Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Members of Congress Get Abnormally High Returns From Their Stocks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 09:00 AM
Original message
Members of Congress Get Abnormally High Returns From Their Stocks
Edited on Wed May-25-11 09:00 AM by KansDem
Members of the House of Representatives considerably outperform the stock market in their personal investments, according to a new academic study.

Four university researchers examined 16,000 common stock transactions made by approximately 300 House representatives from 1985 to 2001, and found what they call "significant positive abnormal returns," with portfolios based on congressional trades beating the market by about 6 percent annually.

What's their secret? The report speculates, but does not conclude, it could have something to do with the ability members of Congress have to trade on non-public information or to vote their own pocketbooks -- or both.

A study of senators by the same team of researchers five years ago found members of the higher chamber even better at beating the market -- outperforming it by about 10 percent, an amount the academics said was "both economically large and statistically significant."


--more--
Huffington Post

I'm shocked! Shocked, I tell you!
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/__vjcuVchhnA/TPEoCPHerQI/AAAAAAAAC0A/7fWj62USfhA/s1600/Claude+Rains+-+casablanca145.jpeg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Martha Stewart went to prison for less
They cannot be above the law (provided the laws haven't been dismantled.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. Who could imagine?

And whose side are they on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scruffy1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Your not going to sell a politician a loser on purpose.
Having worked in the brokerage business for a while in the past I can speculate that prominent people like politicians don't get dumped on by brokers in order to clear out some inventory or to generate large commissions. Both of these practices are common. Of course brokerage houses are not always right either. I know of one broker who sold a lot of a certain stock because the house wanted to dump it and it later went from $2.00 to $70.00. When he sold it he was only looking at the commission.
If they were trading for their own account it's a different picture, but even then I think they get some pretty good advice. Of course being on the inside of regulation and other changes gives them a huge edge, not to mention future government contracts.
I think all Congresspeople should be barred from security trading in any way shape or form. Same with governors and state legislators, regulators and anyone else that has government power over finances. This is easily done with a blind trust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hmm. Someone should set up a "Senatorial Tracking Fund".
They'd be able to charge a hefty commission. But, would/should it be legal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Now that is a brilliant idea..
I bet you could sell a lot of people on that..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Unfortunately we don't know about their trades until months/years later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Since when did a little obstacle like that stop the financial services industry?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 03:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yup. Access to the information would be key.
I'd guess some of them, a large enough sample perhaps, would be happy to sell the info, in exchange for a cut of the profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. Oh, you're just being suspicious.
They do better because of their higher intellect and shrewd business sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC