Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Democrats back Obama on trade deals delay

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 12:25 AM
Original message
Senate Democrats back Obama on trade deals delay
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/24/us-usa-trade-deals-idUSTRE74M4UD20110524

(Reuters) - Forty-one Senate Democrats told President Barack Obama on Monday they agreed with his decision to not send three free-trade agreements with South Korea, Colombia and Panama to Congress until Republicans agree to renew an expanded worker-retraining program.

"We recognize, as you do, that such a deal will be challenging to secure because it requires significant bipartisan commitments in both chambers of Congress to vote in favor of a TAA (Trade Adjustment Assistance) extension," the senators said in a letter.

"The challenge is worth it. We agree with you that strengthening the safety net for the middle class by extending TAA should be a prerequisite for consideration of new trade agreements," the senators said.

The letter from more than three-quarters of the 51 Democrats in the Senate shows the hard bargaining that is still needed to win approval of the free-trade agreements with the three nations remaining from the administration of former President George W. Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. There are so many Americans against free trade agreements.
53% in US Say Free Trade Hurts Nation: NBC/WSJ Poll

And yet it's hard or impossible to find anyone from either party to vote for who can be expected to oppose more free trade agreements. Now why do you think this is so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Because its complicated
and our political system and media is dominated by corporate interests who are free market fundamentalists. Also, most people dont even realize there is any sort of alternative. I would say maybe 1 in 100 people in this country are even aware of what the term "fair-trade" means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Pew Research (Nov 2010) showed the same thing by 44% to 35%.
http://people-press.org/2010/11/09/public-support-for-increased-trade-except-with-south-korea-and-china/



The public is of two minds when it comes to trade with other countries. Most Americans say that increased trade with Canada, Japan and European Union countries – as well as India, Brazil and Mexico – would be good for the United States. But reactions are mixed to increased trade with South Korea and China.

Support for free trade agreements is now at one of its lowest points in 13 years of Pew Research Center surveys. In 2008, an identical percentage (35%) said free trade agreements were good for the U.S. Support for free trade agreements had increased last year, to 44% in April and 43% in November, despite the struggling economy.



Republicans and Republican-leaning independents who agree with the Tea Party have a particularly negative view of the impact of free trade agreements. Only about a quarter of Republicans who agree with the Tea Party (24%) say that free trade agreements like NAFTA and the policies of the WTO have been a good thing for the United States, while 63% say they have been a bad thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Framing is so important.
Americans are in favor of fair trade. What most of us are opposed to is wide open free trade agreements with no tariffs or any other kind of protection for US workers. There are those who try to conflate the two concepts, to make it seem that public opinion is something that it is not. Even worse, they try to make people believe that we must embrace free trade agreements if we want to participate in any form of international trade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. How 'bout we just toss those "free-trade" agreements right out the window. Then we don't have to
Edited on Tue May-24-11 07:06 AM by Brickbat
worry about worker retraining when the their jobs are outsourced! Perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC