Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CEO: Monthly ‘problems’ why women earn less

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-11 10:05 PM
Original message
CEO: Monthly ‘problems’ why women earn less
Source: MSNBC

The head of a business group has been fired after asserting that menstruation makes women less productive in the workplace than men.

Alasdair Thompson, chief executive of New Zealand's Employers and Manufacturers Association, made the comments during a radio debate.

The BBC reported that Thompson sparked controversy by suggesting that women earned less than men because "once a month they have sick problems." He added that when women become mothers "they have to take time off to go home" to look after their children.

Thompson told radio station NewstalkZB that he was not sexist and insisted that his comments were the "facts of life."

Read more: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43655299/ns/business-personal_finance/



:banghead: WTF year is this? 1911?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-11 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. If menstruation makes women less productive
then insanity must really decrease worker productivity meaning no CEO should make over 200 bucks a year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-11 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. In CEO speak, 200 bucks is $200 Million, so they would be ok with your statement! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TorchTheWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. And I can make a similar comment that his brain is in his "little head"
Which is why men are just so incompetent and therefore deserving of less pay. But no, that wouldn't be sexist at all.

/sarcasm

What a neanderthal pig.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. +1 --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. Where do they find these clowns?
Why do they get to be CEOs?
What a fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cereal Kyller Donating Member (400 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
28. Cretinous Egotistical Oafs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Acronyms can be fun. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. Is it true?
Do women on average take more sick time than men?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. my goodness but is there any Republican talking point that you won't give credence to?
immigration, public education, anti-civil rights, etc.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Is that you sherlock?
Because no one else could spin such a lengthy yarn from such a tiny clue.

I simply asked a question: is it true.

Seems straightforward to me. If it isn't then he can be empirically shown to be false. Simple enough?

And your stance on *illegal* immigration is clearly in support of the wealthy earning more money off cheap brown labor. How progressive.

Not sure what you're talking about on the other two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. It seems rather unlikely to me. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Truth to power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Probably. Most of the care giving for children and family falls on women.
I doubt that women take off more sick leave for themselves, but I would bet that on average, women take more leave than men to take care of children and family members who are sick. Family leave is counted as "sick" leave even when it's on behalf of somebody else's sickness.

In other words, not only are women less likely to be slackers, they are taking on more than half the burden of caring for other people. Making the asshole CEO's comment even more stupid and uninformed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. It seems he was right:
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/story?id=4241746&page=1

"I doubt that women take off more sick leave for themselves, but I would bet that on average, women take more leave than men to take care of children and family members who are sick. Family leave is counted as "sick" leave even when it's on behalf of somebody else's sickness."

All that's speculation though.

That they take off more days seems to be a fact. Why they do it is up for debate. Either way from an employers viewpoint it doesn't really matter: whether you're taking off sick leave as a "personal day" or to take care of your sick child the end result is the same.

"In other words, not only are women less likely to be slackers, they are taking on more than half the burden of caring for other people. Making the asshole CEO's comment even more stupid and uninformed."

But that's based on "facts" that are speculation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. There are many studies indicating that women take on more of a caregiver role. Those are facts.
It's not speculation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Ok, so prove that the increase in sick
days taken by women are accounted for by taking care of children or sick relatives.

Then prove that it makes a difference to employers the exact reason why their workers are not working.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Please read post #14, the actual statistical difference is 1.6 days per year. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. That amounts to a difference in leave of about 25%
Not inconsequential.

Additionally I'd like to see their raw data on that one as you can compare many radically different kinds of jobs to get whatever results you wish.

Also I find those numbers suspect because they don't jive with what other nations have found.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. That's it, cling to it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. I will "cling" to the statistics, thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. So here's more "statistics". The average cycle is 3 - 7 days long.
That means menstruating women are having "that time of the month" for 36 - 84 days per year.

Yet they are only missing 1.6 more days/year than men?

So how can you possibly leap to the conclusion that it's menstruation that's "causing" women to miss more days? If it's truly "that time of the month" that means women should be missing far more than 1.6 days/year due to having their period.

It's far, far more likely they miss more days because of the statistically proven fact that they are the primary caretakers because MEN aren't stepping up and doing their fair share.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Again, that number cited is at odds with what other nations have found
either every other nation is wrong or this one study was inaccurate. Or maybe NZ women are radically different than women everywhere else.

"It's far, far more likely they miss more days because of the statistically proven fact that they are the primary caretakers because MEN aren't stepping up and doing their fair share."

Bit of misandry there. Yes yes, it's all mens fault. Men are evil and should be killed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. Nice strawman but I'll kick the thread for more exposure just for you. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #30
39. Your numbers are wrong.
You're thinking of calendar months -- 12 to the year.

menstrual cycles are usually near 28 days. 28 Days is a lunar month and there are 13 lunar months per year. 13 x 28 = 364.


The standard "nine months" as pregnancy length is wrong. It's actually ten lunar months, 280 days.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Also you'll note that when I claimed something
I posted evidence of it.

You simply stated your conclusion then called it a fact with no citation.

Did you ever write an essay in college or at least highschool? How many "facts" did you teachers let you claim without sources?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
23. Do you think women check some box when they menstruate so the boss knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
25. And what if they did?
Is everything to be judged and accounted for based on its bottom-line effect on corporate books?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapislzi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
33. Oh, yeah, I take 4 - 5 days off every month
I'm completely bedridden.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
38. Supposedly child care does have a lot to do with the disparity in pay
So, how do we convince the culture that men have an equal responsibility for child care?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. There are about a thousand things wrong with what he said.
Edited on Thu Jul-07-11 06:40 PM by BlueIris
Not the least of which is his implication that women are, by nature, incapable of contributing to the workplace and society in the "same" way that men do.

I am ashamed for anyone who validates the idea that it is acceptable to pay women less than men, or that it is acceptable to pay anyone who "takes more sick time" less than a person who doesn't take as much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
14. 'Sick leave' boss: I've learnt my lesson
Embattled business leader Alasdair Thompson has apologised again for saying women get paid less than men because they take sick days "once a month".

Thompson, chief executive of the Employment and Manufacturers Association, released an "unreserved, unqualified apology" to media today saying his comments on a radio show yesterday were misplaced and irrelevant.

"I apologise for my poor choice of words and bad judgment during the discussion about gender and productivity in the workplace," Thompson said.

---

The Public Service Association today released statistics showing that while women take more sick leave than men, the difference was just 1.6 days a year.

http://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/sick-leave-boss-i-ve-learnt-my-lesson-4260852
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #14
34. awesome. Power of the internet to spread jackass comments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressIn2008 Donating Member (848 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. Hmmm... I'm thinking 1962, actually. Sounds about right. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
24. I haven't heard that argument in decades
We wimmens shouldn't bother our purty little heads about important stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
6000eliot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
27. This kind of thinking is why they are worth so much more than we are.
This is why their salaries are so much larger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
31. Womens' monthly problem is sexism. nt
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 11:17 PM by ZombieHorde
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
35. Well I read the article twice and
didn't see where the guy was saying that menstruation is the cause of women taking sick days from work. He attributed that to childcare.

What I did see him say was that menstruation makes women less effective at work.

and no doubt he's saying that because we wimmens aren't as "productive" at work because we have to make time in the ladies room for taking care of sanitary needs.

Yes, it's true...it takes probably a whole 90 seconds to change a pad or tampon. Multiply that by three or four times during an eight hour day...

That's SIX WHOLE MINUTES of non-productivity!!!!

aughhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


oy. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morning Dew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. Since we have to work twice as hard to be seen as half as good as men
that six minutes is critical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
40. What an asshole !!!
nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
41. I was totally disabled by menstruation.
From the age of 12 to the age of 53, every period was painful.
I was barely able to drag myself out of bad for two to four days. Multiply that by 13 lunar months. That's a minimum of 26 up to 52 days out of the year and no job gives you that much time off.

And why should I have to go to the doctor once a month to get a note for sick leave when menstruation is a normal physical function? Can anybody answer me that one?

the pain can be fixed with motrin, but also there is extreme physical exhaustion.

When I was getting a divorce my ex-husband's lawyer took my deposition for TWO HOURS asking me about my menstrual periods, and I brought my daily datebook, and told him about the thirteen month thing. He couldn't understand why I didn't have a job, and he implied I wasn't looking. I told him I did not know of any jobs that gave fifty-two days a year time off for illness. That was the MOST HUMILIATING two hours of my life.

I wish I could have gotten it recognized as a periodic recurring temporary disability. The real problem is that men and women are different, and some women, like me, had severe cramps. Our society expects us all to work long hours with no food, no bathroom breaks, and no sleep. We are supposed to be little robots with no physical needs. I know a judge who literally worked his court reporter to death. She died of respiratory failure at age 40, and I'm convinced it was overwork. She worked so hard her immune system crashed.


I wish we had menstrual leave. Some companies in Asia have it. But if a woman admits she has cramps and has to stay home in bed, she is weak. Well, sorry, until medical science fixes it, I was weak.

When I was 24 weeks along with my pregnancy I could not work. I got so big that when I sat up, the pressure on my ribs was very painful. So I stayed home and laid down a lot, and ate and slept and tried to breathe. I missed four months before delivery and two months afterwards.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spinbaby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
42. He's testosterone impaired
Can't have a CEO operating under the influence of a such a destabilizing hormone.Obviously it's making him unproductive and unworthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC