Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If no debt deal means no Social Security checks, does it also mean no more war?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 12:47 PM
Original message
If no debt deal means no Social Security checks, does it also mean no more war?
Edited on Tue Jul-12-11 12:48 PM by Karmadillo
If we can't pay Social Security checks out of the Social Security trust fund, which is currently running a surplus, where would we get the money to pay for the Forever War?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. how about no congressional pay AND no war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Yep. They can play freakin' chicken with their own pay AND medical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dana_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. I was thinking the same thing
evidently not - or at least he didn't mention it (unless my ears were still buzzing from the concert I went to last night). There is always $$ for death and destruction - not so much for food and shelter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. oh no no -- *some* people in this society will *always* be paid...
...warmongers chief among the front-of-liners...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. It seems we have almost reached the serfdom phase. That's OUR money they're playing chicken with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. It is sacred. It should not even be in the conversation. ever. at all. way the hell too
far to the right...The entire national conversation is always where the republicans want it to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. I would hope so.
Was war money mentioned, I did not see the report?

Threatening no SS payments won't move the Republicans one inch, in fact they'd probably be happy about it.

If Obama wants to play real chess, then he should not just be attacking their pawns, he needs to take one of their most valuable pieces. And money for War not being available to them would definitely move them.

Seems like it's always Social Security on the chopping block, but never War funds.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. The 27th amendment will not allow this to mess up congressional pay...
The Defense Authorization Bill was signed on January 07,2011, that provided funding through the end of the year. I'm not sure how this will affect military operations.

The question I have is this, where does the funding for the Social Security Administration come from. If their operation is funded form the General Fund, then this is a real threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Indirectly, it is funded by the general fund.
Funds are paid to SS, and SS buys Treasury Bonds with the money, and of course also gets interest on their money. When money has to be paid out to its members, the Treasuries are sold and cash is transfered from the general fund to support the checks that are written.

Foolish as this sounds, it's like if you have a billion dollars, and invests it all in one stock...say B of A. You are still worth the billion $$. You buy things, and write checks to pay for them and you sell some of your stock to fund the checks. Then one day, B of A declares bankruptcy. Your invesstment is GONE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Then this is a legitimate threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. No! No! We must "support the troops"! The old and ill can just suck it up and "sacrifice".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. Haha, a good one! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toddwv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. There is always money for war.
Always.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. I wondered the same about the "balanced budget amendment"
If we can't pay for war in the same year as we wage it, will it stop?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. War Money? "Everyone CTFO. He's got that." with the help of Congress
"The House of Representatives recently voted for a $649 billion defense spending bill that increases the Defense Department’s budget by $17 billion."

(snip)

The military budget is not on the table,” Frank told MSNBC.com. “The military is at the table, and it is eating everybody else’s lunch.”


House Votes on Increasing Defense Budget
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=1470304&mesg_id=1470474

Passed overwhelmingly. 336-87.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. not at all--except that soldier's families won't get a check. But who cares?
Halliburton is still safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. May I steal that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Ha. Feel free.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
18. oh no, there's ALWAYS money for war and killing...ALWAYS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
simonmagnus Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
19. Was that a serious question?
I have grown so accustomed to the backwards thinking of our current government and was surprised by your sensible question. In a responsible and grown-up world funding for wars would be the last option and advancement of human civilization would be the highest priority.

We live in a fucked up society where cash is king to the detriment of the environment. War and its plunder are profitable so don't expect it to go away anytime soon. Also keep in mind that it is usually the economically disadvantaged and uninformed that join the military. If we actually took care of people's most basic needs with a resource-based economy, war would go extinct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
20. No. Aren't the wars a separate line item? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
23. that would be great. oh, and no TSA either, and buy-bye fatherland security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Very funny. They will pass out IOU's to the troops but the wars will continue.
There is no level of busted that would result in the wars ending short of complete collapse or the slow disintegration of ability over some years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
25. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC