Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chernobyl Times Ten Fukushima and the Radioactive Sea

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 03:33 PM
Original message
Chernobyl Times Ten Fukushima and the Radioactive Sea
http://www.counterpunch.org/wasserman05262011.html

New readings show levels of radioisotopes found up to 30 kilometers offshore from the on-going crisis at Fukushima are ten times higher than those measured in the Baltic and Black Seas during Chernobyl.

"When it comes to the oceans, says Ken Buesseler, a chemical oceonographer at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, "the impact of Fukushima exceeds Chernobyl."

The news comes amidst a tsunami of devastating revelations about the Fukushima disaster and the crumbling future of atomic power, along with a critical Senate funding vote today:

Fukushima's owner, the Tokyo Electric Power Company, has confirmed that fuel at Unit One melted BEFORE the arrival of the March 11 tsunami.


More at the link --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tens of thousands of tons of radioactive water flushed into Pacific Ocean ...
and basically it's just another day in America as far as the reaction

of the American public going about their barequing yesterday and recovering today --

Why care about the Gulf either -- as Obama said "The Gulf will bounce back!" --



Yikes!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Electric Monk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why would unit one have melted down before the tsunami?
I thought the cause of the meltdowns was the backup generators (that ran the cooling system) getting damaged by the water :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The 9.1 earthquake that preceded tsunami. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Unrec for tabloid nonsense and deliberate misrepresentation.
"ten times higher than those measured in the Baltic and Black Seas during Chernobyl"

Which conveniently ignores the fact that the Baltic and Black Seas are hundreds of miles from Chernobyl. And that even at the time, the amount of contamination found there was negligible. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. rec to cancel the seagull-ing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. No facts to counter what I said.
Just more factually inaccurate nonsense and fearmongering. Nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-11 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-11 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Because "ten times Chernobyl" is designed to evoke a completely false image.
Without giving the reader the fine print that ten times nothing is still almost nothing. It's spin and propaganda. You could just as easily say that wind turbines get 10 times more complaints from locals than burning LNG, but if the actual rates are 2 complaints per thousand population and 20 per thousand population, it's so statistically insignificant that the claim itself amounts to bullshit, attempting to make a flashy headline to scare people.

But thanks for the personal insults. Nothing like attacking the messenger to show that you've got no facts on your side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. But it is safe...trust us
:sarcasm:

And it is under control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-11 04:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. You get more radiation microwaving a Healthy Choice dinner.
Edited on Wed Jun-01-11 04:19 AM by Bluebear
And if you don't believe that, you are a rabblerousing chicken little. Or so I hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC