Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I've a question regarding Ed Schultz

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 01:15 PM
Original message
I've a question regarding Ed Schultz
Edited on Thu May-26-11 01:41 PM by Lone_Star_Dem
I've seen all kinds of sensational headlines. I'll post a few examples below:

"MSNBC's Ed Schultz Off Air Indefinitely After Calling Radio Host Laura Ingraham a 'Slut'"

"MSNBC Suspends Ed Schultz for Calling Laura Ingraham a 'Right-Wing Slut'"

"Ed Schultz Suspended for Laura Ingraham Slur"


Which all seem to make it sound like he's "going down" for his language.


I've also read the statement by MSNBC:


MSNBC management met with Ed Schultz this afternoon and accepted his offer to take one week of unpaid leave for the remarks he made yesterday on his radio program. Ed will address these remarks on his show tonight, and immediately following begin his leave. Remarks of this nature are unacceptable and will not be tolerated.


This implies Ed chose his own punishment for the language he used. If he did so, along with the excellent apology he gave, why are some still upset over his suspension?

We're not Republicans. We don't condone misogynistic language and attitudes the way they do. It stands to reason we would expect an apology and punishment if someone who speaks to/for us were to use misogynistic language.

The language was offensive. He apologized and took a one week suspension w/o pay. I accept his apology and find the suspension term he offered to be an acceptable reprimand for his infraction. As far as I'm concerned it's a closed case.

So, what am I missing? Why are so many people still upset over his suspension?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because we are at "war," and of course the best and most mature way
to wage "war" is to call people names.

That's pretty much it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. lol
excellent way to state it :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. But the issue is the name called.
And "slut" has been used, not just historically but by RW pols very recently, to try to disempower women. Ed seems to realize this, and DID make an excellent apology for it.

And his apology and suspension is a wonderful contrast to the whining, insincere apologies of RW media blatherers and to the RW media's stonewalling, followed occasionally by suspension or firing caused by public outrage.

Let the rightwingers continue to complain -- in the context of Ed's apology and suspension, they will look like the douchebags they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. I have no idea. He made a mistake, he handled it like a grown up.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. That's how I'm seeing it.
I'm satisfied with the resolution and understand why it had to be handled the way it was. He did good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ed made a REAL apology,
It was genuine an nonevasive. None of that "I'm sorry if I offended anyone" crap mealy mouth cop out crap. Ed said he brought shame on himself, that he teaches his own kids to do better, that there is no excuse for what he did and that the only way he can ask anyone to judge how seriously he is sorry is by watching his behavior in the future - he pledged never to use that word in commentary again.

I respect Ed Schultz for that apology. It was an apology he needed to give and he gave it without a hint of equivication. If he thinks his behavior warrents a serious rebuke, and is so willing to own up to that, why should any of us take the seriousness of his mistake less seriously than he did.

Ed owned up, good on him. I look forward to his return.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Making mistakes like this one is an occupational hazard
when you talk for a living. He handled it very well unlike the slime on the other side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirkGently Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. Good question. Seems like it was handled correctly. Ed apologized & took leave. He wasn't beheaded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northoftheborder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. I watched his apology, and it really seemed totally sincere to me. And....
.....I have very sensitive antennae for fakery. I also found out it was on his radio show that he made this mistake. I've heard much worse on some radio - but I guess because he also works for NBC that he's more accountable than some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. One shouldn't have to apologize for telling the truth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. He apologized because he offended people in his base of followers
It's not about her being a vile talking pile of Republican regurgitation. No one is arguing that fact. Its that he made a mistake and offended people who support him, so he apologized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
kelly1mm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
29. Are you saying Laura Ingram is a slut? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'm not upset...
I think the whole thing is bullshit.

Aside from the eternally and professionally offended, who live in a state of perpetual high dudgeon, it's the sort of thing to talk about when you can't think of anything better to talk about.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. It's a bad day for free speach when you get unpaid suspension for using an adjective that jay leno
and the golden girls have used on air numerous times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. True.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnationalist Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. I so agree
'we' meaning some on the left are really too politically correct these days.

ED should have never appoligized..some in this country are way to sensitive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. Do Leno and The Golden Girls speak to/for the Left?
Were they offending core a part of their followers?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
17. NOT that it's okay, but . . . . as if no one ever does that??? ES is a target because some folks
fear his popular influence. He's a legitimate counter to Rush Limbaugh, so he is feared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
19. because he ain't coming back.
They're shoehorning Michael Steele into his timeslot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. God, no......
Edited on Thu May-26-11 02:41 PM by ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Once again, kowtowing to the far right has claimed another victim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
20. i agree. was unprofessinal. he apologized. she accepted (and that doesnt matter)
Edited on Thu May-26-11 02:38 PM by seabeyond
it is done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. I think she only accepted after positive press on his apology started coming out
At first she was scornful if I recall correctly. Then her snarky twitter post kept being attached to media coverage about his apology. It was making her look like the vile talking pile of Republican regurgitation she is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. as i said, i really dont care about the woman. not really about her. ed had class and i
appreciate him even more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
21. Because FAUX News broadcasts things far worse, stated as fact every night
And no one is even questioning it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Then question what they say. Protest it. Scream from a rooftop.
Do something about it if it offends you. Personally, I just don't watch them so I never know what they're saying. The point is they don't offend their base viewers when they use such language. Schlutz did and he said he was sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
27. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
thanks_imjustlurking Donating Member (462 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
28. It was misogynistic or at least irrelevant, and I object to it even in an ad-lib situation, but
that is one of the best apologies I've ever seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC