Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feds to require 'black box' in all vehicles; insurers can view data in 37 states

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 08:53 AM
Original message
Feds to require 'black box' in all vehicles; insurers can view data in 37 states
Source: Wired

Next month, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is expected to declare that all vehicles must contain an event data recorder, known more commonly as a “black box.” The device, similar to those found in aircraft, records vehicle inputs and, in the event of a crash, provides a snapshot of the final moments before impact.

That snapshot could be viewed by law enforcement, insurance companies and automakers. The device cannot be turned off, and you’ll probably know little more about it than the legal disclosure you’ll find in the owner’s manual.

The pending mandate looks to some like a gross overreach of government authority, or perhaps an effort by Uncle Sam, the insurance industry and even the automakers to keep tabs on what drivers are doing. But if you’re driving a car with airbags, chances are there’s already one of these devices under your hood.

How much it affects you depends upon where you live and what data points it records. How much it will affect you in the future may depend on a new set of standards that spell out exactly what data is collected and who can access it.

Read more: http://www.wired.com/autopia/2011/05/automotive-black-boxes/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. And will they be recording conversation in the cockpit too?
I'd rather have a nanny state than a security state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. They tried this a few years in pickup trucks in several southern states

However, the recorded conversation from moments before each fatal crash was always the same thing:

"Hey, Willis, watch this!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badtoworse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. "...hold my beer and watch this."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Ah, thanks, I had the feeling I left something out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rrneck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Amd the guy behind him says
"Shit I can do that."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. I'd rather have neither. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Would be preferable.
However, I'd rather have someone setting standards for education or food safety or medical treatment than someone invading my privacy in the name of protecting me. Out of my house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. The insurance industry has been pushing for this for years so they can deny claims.
"Ooops - black box says you were SPEEDING - doing 66 in a 65 zone. Claim denied."

Yes, that's intended to be an extreme example, but it might not be as far fetched as it sounds. If the history shows rapid acceleration or any other "risky" driving behavior prior to an accident, they'll use it to deny the claim and good luck fighting them in court. The legal fees would probably far exceed the cost of just buying a new car on your own.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. "pending mandate looks to some like a gross overreach of government authority"
Edited on Tue May-24-11 09:19 AM by marmar
It's government officials doing what their corporate masters tell them to, known less politely as fascism.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. Not to worry
Los Angeles will keep them so busy the won't have time for anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. I'm a bit of a nitpicker about language.
I'll just point out that a bicycle is a vehicle..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
10. consumers regulated.... corporations not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
11. That technology has been in cars for a long time already...
But up until now just mostly dealers and mechanics had been pulling the data (usually to void a factory warranty or something)...

It would have been nice if the blogger had interviewed an insurance lobbyist, since they are the ones who spent millions to make this mandate a reality...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
12. I'm gonna go into the black box fuse removal business
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Rather than remove it,
you need to do something that makes it look like an inadvertent short or something.

"Oh darn, the fuse blew so the box wasn't recording."

Not that I'm advocating that anyone actually do anything like that. It's probably illegal and would likely turn on the "check engine" light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. Cars are no different than any other piece of machinery
Know how to hack one, you know how to hack the general principle of another.

This is an overreach, yes, but while I don't think like a criminal, the only way this gets introduced to the public is that they don't know about it.

Now I know. Hell, everyone should know about this. Police states happen because of excessive secrecy. Knowledge is power has never been more true than today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
14. I predict a cottage industry in hacking these things ... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Me too n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
15. Don't you want one in your house, too?
So "they" can see if you are actually screwing the housewife across the street, or if you said something inappropriate to a bill collector?

I want monitoring so that I can no longer express my individuality, can no longer be a human being, but be viewed as a perpetrator in every aspect of my life regardless of whether or not I am one.

Oh wait - I walked past a child today that was crying, and I didn't accidentally immediately pick that child up because I could lose my job for being late, yet it's incumbent on me to tend to every single human being in this world.

When we stop being human beings and are expected to act like robots, and we ACCEPT it, we are our own demise.

You think it stops with cars? You think it stops with "perpetrators"? It never does. It gets used as a tool to control the populous, and you are a fool if you think controlling human beings like cattle stops with "just the people that deserve to be treated like cattle" - because soon, you are also treated that way. Read history if you doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC