Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Don't worry-- we only want to destroy Medicare for people under 55!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 03:44 PM
Original message
Don't worry-- we only want to destroy Medicare for people under 55!
I love how the people who want to destroy Medicare always stress that point, as if they just assume everyone is as self-centered as they are. They don't even consider that people might be concerned for the welfare of their children, grandchildren, neighbors, friends, etc. It really is bizarre to me every time I hear some talking head say it. It's like they just don't realize what such an argument says about them.

Worse than that, the same people who use words like "Mediscare" to describe accurate portrayals of their own legislation generally couple their argument with warnings that Medicare will go *poof* soon for everyone if they aren't allowed to use their bulldozers on it... essentially telling the elderly that if they'll just climb in the boat now and help pull up the ladder, they won't have to drown with their kids. But that's not a scare tactic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. That means me. 54.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Me too, won't turn 55 until late October. I suspect it will happen in some form or another though,
so not much any of us can do about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. You should be screaming to all your representatives about it.
I am, even though I just made the cut-off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. They want to save their future generations from a huge national debt
by making sure their grandkids are burdened with caring for their parents in their old age. Makes so much sense....

Anyone between 40-55 will be the ones really screwed as there is no where near enough time for them to make up the savings needed to care for themselves in old age.

Mean people in this equation are like my parents who fully support taking medicare away from me while utilizing it themselves. Stupid people are ones like my brother and sister who are eager to screw themselves. sigh.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HubertHeaver Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Their end game is to create a divide. Take something away from
one group while allowing the other to have that something will create resentment toward the group that maintains access to that something. It wouldn't be long before the call goes out to take it away from them to. "What did they ever do to deserve better treatment?" Ten to twenty years on they will be calling to de-fund whatever is left of Medicare and let the 75+ers fend for themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. That's a very likely scenario. If there are any doctors
still taking those less-profitable traditional Medicare patients.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-11 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. +100. and the ones who get the deal won't fight for the others, either.
they use the same strategy over and over.

it's called "two tier" and they used it on auto workers and other factory workers, they're using it on teachers, and they're using it on everybody that paid into ss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. I do so wish we could count on Obama to fight for those of us near 55
However, I expect him to concede before the start of negotiations, as is his custom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. You always expect the worst about Obama.
But he's always been a strong supporter of Medicare -- and the Democrats realize that this is an issue that's strongly breaking in their favor. They're not going to throw this opportunity away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I preferred the Obama that we voted for, not the one we got.
And however you try to frame it, Obama says Medicare is on the table... And things on the table tend to roll off in a unidirectional way. I feel WAY under supported by our current administration.

And I didn't always expect the worst, nor do I now, I expect precisely the same as he's shown us in since his election. The worst would be MUCH worse, but sadly, his BEST is way below the expectations I, and many others, had during his campaign.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. He doesn't say that VOUCHERS are on the table. He wants to bend down the cost curve,
which makes total sense. Why should private hospitals make profits of 25% and more? U.S. medical care costs are much higher than the rest of the world and we can't continue on this trajectory.

There are plenty of ways to reduce Medicare spending that won't hurt recipients at all. For example, current law prevents Medicare from negotiating better drug prices from the manufacturers, as Canada does. Also, when research says that certain procedures are unnecessary or even harmful, we should be taking that research into consideration. Why should an 80 year old have a screening colonoscopy, for example, when he has a greater risk of dying from the procedure than from an undiagnosed colon cancer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. I'd like the fight to include my and other's children and grandchildren....
not just those who are close to 55. We are all in this together. I hate being divided by age groups and I'm already on SS. United we stand, divided we fall and that means all of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. What we need to emphasize is that even the 55+ group isn't safe.
Edited on Tue May-31-11 04:18 PM by pnwmom
As the number of elderly people on traditional Medicare dwindles, more and more doctors and hospitals will simply refuse to care for those lower-profit people -- just as many of them now reject patients on Medicaid (which should be a crime, but isn't.)

Either that, or the price-breaks which the government is now able to negotiate through sheer numbers will disappear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. Splitting is what the capitalists do best -
political parties, religions, etc... they will use anything to keep the masses at each others throats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. Brilliant!
If your 54 you've only paid into the system for 35 to 39 years. Now, if you've been paying in for 36 to 40 years, then you just can't renege on the promise. :sarcasm:
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-11 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
15. I know! How stupid can they be!
I guess they don't want the under 55 vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC