Supreme Court.


Here are more of the groups listed at Perdido Street blog.

6. Scores of other schools and universities
7. The National Governors Association
8. Council of Chief State School Officers
9. Achieve Inc.
10. The Alliance for Excellent Education
11. The Fordham Institute
12. The Center on Education Policy (which laughingly touts itself as "independent" while sucking on the Gates Foundation largesse)
13. The New Teacher Project
14. The AFT and the NEA
15. The ad campaign for "Waiting for Superman"
(Gates spent 2 million to publicize the movie.)


A few more:

16. Foundation for Educational Excellence, founded by Jeb Bush, a former governor of Florida
17. Educators for Excellence
18. Frederick Hess, education writer and blogger, member of the American Enterprise Institute
19. NPR and other public media


Also interesting is the information on other foundations funding "advocacy" groups to push for privatizing education. Here is an article from Think Progress.

Meet The Billionaires Who Are Trying To Privatize Our Schools And Kill Public Education

– Dick DeVos: The DeVos family has been active on education issues since the 1990's. The son of billionaire Amway co-founder Richard DeVos, Sr., DeVos unsuccessfully ran for governor of the state of Michigan, spending $40 million, the most ever spent in a gubernatorial race in the state. In 2002, Dick DeVos sketched out a plan to undermine public education before the Heritage Foundation, explaining that education advocates should stop using the term “public schools” and instead call them “government schools.” He has poured millions of dollars into right-wing causes, including providing hundreds of thousands of dollars into seed money for numerous “school choice” groups, including Utah’s Parents for Choice in Education, which used its PAC money to elect pro-voucher politicians.


And Betsy DeVos.

– Betsy DeVos: The wife of Dick DeVos, she also coincidentally happens to be the sister of Erik Prince, the leader of Xe, the mercenary outfit formerly known as Blackwater and is a former chair of the Republican Party of Michigan. Mrs. DeVos has been much more aggressive than her husband, pouring her millions into numerous voucher front groups across the country. She launched the pro-voucher group All Children Matter in 2003, which spent $7.6 million in its first year alone to impact state races related vouchers, winning 121 out of 181 races in which it intervened. All Children Matter was found breaking campaign finance laws in 2008, yet has still not paid its $5.2 million fine. She has founded and/or funded a vast network of voucher front groups, including Children First America, the Alliance for School Choice, Kids Hope USA, and the American Federation for Children.


That is at least five voucher front groups funded by her.

Other groups founded by the DeVos family that are listed are – - American Federation for Children (AFC) and Alliance for School Choice (ASC).

Think Progress then mentions Bill and Susan Oberndorf and the groups they fund. The ones mentioned are AFC, the Center for Education Reform, and the Brighter Choice Foundation.

Then the article speaks of The Walton Foundation and their funding of "the New York-based Brighter Choice Foundation, half a million dollars to the Florida School Choice Fund, $105,000 to the Foundation for Educational Choice, $774,512 to the Friends of Educational Choice, $400,000 to School Choice Ohio, and gave $50,000 to the Piton Foundation to promote a media campaign around the Colorado School Choice website — all in 2009 alone."

And the Think Progress article does not even mention the Broad Foundation. However a parents' blog does.

The question I ask is why should Eli Broad and Bill Gates have more of a say as to what goes on in my child’s classroom than I do? – Sue Peters, Seattle parent

The Gates Foundation, the Walton Family Foundation, and the Broad Foundation form a powerful triumvirate. The combined net worth of the three families who operate these foundations is $152 billion. By strategically deploying their immense wealth through training school leaders, financing think-tank reports, and supporting “Astro Turf” advocacy groups, these three foundations have been able to steer the direction of education reform over the past decade.

The Broad Foundation is the least wealthy of the three, but has still spent nearly $400 million on its mission of “transforming urban K-12 public education through better governance, management, labor relations and competition.” But what does that actually mean?

The signature effort of the Broad Foundation is its investment in its training programs, operated through the Broad Center for the Management of School Systems and the Broad Institute for School Boards. The Broad Center for the Management of School Systems is the larger of the two and consists of two programs: the Broad Superintendents Academy and the Broad Residency in Urban Education.


The attack on public schools has been a long time in the making. It's organized, and it's ruthless. It is not a game to the reformers. They are deadly serious, and they are not listening to teachers or parents.

The power of big money is showing now, and there is no one defending public education except a few bloggers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. More astroturf.
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. ....
Great doggie picture. Did you make that avatar?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Thanks!
That's my dog, Dante.

I made the avatar. It's an homage to Ed Emberly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. Cui bono?
Important question, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. Too bad these rich fucks don't put their time and $ into a jobs program
eradicating poverty instead of creating more

Fuck em
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. The problem started a long time ago...
When the top tax rate was lowered from 91%, allowing people to accumulate billions in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. His way was not completing college.
Is Bill Gates encouraging college students to drop out and start their own businesses? Perhaps such a policy would create jobs, and reduce the level of student debt.

The New York Times has a revealing article about how Bill Gates and his foundation are spending huge amounts to get education done his way.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. Their big money is why they can hire our administration to do their work.
Republicans couldn't have done it for them. They needed a mole in the party of the people to bore a hole in the soul of the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. Bookmarked and thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. K & R !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. what is the endgame?
I haven't been able to figure out if it's to be a dumbed down populace that doesn't question the authority of the educators, or what?

Seriously, I am at loss.

At first I thought it was just a way to skim the public tax dollars into the hands of the chosen foundations and their fronts. These people seem to have more than enough unless to them it isn't enough as yet to get along.(I left the commas out).

I'm watching this in Florida, the ransacking of the public school system and the creation of jebbies dream.

Any advice or tutelage will be appreciated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I would say the endgame is profit.
Money and power. Companies who do tests, score tests, write the textbooks, etc. will make huge profit as well as the management companies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Thats the rank-and-file reformers
For some of the billionaire reformers (i.e. Bill Gates) I believe it's misguided philanthropy. He genuinely wants to help, but his genuine source of knowledge on the subject is Michelle Rhee, etc.. I don't tell him how to run Microsoft. Why not? Because it would end in tears for everybody. He is equally qualified to tell me how to do mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. poor widdle billy, he wants to do good so much but he just doesn't understand.....nah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. I think you give him too much credit
I don't think he's nearly as smart as people give him credit for. I think he's mostly a well-meaning ignoramus, without the brain-power to be an evil genius overseeing the destruction of public education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
erodriguez Donating Member (532 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Gates teaming up with pearson to make digital ed products.

I'm sure some very smart people at Microsoft have already found a way to profit from this.

http://perdidostreetschool.blogspot.com/2011/04/real-reason-for-common-core.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Yep, Gates' funding was really behind the Common Core standards.
It's amazing how much power he has been given by the DOE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. gates foundation is basically making education policy. seriously. common core isn't the only thing
they've written.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. True.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. All of the above
First, they dumb down the population. Then, they swoop in with their private sector solutions, promises to "fix" the problem, all for a "small" fee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
14. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarsInHerHair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. ending tenure is like having a new substitute teacher every week, I hope
someone reminds parents of this little fact. Too bad Hollywood isn't itself anymore, the Golden Age stood firmly with teachers & education. Only billionaires can fight billionaires, may I be wrong on this, but......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Very good points
Having a teacher in a stable environment, able to trust that her job won't be in jeopardy because of experience or a nit-picking principal is the ideal way.

Now teachers will be caught up in the web of politics and ideology being used to privatize education.

And there are no billionaires standing up for teachers in public schools. None at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hapkidogal Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
23. You'll be interested in this
You may already know the information included but I find it alarming. Thanks for all the information you provide. http://www.alternet.org/teaparty/151046/the_creepy_christian_dogma_pushed_by_religious_schools_that_are_supported_by_your_tax_dollars/?page=entire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
25. One group, Teach Plus, had to change their website statement.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/post/teach-plus-changes-web-site-to-reflect-reality/2011/05/23/AFeDJv9G_blog.html

Original statement after being given over 4 million by Gates.

"Research makes clear that teachers are the most important variable in student success, yet the profession is not organized to reward excellence, promote teacher development, or retain top performers in the classroom.”

The statement now after WP's Valerie Strauss contacted them .

"Research actually doesn’t show that; decades of studies show that home-based factors, especially the education level of a child’s mother, has the most influence on student achievement. Teachers may be the significant factor in student progress in the school building.

I asked Celine Coggins, chief executive officer, about this and she immediately corrected the Web site page to say:

Research makes clear that teachers are the most important school-based variable in student success, yet the profession is not organized to reward excellence, promote teacher development, or retain top performers in the classroom."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC