|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:37 AM Original message |
Suggest to your state - Caylee's Law Proposal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erose999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
1. Thats a knee-jerk reaction if I ever saw one. I can't support it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:40 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:41 AM Response to Reply #1 |
11. Agreed...pointless legislation that would be difficult to enforce...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hifiguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:43 AM Response to Reply #1 |
13. +1 nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SusanaMontana41 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 03:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
128. Neither can I. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
2. What if your child were kidnapped and one of the demands was that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:47 AM Response to Reply #2 |
18. Good point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:54 AM Response to Reply #2 |
27. Color me a kook, but if my child was abducted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wait Wut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:47 AM Response to Reply #27 |
72. DING!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
3. No way. If we were out in the woods and my kid fell and died, I might not be able to notify... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:01 AM Response to Reply #3 |
30. Common sense is a lost art |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
4. It's already against the law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tuesday Afternoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:54 AM Response to Reply #4 |
26. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:56 AM Response to Reply #4 |
28. Reporting a disappearance? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:52 AM Response to Reply #28 |
75. It already is a crime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:56 AM Response to Reply #75 |
78. Per title and comments - state, not federal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:59 AM Response to Reply #78 |
80. and in most states, it already is a crime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 12:03 PM Response to Reply #80 |
84. Apparently not Florida. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 12:04 PM Response to Reply #84 |
89. It's called "child abuse" or "child neglect" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 12:09 PM Response to Reply #89 |
93. But the jury was given 'child abuse' as a lesser option. Not that it was proven either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 12:36 PM Response to Reply #93 |
98. No, they were only given "Aggravated Child Abuse" nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 02:04 PM Response to Reply #98 |
109. No, they weren't. Instructions also included § 827.03(1) Child Abuse as a lesser count |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 03:37 PM Response to Reply #109 |
129. so they were limited to intentional acts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 12:03 PM Response to Reply #28 |
86. Actually, there's already a federal law covering that. CAPTA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 12:19 PM Response to Reply #86 |
95. Thank you for the answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 01:04 PM Response to Reply #95 |
105. The current system, without timelines, is superior. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JonLP24 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 01:13 PM Response to Reply #105 |
107. I agree that way is superior |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 02:05 PM Response to Reply #105 |
110. Thank you - that makes sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marlakay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 02:29 PM Response to Reply #86 |
121. Can they still charge her on the lesser crimes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 02:52 PM Response to Reply #121 |
126. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:43 AM Response to Reply #4 |
67. +1...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 12:01 PM Response to Reply #67 |
81. Glad to see you weigh in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
6. please take this rage you feel and direct it at the Florida prosecutor who dropped the ball |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:48 AM Response to Reply #6 |
20. Sorry, but a child missing for 24 hours and not being reported will never be OK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:08 AM Response to Reply #20 |
38. then blame it on the orange county deputy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:10 AM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Dear friend, I am blaming no one. I am merely suggesting something forward |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:45 AM Response to Reply #20 |
69. First.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 12:04 PM Response to Reply #69 |
88. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BillStein (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
7. Many bad laws are made ad hoc nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trumad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
8. Here's my idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:46 AM Response to Reply #8 |
17. Che bella! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:14 AM Response to Reply #8 |
47. Well done... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:46 AM Response to Reply #8 |
70. Trumad... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trumad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 01:22 PM Response to Reply #70 |
108. It's a slippery slope when you knee jerk laws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:53 AM Response to Reply #8 |
76. Or go party & be photographed smiling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-09-11 07:19 PM Response to Reply #8 |
132. And partying! Don't forget partying! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brickbat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
9. No thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
10. OK. I have no problem with such a law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:45 AM Response to Reply #10 |
16. Why my title said "state" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
12. If the child dies in their sleep and you don't notice until you check on them when you wake up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:58 AM Response to Reply #12 |
29. Use some common sense here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:10 AM Response to Reply #29 |
41. the same ones we have now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:50 AM Response to Reply #29 |
74. Hundreds if not thousands of them... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:54 AM Response to Reply #29 |
77. Don't make me laugh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xphile (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
14. No good every comes from a law named after someone. It's always a knee jerk reaction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:50 AM Response to Reply #14 |
24. I disagree with that sentiment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:12 AM Response to Reply #24 |
43. Ah, but see, it isn't a law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:14 AM Response to Reply #43 |
48. Per below - Jessica’s Law, Megan's Law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:03 AM Response to Reply #14 |
33. Jessica’s Law, Megan's Law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:23 AM Response to Reply #33 |
58. Actually, yes, they are bad laws that should be repealed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:27 AM Response to Reply #58 |
61. You win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:32 AM Response to Reply #61 |
63. What won't you do 'for the children'? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wait Wut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 12:08 PM Response to Reply #61 |
92. I gave up, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 12:15 PM Response to Reply #92 |
94. I just feel sick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wait Wut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 12:37 PM Response to Reply #94 |
99. Yeah, you have to remember to breathe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 02:16 PM Response to Reply #99 |
116. Reaching for the paper bag now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 02:36 PM Response to Reply #116 |
123. I'm reaching for a bag, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-09-11 07:22 PM Response to Reply #123 |
133. You and me both. This is basically Nancy Grace writing laws. That won't end well. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NeedleCast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 02:24 PM Response to Reply #92 |
118. Oh FFS... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
15. Oy vey... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NeedleCast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
19. No. That's Just Dumb |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:50 AM Response to Reply #19 |
23. I'm a child of the 60s and used to be able to ride a bike without a helmet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NeedleCast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:27 AM Response to Reply #23 |
62. That 2011 isn't any different from the 60's except in the hysteria induced by the media |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wait Wut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 12:20 PM Response to Reply #62 |
96. BULLSHIT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 12:48 PM Response to Reply #96 |
101. You used to believe that child abuse was an inner city crime? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wait Wut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 12:52 PM Response to Reply #101 |
103. I'm 46 years old. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NeedleCast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 12:55 PM Response to Reply #96 |
104. Caps Lock Aggression Aside |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wait Wut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 01:08 PM Response to Reply #104 |
106. Lack of reading comprehension aside... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NeedleCast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 02:21 PM Response to Reply #106 |
117. Not a hot topic on DU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
21. In other words, remove all human judgment from the equation, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 12:02 PM Response to Reply #21 |
83. Damn your logic! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wait Wut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 12:45 PM Response to Reply #21 |
100. Blame the parents, then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackintheGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
22. Hello, police? My child is missing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:06 AM Response to Reply #22 |
35. That was my first thought as well. Require them to file a report the police refuses to accept? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JonLP24 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
25. Often times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:05 AM Response to Reply #25 |
34. As stated - agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:07 AM Response to Reply #25 |
37. USA-PATRIOT law comes to mind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
31. Casey's MOTHER reported Caylee missing after Casey told her she was missing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:08 AM Response to Reply #31 |
39. I hope you are snarling at Time and not me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:11 AM Response to Reply #39 |
42. Yes, I was referring to the news story. Friends? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:14 AM Response to Reply #42 |
46. Cheers! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:21 AM Response to Reply #46 |
55. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsrobert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
32. knee-JERK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
36. If they don't name it Caylee's Law, I'm all for it. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:12 AM Response to Reply #36 |
44. I don't give a flying fuck what they call it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XOKCowboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:24 AM Response to Reply #36 |
59. They ought to call it Nancy Grace's Law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 12:50 PM Response to Reply #59 |
102. They should call it Nancy Grace's Face... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoneOffShore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
45. No - Reactive law is bad law. Witness the Patriot Act and others of that ilk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:17 AM Response to Reply #45 |
50. So we should repeal the laws that were in reaction to Jessica Lundsford and Megan Kanka? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoneOffShore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 12:27 PM Response to Reply #50 |
97. I'm not "offended". I stand by my statement that reactive law is generally bad law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 02:09 PM Response to Reply #97 |
112. I apologize |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoneOffShore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 04:36 PM Response to Reply #112 |
130. Stuff happens. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guitar man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
49. Oh boy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wait Wut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
51. I approve, 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:22 AM Response to Reply #51 |
57. Thank you for your comments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wait Wut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:42 AM Response to Reply #57 |
66. I feel that way every day, here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
52. This seems like it could become a government intrusion into family business |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
53. Already happening in OK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krabigirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
54. Lol, yeah, like nothing could go wrong with that kind of law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tuckessee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
56. More knee-jerk garbage from law crazed fascists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:26 AM Response to Reply #56 |
60. If he shows up 2 days later, no one would know. If he is found dead 2 days later, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:58 AM Response to Reply #60 |
79. That's absurd. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xphile (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 12:03 PM Response to Reply #60 |
85. That kind of non-thinking logic is exactly why I will NOT be notifying my state representative. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
64. Absolutely NOT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:40 AM Response to Reply #64 |
65. I have apparently lived a sheltered life where as a child, I have never been placed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lyric (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 12:04 PM Response to Reply #65 |
87. Apparently you have indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 02:13 PM Response to Reply #87 |
114. Like I said, it was the concept that I support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bragi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
68. Thank gawd for checks and balances... /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
71. Another stupid law will not help. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
73. Bad facts make bad law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
82. I'd rather support a law that made it criminal for a grandstanding prosecutor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 12:06 PM Response to Reply #82 |
90. Well, that would put a complete end to most, if not all, criminal prosecutions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dembotoz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 12:06 PM Response to Reply #82 |
91. but the prisons are too full already |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ljm2002 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
111. Extreme cases make bad laws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 02:15 PM Response to Reply #111 |
115. Lemme guess, you are another one here that wants to repeal Jessica's Law and Megan's Law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kick-ass-bob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 02:44 PM Response to Reply #115 |
124. Anything done in quick fashion in a reactive state is bad law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sequoia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
113. Uh boy, here come the Nancy Grace watchers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
119. Um, no. I won't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hassin Bin Sober (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
120. I think proponents of knee-jerk legislation should keep themselves busy using masturbation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 02:33 PM Response to Reply #120 |
122. Your welcome. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ScreamingMeemie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
125. No way, no how...forget about it. It's already neglect. Pity the state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saras (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-07-11 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
127. No. Wrong. Harmful reactionary advice. I will write my legislators AGAINST such thoughtless panic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawson Leery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-09-11 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
131. I oppose laws made from knee-jerk reactions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-09-11 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
134. There aren't any child neglect laws where you live? Who told you that? Nancy Grace? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lightningandsnow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-09-11 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
135. There are far too many ways that this could go wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
former9thward (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-09-11 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
136. The most ridiculous law I have ever heard proposed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cereal Kyller (400 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-09-11 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
137. Now I know what you meant! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
naaman fletcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-11-11 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
138. At least you admit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 14th 2024, 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC