Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Remember when the right (and the PUMAs) wanted Obama to apologize for

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 12:34 AM
Original message
Remember when the right (and the PUMAs) wanted Obama to apologize for

saying that folks "clinged to the bibles and guns"?



Yes.. this isn't anything like calling someone a "slut"... but my point is that the "enemy" demanded an apology.

They didn't get one.

They lost.



Apologies are only for people who you want to reconcile with.... that are CAPABLE of being reconciled with.

The right-wing in this country are the moral equivalent of snakes... no apology will ever be enough, so it should never ever be given.


It's the same bullshit they tried with their faux outrage over Common reading poetry at the White House.



Do. not. give. the. fuckers. one. inch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Liquorice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Would you feel that way if he had called Herman Cain the N word? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. 1) Herman Cain isn't the loathsome human being that Laura Ingraham is

and

2) "slut" isn't even in the same universe as "nigger" in terms of how severe it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liquorice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. There was a time when the n word was not "that bad" either. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. So its a matter of degrees with you?
How far out do you wish to take your degrees? How far do you have to lower yourself? Meh.... this is totally pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. What are you talking about?
Pathetic. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. You are trying to argue for severity ???
You want permission to use something less severe? So you figure you can just make up a chart in your head as to what degree of severity is okay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liquorice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Sexism isn't as bad as racism to a lot of people, apparently. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Calling someone a "slut" is no more sexist than calling someone a "prick"

Insulting? yes.

Sexist? nope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liquorice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. That is a bunch of bs. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Very_Boring_Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. Because "Slut" has historical and cultural connotations that "prick" does not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. what are they? not trying to be a prick, i just want to hear someone make the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Very_Boring_Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. Charges of sexual promiscuity have been used to attack women for millenia
Women have traditionally been seen as sexual objects. The word "slut" reaffirms this view because it treats the woman's character as being based solely around their sexual habits. There is no historical equivalent for "prick"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. for millenia? are you sure? at any rate, the word "slut" didn't mean
Edited on Thu May-26-11 03:45 AM by Hannah Bell
that until about 1700, and didn't mean that exclusively until perhaps the 19th century.

and there *are* masculine equivalents: lecher and whoremonger spring immediately to mind. Rake/rakehell & debauch = i looked up.

they're not common outside books today but lecher actually had its current connotation much earlier than slut did.

also negatively-connoted words for men who live off prostitutes (though not equivalent to slut) -- pimp, ponce, panderer. Whereas the female "madam" does not have such strong negative connotation.

"traditionally" is a big word and you're making big generalizations. and i don't think you can make them about "millenia".

imo, feminism is a filter like any other, & imo, unless combined with others it tends to mystify male/female relationships into some kind of weird individual male original sin.

anyway, thanks for explaining why you feel the way you do.


"The Rake's Progress"






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojeoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 03:53 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. In the 14th Century it was "Poxy Doxy!"
That way you insulted the woman's sexuality and called her a syphilis carrier too.


We proud sluts have been trying to take BACK the slut word anyway.

And sleazy politicians are whores or rather prostitutes anyways. They get paid. Sluts do it for fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 04:34 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. doubtful as 14th century = 1300s & "doxy" isn't attributed until the
Edited on Thu May-26-11 04:36 AM by Hannah Bell
until mid 1500s at all.

i believe "poxy doxy" is from an edith sitwell poem.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojeoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #37
42. You may br correct about the century, but "Poxie Doxie" was a
street slur of the peasant classes. The peasant classes didn't read poems.

Poems read the stories of the ages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. You are wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. You are a woman - I shouldn't
have to explain this to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. it's like a secret club? i didn't get the password.
Edited on Thu May-26-11 02:12 AM by Hannah Bell
i don't feel any more offended when people insult me on the basis of my gender than i do when they insult me on the basis of my intelligence, my looks, my bankroll, my skills, my status, whatever.

all insults are intended to diminish the other. so long as they stay at the level of personal insults, i can handle that. i can talk myself out of feeling diminished, & i am capable of fighting back.

it's when they're accompanied by other manifestations of power that it becomes alarming. but that applies to any kind of insult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lillypaddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #11
38. I agree!
I think it's getting ridiculous, including at DU, how every little word is jumped upon. I've earned my feminist "credentials" over the years. It's stupid to say this was a sexist remark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. No...
Edited on Thu May-26-11 01:06 AM by AsahinaKimi
after all we are "JUST WOMEN", what do we know? :sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. no one said that. why do you pretend someone said or implied something they didn't?
Edited on Thu May-26-11 01:53 AM by Hannah Bell
why do you invent an imaginary insult?

not trying to be personal, but i don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
40. ne..
Edited on Thu May-26-11 02:41 PM by AsahinaKimi
dansei no koto ga wakaranai no desu. gomen nasai.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. what is "sexism" to you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. Becuase in the totality of it all.
Edited on Thu May-26-11 12:50 AM by RandomThoughts
An inch is all you will ever have, and the most important thing to ever have.

Valerie's Letter
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0lYIBjCpco

Function not data, although you are correct if someone wants you to apologize to then use it against you, not for healing it doesn't mean anything for them to want you to apologize.

They are not trying to help you heal, but trying to find a way to hurt you.

So the idea behind what you say makes sense. And you are speaking about integrity when someone tries to get you to apologize to hurt you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hardcover Donating Member (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. Hey! I am a PUMA.
Show some respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
givemebackmycountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. No, I don't think so.
Unless you are a sneaker, the term PUMA is now irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
22. I don't even remember what a PUMA is any more. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. I think it is
Situation Normal, All Fouled Up

no, wait, that cannot be right

maybe Self Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus

no.

uhm Light Amplification by the Stimulated Emmission of Radiation

no

got it

Party Unity, My Austria
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. Not one fucking inch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
16. he should have apologized if he said "clinged," though. for grammatical sin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
25. you seem to be remembering it wrong
"Obama initially reacted to the resultant media firestorm over the weekend by trying to stand by his comments. But he later apologised, saying: "If I worded things in a way that made people offended, I deeply regret that.""

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/apr/14/barackobama.uselections2008

Plus, there were no PUMAs at the time, since the primary had not really been decided yet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. that's the old, "i'm sorry if you were offended" ploy. not really an apology.
he's not really saying he said anything out of line.

just sorry "he worded it" in a way that "made people offended".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. well, "the purpose of an apology is not to accept blame
it's to make a sarcastic or disparaging remark and yet later be able to say "I apologized, what more do you want?""

But Obama definitely did some back-tracking. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7344532.stm

"After a storm of criticism from his rivals, Hillary Clinton and Republican John McCain, Mr Obama said he "didn't say it as well as I should have"."

"At a rally in Indiana on Saturday, Mr Obama conceded his description had been clumsy and not conveyed its intended meaning.

He said he believed many voters were indeed bitter about the economy and that he had meant to say that "when you're bitter you turn to what you can count on"."

He wasn't standing by his comments, just trying to claim he meant something different.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
32. We are a weird culture
that requires an apology for being honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. There is no "honesty" in attacking a woman's gender/sexual morals...
for her POLITICAL VIEWS.

It's STUPID and sexist....Men have to start

talking to and about women in relation to their

Minds and Characters

in the same NON-sexual way

that they do men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wickerwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
34. Why do you think it is only the right that should get an apology?
I think he should apologize to all women, not just right wing ones. Dragging a woman's sex life into a completely unrelated conversation in order to denigrate her is a really shitty, retrograde thing to do. And it doesn't matter that it's "one of our own" doing it. It just means he should have known better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 04:12 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. +100
DU boasts some very slow learners on this issue.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
39. no. the apology is saying, i am better than this, forgot for a moment. bible and guns
in full context in no way was a slight. so nothing to apologize for.

slut was a slight

ed did fine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
41. Obama did apologize for how that one came across.
He did it lamely in a debate I think. He said that wasn't how he meant it at all, that he'd said it better previously, it was even on taped shows.
Then his voice faded and his time was up and no one believed him.

After he had won the election, not sure if he was president yet, he had a long interview with either New Yorker or NY Times Sunday magazine. Anyway in it he said that incident was his greatest regret, how it sounded like an insult and was no meant that way at all and he still thought about it.

Oh my Obama. Why didn't he just release that blip from Charlie Rose from a few years earlier where he said it the normal way he meant it?
People were upset about that comment as though it was bitterness that turned people to those things. Even Chris Matthews brought it up a lot just shocked that it must be the real way he feels about those people and he tells rich friends.
But no one upset about it talking to me during campaign stayed upset. I showed blog posts from people who were there and the circumstances around it and then what he said in past regarding that and suddenly they saw the meaning of it as a compassionate one, not a judging one. Many were shocked the media never showed that

Anyway that's not really the point but what is the point is he regretted it deeply and for a long time. A real apology for how it sounded and a brief showing of the fuller picture might have done him a lot of good, not be a lingering thing he regretted most.

Ed seemed to deeply regret what he said. In this case not the misunderstanding... he did use that word. Seems once he thought about it and his wife and likely bosses got to him he was deeply sorry. Made to apologize or not I think he would want to

In case anyone cares about Obama thing it would be rude to bring up all I did and not explain it. If these links are still valid this is
clip from Charlie Rose
http://youtube.com/watch?v=xkrL0G9wonE
Test from Time of that fund raiser
http://thepage.time.com/transcript-of-obamas-remarks-at-san-francisco-fundraiser-sunday/
Posts from people there and sad by how it was taken
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-coleman/i-was-there-what-obama-re_b_96553.html
http://momocrats.typepad.com/momocrats/2008/04/obamas-remarks.html#more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC